Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? 1 (Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, #1)

Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? 1 (Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, #1)

Philip K. Dick

Enjoyment: Quality: Characters: Plot:

San Francisco lies under a cloud of radioactive dust. The World War has killed millions, driving entire species to extinction and sending mankind off-planet. Those who remained coveted any living creature, and for people who couldn’t afford one, companies built incredibly realistic fakes: horses, birds, cats, sheep . . . even humans. Rick Deckard is an officially sanctioned bounty hunter tasked to find six rogue androids—they’re machines, but look, sound, and think like humans—clever, and most of all, dangerous humans. [Philip K. Dick’s award-winning Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? served as the basis for the film BLADE RUNNER. BOOM! Studios presents the complete novel transplanted into the comic book medium, mixing all-new panel-to-panel continuity with the actual text from the novel in an innovative, ground-breaking 24-issue maxi-series.]


From the Forum

No posts yet

Kick off the convo with a theory, question, musing, or update

Recent Reviews

Your rating:

  • Enjoyment: Quality: Characters: Plot:

    In the near future, World War Terminus has come and gone, leaving nuclear devastation in its wake. Many animal species have gone extinct either from the direct impact of the bombs or the lingering radioactive dust. Unsurprisingly, much of Earth's population has chosen to move to colonies and abandon the Earth to the unfortunates who are unable to leave. In order to entice people to the colonies, the government offers a free android servant to anyone willing to emigrate. As you might expect, not every robot functions perfectly and bounty hunters are employed by every major city on Earth to hunt down androids who have killed their owners and escaped to Earth. One such bounty hunter is Rick Deckard. Suddenly promoted to top bounty hunter after the guy above him is incapacitated, Rick is tasked with "retiring" six highly dangerous androids hiding out in San Francisco. Rick must track down these androids (who are impossible to identify physically and must be discovered via a test for empathy) before they disappear into the abandoned buildings of the city and possibly take more human lives.

    The original story is a bit of an odd duck for me. I really struggled wanting to continue during the first two chapters. Dick's writing is a challenge. It's dense and incredibly sneaky with a dark, sly humor that can feel odd and difficult to work through but the longer I stuck with it, the more I loved it. By the time I hit the third chapter, I couldn't put it down. I say all this to mark that I get why someone might be turned off from reading the novel. It's not heroic, Star Wars style science fiction. Its characters are flawed and oftentimes petty individuals. Deckard gets in ridiculous fights with his wife, his neighbors and even his boss. He's obsessed with getting a living animal instead of the fake, electric ones that have been all he could afford on a policeman's salary. Half the time, he's not even sure he wants to continue retiring "andys." But those same flaws are what makes Deckard such a fantastic character. Through Deckard, Dick makes readers question what makes someone human, whether empathy is a uniquely human condition and whether that makes us better than something made entirely of circuits and wires. Dick is not a science fiction writer, he's a philosopher. And  yet, he maintains the action in a way that compels you to keep reading so you can find out what happens next. I still feel like I need to read the book three more times at least to get all of its facets. Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? is a classic because it forces readers to question everything.

    In regards to this adaptation....unpopular opinion time! I haaaaaated this. I'm only giving it two stars because I can't give any version of this story less than that. The whole point of having a graphic novel adaptation is that you can make a story more accessible for readers who might get bogged down in the author's writing style or prefer a visual illustration of the story. The Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? omnibus is the exact opposite of that. Every single word of Dick's text is replicated in the panels, creating walls of text that obscure the creative illustrations by Parker. The result spoon feeds the text of the novel to the audience, sparing them only the effort of having to visualize the characters and scenes. The strength of having a graphic novel is to allow the art to tell pieces of the story for you and only use text to show what the pictures cannot. There are bizarre inconsistencies like identical model androids looking completely different and strange sequences that appear to show the escaped androids in two completely different physical appearances. If someone had never read the novel, it's possible that they might enjoy getting to see the story in a visual format. But the walls of text make that more difficult. This is not an adaptation of the novel, it's a straight illustration of it. It's absolutely one of my biggest pet peeves in the graphic novel medium and I don't understand the inability to identify that the strength of the medium lies in not having to tell everything. Reading this was an infuriating experience. The only part I truly enjoyed was the section of essays at the end by current comics authors and artists about how Phillip K. Dick and the original novel influenced them and their writing/art.

    Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? is a story which forces readers to question the line between human and android, what becomes important to us and how we connect to each other and even understand ourselves. It's a brilliant tale that has influenced much of popular culture since it was first published. This adaptation should have made that story accessible to readers who might be turned off by Dick's writing style or just wanted to see the story re-told in a more visual way. Instead, it's a bland copy with artwork that can't be seen enough to be appreciated. I highly recommend the source material but I can only recommend this adaptation to those who want an illustrated version of the text.

    0
    comments 0
    Reply
  • View all reviews
    Community recs if you liked this book...