femaleprivilege commented on a post
Is this book annoying? Yes. Am I still enjoying it? Yes... and what about it???
femaleprivilege started reading...

On Earth As It Is Beneath
Ana Paula Maia
femaleprivilege is interested in reading...

Slaughterhouse-Five
Kurt Vonnegut Jr.
femaleprivilege started reading...

Honey
Isabel Banta
femaleprivilege wrote a review...
This book made me feel bad (complimentary)
Itās crazy how much can happen in just 100 pages! This may end up being a five-star read after I mull it over some more.
The theme of moral ambiguity really stuck out to me the most while reading this book. Right away, we can tell that Edgar has a strong moral code. (Granted, itās an odd oneā¦) He works a pretty gnarly job, one that many of us would never dream of having. It is a taxing job filled with death, blood, and suffering. It is āimpure but morally acceptable,ā according to him.
āSomebodyās got to do the dirty work. Other peopleās dirty work. Nobody wants to do that sort of thing. Thatās why God put guys like you and me on this earth.ā
He has made peace with this because he treats the cows with kindness. He soothes them as they enter his cube, and he blesses them with the sign of the cross moments before he gives them a mallet to the skull. He believes the animals do not suffer.
"He's not proud of what he does, but if someone has to do it, then let it be him, who has pity on those irrational beasts.ā
While death, and perhaps even suffering, are natural, Edgar is in a business that extracts maximum profits from that death and suffering. They pay their employees very little, despite the back-breaking work, and the men canāt even afford to eat the product they help produce! In a way, the men are not that different from the cows they are killing. Edgar often describes seeing himself in the cows ā literally, he sees his own reflection in their black eyes the moment before their death. They are both being exploited for profit.
"Two enclosures, one for cattle, and one for men, standing side-by-side."
It really makes you consider how we all have our individual moral compasses, our own understandings of right and wrong. For example, Edgar murders a co-worker for not stunning the cows properly and causing them to suffer. On the one hand, he kills somebody and throws their body in a river. But on the other⦠the guy was a total dick. We may view Edgarās moral code as confusing, but that is because human morality is often messy and contradictory ā especially under capitalism.
āThey adhere to a code of conduct, and they all stand facing the same direction while grazing. This sort of harmony is unheard of in men.ā
Like many of us, Edgar is trapped between adhering to his values and surviving the economic system weāre forced to live in. We can all moralize capitalism as much as we want, but the reality is, these men need jobs now. One of them pays for his daughter's eyeglasses by taking bets on how long he can hold his breath. There are starving families outside of the slaughterhouse begging for the cows that would otherwise go to waste, despite the risks of disease.
There is a moment where a young woman asks Edgar if he considers himself a murderer, to which he says yes. But when asked whether he is ashamed of it, he asks if she has ever eaten a hamburger and "how do you think it got there?" We have to consider that just because we keep distance between us and the bloody process, that doesn't make us any less complicit. Not to go Marxist on y'all's asses but this connects to his concept of alienation ā The workers are alienated from their labor (they can't afford what they produce). The consumer is alienated from the production (they don't see the nasty bits). The product is alienated from its origin (a hamburger does not resemble the cow).
Edgar does end up eating his first hamburger eventually. "Round and seasoned like that, they donāt even look like they had ever been a cow. Not one glimpse of the unbridled horror behind something so tender and delicious.ā
femaleprivilege finished a book

Of Cattle and Men
Ana Paula Maia
Post from the Of Cattle and Men forum
āThereāll always be a bunch of people willing to eat it. But not to kill it. Only folks like you and me, boy. Only folks like us.ā
femaleprivilege commented on a post
avoiding eye contact with the unread classics on my shelf as i grab another weird little book with less than 100 reviews⦠š

Post from the Of Cattle and Men forum
okayyy end of chapter one and iām already dropping my jaw?? itās gonna be a wild one i can tell
Post from the Of Cattle and Men forum
avoiding eye contact with the unread classics on my shelf as i grab another weird little book with less than 100 reviews⦠š

femaleprivilege finished a book

Famesick: A Memoir
Lena Dunham
femaleprivilege finished a book

Down the Drain
Julia Fox
femaleprivilege started reading...

Of Cattle and Men
Ana Paula Maia
femaleprivilege commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
Hello, all!
I just finished watching "Book reviews are gaslighting us" by Below the Fray on youtube. The central thesis of the video essay revolves around the soulless platitudes in most modern litcrit columns in newspapers and magazines. He brings up a lot of great points, and it made me think about non-monetized book reviews like those here on Pagebound.
My biggest question for you all is do you read (and/or write) negative reviews? I recently started writing negative reviews but have a bad habit of kneecapping my sentences and coddling the author more than I probably should. I am a firm believer that reviews are for readers and criticism is for the authors, though where exactly else are these authors to get criticism from if most modern litcrit is monetized and a bad review could get you fired or blacklisted?
As readers, do you enjoy reading a bad review? Do you seek out alternative, often negative opinions of books you enjoy? Do you feel vindicated by a bad review on a book you hated? What kind of review gets you to read a book most: a raving 5 star or a critical 1 star review that piques your interest?
TL;DR Do you read negative reviews of books (whether you've read them or not), and what do you feel the purpose of a review on a platform like PB is, exactly?
Signed, a ranty reader lol
femaleprivilege is interested in reading...

A Good Person
Kirsten King
femaleprivilege commented on a post
femaleprivilege is interested in reading...

The Count of Monte Cristo
Alexandre Dumas