Your rating:
Achilles loved playing the hero… Being a mere man had never been enough for him. He wanted to be a great one. And when he finds out that Helen, his childhood best friend, has gone missing, taking the mission is instinct. Even if it meant returning to the place he was born and raised, a place he swore never to return to —Heraklion. But he goes nowhere without Patroclus. Patroclus loved being one… But being a hero was nothing like playing one. It was a senseless sequence of pyrrhic victories he’d carry forever. Yet when Achilles needs him to return to Heraklion and the arena he had been forced to claw his way out of, he says yes because… well, of course he does. He would follow Achilles anywhere. Yet both had left more of themselves in Heraklion’s notorious arena than they’d taken. So returning would not require heroes but something else, something worse, especially when Helen is not the only one in need of rescue. They both must determine not only what it means to be a man, but what it means to be a good one.
No posts yet
Kick off the convo with a theory, question, musing, or update
Your rating:
I honestly really liked this book. I enjoyed the characters, the plot, and the relationship between Achilles and Patroclus. I especially appreciated Hermes' role in the story as in myth he is the only god that can come and go to the Underworld as he pleases so I loved seeing him play a similar role in this story. There were a couple of things that bothered me enough that I couldn't rate this book higher but I am eagerly awaiting the next installment in the series.