avatar

femaleprivilege

35f / reader, writer and cookie connoisseur. 🍪 sometimes i write about stuff here: femaleprivilege.substack.com

3233 points

0% overlap
Level 6
Supporting* Women's Wrongs
Made for the Movies
My Taste
Frankenstein
My Year of Rest and Relaxation
Animal Farm
A Certain Hunger
Sex at Dawn: The Prehistoric Origins of Modern Sexuality
Reading...
Made for Love
25%
Paradais
26%
Medium Raw: A Bloody Valentine to the World of Food and the People Who Cook
45%

October 2026

The CompoundThe Song of Achilles

3.68 average  ·  176 reviews

Click a segment to filter

  • Jun 01, 2026
    Of Cattle and Men
    Of Cattle and MenAna Paula Maia
    5.0
    Enjoyment: 4.5Quality: 5.0Characters: 4.0Plot: 4.0
    🐮
    🔪
    🫠

    This book made me feel bad (complimentary)

    The theme of moral ambiguity really stuck out to me the most while reading this book. Right away, we can tell that Edgar has a strong moral code. (Granted, it’s an odd one…) He works a pretty gnarly job, one that many of us would never dream of having. It is a taxing job filled with death, blood, and suffering. It is “impure but morally acceptable,” according to him.

    ‘Somebody’s got to do the dirty work. Other people’s dirty work. Nobody wants to do that sort of thing. That’s why God put guys like you and me on this earth.’

    He has made peace with this because he treats the cows with kindness. He soothes them as they enter his cube, and he blesses them with the sign of the cross moments before he gives them a mallet to the skull. He believes the animals do not suffer.

    "He's not proud of what he does, but if someone has to do it, then let it be him, who has pity on those irrational beasts.”

    While death, and perhaps even suffering, are natural, Edgar is in a business that extracts maximum profits from that death and suffering. They pay their employees very little, despite the back-breaking work, and the men can’t even afford to eat the product they help produce! In a way, the men are not that different from the cows they are killing. Edgar often describes seeing himself in the cows — literally, he sees his own reflection in their black eyes the moment before their death. They are both being exploited for profit.

    "Two enclosures, one for cattle, and one for men, standing side-by-side."

    It really makes you consider how we all have our individual moral compasses, our own understandings of right and wrong. For example, Edgar murders a co-worker for not stunning the cows properly and causing them to suffer. On the one hand, he kills somebody and throws their body in a river. But on the other… the guy was a total dick. We may view Edgar’s moral code as confusing, but that is because human morality is often messy and contradictory — especially under capitalism.

    “They adhere to a code of conduct, and they all stand facing the same direction while grazing. This sort of harmony is unheard of in men.”

    Like many of us, Edgar is trapped between adhering to his values and surviving the economic system we’re forced to live in. We can all moralize capitalism as much as we want, but the reality is, these men need jobs now. One of them pays for his daughter's eyeglasses by taking bets on how long he can hold his breath. There are starving families outside of the slaughterhouse begging for the cows that would otherwise go to waste, despite the risks of disease.

    There is a moment where a young woman asks Edgar if he considers himself a murderer, to which he says yes. But when asked whether he is ashamed of it, he asks if she has ever eaten a hamburger and "how do you think it got there?" We have to consider that just because we keep distance between us and the bloody process, that doesn't make us any less complicit. Not to go Marxist on y'all's asses but this connects to his concept of alienation — The workers are alienated from their labor (they can't afford what they produce). The consumer is alienated from the production (they don't see the nasty bits). The product is alienated from its origin (a hamburger does not resemble the cow).

    Edgar does end up eating his first hamburger eventually. "Round and seasoned like that, they don’t even look like they had ever been a cow. Not one glimpse of the unbridled horror behind something so tender and delicious.”

    0


  • Thoughts from 96% (page 644)

    I struggle with how to articulate this (and yet, she persisted!), but a big criticism people seem to have with this book is regarding the rape. Don't get me wrong, I don't love reading about that, but I think it's a bit more complicated than some give it credit for. On one hand, I don't believe in sanitizing subjects to make people more comfortable, and it feels dishonest to pretend this wasn't one of the grim realities of the kind of war this book is depicting. That being said, I understand the more nuanced conversation is not "whether it should exist in the book" but rather "was it executed well."

    I think it all comes down to what does this act actually accomplish for the story overall? For example, several chapters ago, when the Dothraki assault a young girl after raiding her village, we watch it all happen through Dany's eyes. She sees herself in this girl and decides to intervene, something she likely hoped someone would have done for her when she was essentially being sold into sex slavery.

    Dany may have found peace in the Dothraki (although I could argue that she had no other choice) but her safety had been conditional on Drogo being unbeatable, so the parallels between her and this young girl continue. Once Drogo is all but dead, essentially both of these women lose their protector. Both Dany and this girl are still slaves, and it eventually all came back around anyway once Dany's authority (aka Drogo's protection) was gone. Not to get too graphic here, but in this chapter we learn that the young girl was later assaulted by several Dothraki men and had her throat slit afterwards…

    As the maegi says: "Saved me? Three riders had taken me, not as a man takes a woman, but from behind, as a dog takes a bitch. The fourth was in me when you rode past. How then did you save me? I saw my god‘s house burn, where I had healed good men beyond counting. My home they burned as well, and in the street I saw piles of heads. […] Tell me again what you saved."

    I guess the question is, what is GRRM trying to say with this? Perhaps that individual morality cannot dismantle a system? It's incredibly bleak, yet, thematically consistent with the book — your individual honor and virtue don’t really mean shit when the structure is still alive and well.

    Since I'm already on the topic, it has me thinking about some other unsavory scenes in the book. One example that doesn't pass my test is the Tysha story. This scene does provide something — it shows us Tywin's cruelty, the lengths he'll go to humiliate Tyrion, Tyrion’s trauma. But honestly, it would have been enough of a gut-punch to have your father orchestrate the greatest heartbreak of your life without adding gang rape to it… My point is that I'm not making a blanket defense of GRRM's use of rape in this series, but rather saying that there are nuances to it!

    26
    10