The Museum of Innocence

The Museum of Innocence

Orhan Pamuk

Enjoyment: Quality: Characters: Plot:

“It was the happiest moment of my life, though I didn’t know it.” So begins the new novel, his first since winning the Nobel Prize, from the universally acclaimed author of Snow and My Name Is Red. It is 1975, a perfect spring in Istanbul. Kemal, scion of one of the city’s wealthiest families, is about to become engaged to Sibel, daughter of another prominent family, when he encounters Füsun, a beautiful shopgirl and a distant relation. Once the long-lost cousins violate the code of virginity, a rift begins to open between Kemal and the world of the Westernized Istanbul bourgeosie—a world, as he lovingly describes it, with opulent parties and clubs, society gossip, restaurant rituals, picnics, and mansions on the Bosphorus, infused with the melancholy of decay—until finally he breaks off his engagement to Sibel. But his resolve comes too late. For eight years Kemal will find excuses to visit another Istanbul, that of the impoverished backstreets where Füsun, her heart now hardened, lives with her parents, and where Kemal discovers the consolations of middle-class life at a dinner table in front of the television. His obsessive love will also take him to the demimonde of Istanbul film circles (where he promises to make Füsun a star), a scene of seedy bars, run-down cheap hotels, and small men with big dreams doomed to bitter failure. In his feckless pursuit, Kemal becomes a compulsive collector of objects that chronicle his lovelorn progress and his afflicted heart’s reactions: anger and impatience, remorse and humiliation, deluded hopes of recovery, and daydreams that transform Istanbul into a cityscape of signs and specters of his beloved, from whom now he can extract only meaningful glances and stolen kisses in cars, movie houses, and shadowy corners of parks. A last change to realize his dream will come to an awful end before Kemal discovers that all he finally can possess, certainly and eternally, is the museum he has created of his collection, this map of a society’s manners and mores, and of one man’s broken heart. A stirring exploration of the nature of romantic attachment and of the mysterious allure of collecting, The Museum of Innocence also plumbs the depths of an Istanbul half Western and half traditional—its emergent modernity, its vast cultural history. This is Orhan Pamuk’s greatest achievement.


From the Forum

No posts yet

Kick off the convo with a theory, question, musing, or update

Recent Reviews

Your rating:

  • Apr 06, 2025
    Enjoyment: Quality: Characters: Plot:

    I’m honestly not entirely sure why I finished this book. It was dragging for hundreds of pages, and it was absolutely not what I was looking for in the middle of a war. Also, though I like to read and keep the books from my travels, this purchase from an emergency landing that brought me to the airport in Istanbul hardly counts as a travel book. In any case, I powered through the over 700 pages of rambling and navel-gazing that, while written quite beautifully, comprised a plot that was utterly predictable. 

    The first 200 pages or so were engaging and exciting as Kemal and Füsun developed their attraction to each other and as the structure of the novel began to take form. The idea of a museum within a book is creative and struck me by surprise multiple times throughout the set up. Even Kemal’s helpless wandering as he sought out Füsun was intriguing, with great atmosphere and interesting characterization. But the eight years of meals at the Keskin’s as Kemal pined over Füsun and indulged his kleptomania were exhausting and repetitive, made the more frustrating by the narrator’s insistence that the reader/visitor is bound to be struck and moved by these recollections of quotidian beauty. Perhaps it reinforced the character’s delusions. but mostly I just found it irritating. 

    Pamuk clearly has tremendous skill as a writer. This novel is filled with well-crafted sentences (credit to the translator as well) and unique structural choices (including the author’s writing himself into the story as the character writing the story. I respect his skill and would consider picking up another of his books, but it would have to be significantly shorter, and I would need the assurance that it didn’t become gratuitous as the chapters went on. 

    0
    comments 0
    Reply
  • View all reviews
    Community recs if you liked this book...