Stephen Lewis, a successful writer of children's books, is confronted with the unthinkable: his only child, three-year-old Kate, is snatched from him in a supermarket. In one horrifying moment that replays itself over the years that follow, Stephen realizes his daughter is gone. With extraordinary tenderness and insight, Booker Prize–winning author Ian McEwan takes us into the dark territory of a marriage devastated by the loss of a child. Kate's absence sets Stephen and his wife, Julie, on diverging paths as they each struggle with a grief that only seems to intensify with the passage of time. Eloquent and passionate, the novel concludes in a triumphant scene of love and hope that gives full rein to the author's remarkable gifts. The winner of the Whitbread Prize, The Child in Time is an astonishing novel by one of the finest writers of his generation.
Publication Year: 1987
No posts yet
Kick off the convo with a theory, question, musing, or update
Your rating:
This book put me on a reading slump. Ive been stuck for 2 weeks without reading bc just looking at it made me feel bad.
I did not see the point of this book, other than talking about solitude and trauma, but there was other stuff going on at the same time and none of those made sense.
I felt like I was in point A and suddenly in point F and didnt know how I got there.
There's even a moment of time traveling in this story and dud wtf.
I get all the sadness and the plot revolvin about childhood and child care but I think this could have been better developed so it doesn't feel like that book you were forced to read.
I know a lot of people loved this, it has a nice writing but the story, at its core, wasn't for me.