avatar

miarboretum

interests include: ancient & medieval history, lit fic, dark academia, mysteries, and caffeinated beverages ☕️🫩🪴she/her

7123 points

0% overlap
Dark Academia
Quiet Novels
Made for the Movies
My Taste
The Secret History
The Idiot
Giant Days, Vol. 1
The Thursday Murder Club
A Fatal Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum: Murder in Ancient Rome
Reading...
Dead Beat
76%
The Odyssey
70%

October 2026

Shuggie BainMushishi Collector's Edition 2Sense and SensibilityModerationThe Inferno of Dante: A New Verse Translation (Bilingual Edition)Dead BeatClown Town

4.57 average  ·  282 reviews

Click a segment to filter

  • Nov 02, 2025
    Frankenstein
    FrankensteinMary Wollstonecraft Shelley
    4.0
    Enjoyment: 4.0Quality: 4.0Characters: 4.0Plot: 4.0

    Frankenstein can be read through just about any lens you want, from feminist (no women, no morals) to a critique of capitalism (the industrial age has gone too far and flouts the laws of nature) and, especially with the 1818 edition, it can be read through a biographical lens. I went into this as clueless as I could but it was not hard to see the anger and loneliness of the Creature as an abandoned child that Mary likely felt herself to be. It's so fascinating to see that this early sci-fi does what some of the best modern sci-fi does by reflecting back the worst aspects of its contemporary society by asking what really makes a monster?

    I have so many swirling thoughts about this, so I will do my best to record them here but I may come back to edit/add. I read and recommend the 2018 Penguin edition (featuring the 1818 text) since the introduction is quite good and it comes with a selection of related writing (including some from Mary Wollstonecraft's A Vindication of the Rights of Woman and Mary Shelley's personal correspondence).

    1


  • avatar
    miarboretum posted...
    Edited
    spoilers
    27w
    Bunny

    Bunny

    Mona Awad

    Something I’m noticing on my re-read from 4% (ch 2, pg 11)
    31
    5

  • avatar

    miarboretum commented...

    I heard the phrase “I liked the book so much that read it cover to cover” as a kid and I really took it to heart. I read everything, acknowledgements, epigraphs, author’s note, etc. Not always strictly necessary but I’m a thorough person. However; to not read the prologue or epilogue is like saying you like to eat sandwiches but you take off the bread…even a lettuce wrap is wrapped IN the lettuce!!! I’m so confused, how is this a take?!?!

  • Prologue/Epilogue Debate

    I don't know how many other people are active on the bookish side of Threads (I'm not really active, I just scroll on occasion), but there's a big debate going on right now with readers saying that they don't read prologues or epilogues.

    I found this kind of crazy because I always read prologues and epilogues...in my mind, they're just as much a part of the story as all the other chapters. Some people were arguing that they don't read the author's notes, acknowledgments, or copyright pages, and prologues/epilogues are basically the same thing, but I'm inclined to disagree. Other arguments were that some epilogues will ruin otherwise 5-star books, that prologues are usually boring and don't give information that isn't revealed later as well, or that if they were important they'd be labeled like regular chapters.

    What are your thoughts on this? Do you read prologues and epilogues? Is it a genre-specific thing to skip them?

    39
    103