4.57 average · 282 reviews
Click a segment to filter

Frankenstein can be read through just about any lens you want, from feminist (no women, no morals) to a critique of capitalism (the industrial age has gone too far and flouts the laws of nature) and, especially with the 1818 edition, it can be read through a biographical lens. I went into this as clueless as I could but it was not hard to see the anger and loneliness of the Creature as an abandoned child that Mary likely felt herself to be. It's so fascinating to see that this early sci-fi does what some of the best modern sci-fi does by reflecting back the worst aspects of its contemporary society by asking what really makes a monster?
I have so many swirling thoughts about this, so I will do my best to record them here but I may come back to edit/add. I read and recommend the 2018 Penguin edition (featuring the 1818 text) since the introduction is quite good and it comes with a selection of related writing (including some from Mary Wollstonecraft's A Vindication of the Rights of Woman and Mary Shelley's personal correspondence).

Bunny
Mona Awad

miarboretum commented...
I heard the phrase “I liked the book so much that read it cover to cover” as a kid and I really took it to heart. I read everything, acknowledgements, epigraphs, author’s note, etc. Not always strictly necessary but I’m a thorough person. However; to not read the prologue or epilogue is like saying you like to eat sandwiches but you take off the bread…even a lettuce wrap is wrapped IN the lettuce!!! I’m so confused, how is this a take?!?!
I don't know how many other people are active on the bookish side of Threads (I'm not really active, I just scroll on occasion), but there's a big debate going on right now with readers saying that they don't read prologues or epilogues.
I found this kind of crazy because I always read prologues and epilogues...in my mind, they're just as much a part of the story as all the other chapters. Some people were arguing that they don't read the author's notes, acknowledgments, or copyright pages, and prologues/epilogues are basically the same thing, but I'm inclined to disagree. Other arguments were that some epilogues will ruin otherwise 5-star books, that prologues are usually boring and don't give information that isn't revealed later as well, or that if they were important they'd be labeled like regular chapters.
What are your thoughts on this? Do you read prologues and epilogues? Is it a genre-specific thing to skip them?