avatar

mireilles

110 points

0% overlap
Level 2
My Taste
Orlando
Against Interpretation and Other Essays
Tomorrow, and Tomorrow, and Tomorrow
Cantor's Dilemma
Giovanni's Room
Reading...
Klara and the Sun
15%
Small Is Beautiful
0%
The Doctor's Dilemma: A Tragedy (Shaw Library)
0%
Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient
0%
East of Eden
0%
  • Piranesi
    Aug 27, 2026
    PiranesiSusanna Clarke
    4.5
    Enjoyment: 5.0Quality: 5.0Characters: 4.5Plot: 4.0
    0
  • Martyr!
    Aug 03, 2026
    Martyr!Kaveh Akbar
    4.5
    Enjoyment: 4.0Quality: 5.0Characters: 5.0Plot: 3.5
    0
  • Intermezzo
    Jun 10, 2026
    IntermezzoSally Rooney
    3.5
    Enjoyment: 3.5Quality: 4.5Characters: 4.0Plot: 3.0

    Intermezzo includes many of the Sally Rooney signatures—sex as a plot device, the Dublin housing crisis essentially being its own character, young adults at their messiest—and does them well. It touches on different layers of grief and does so in beautiful prose. But did it also fall slightly flat in it’s plot and character development, ultimately leaving something wanting? Unfortunately, yes.

    0
  • Giovanni's Room
    May 09, 2026
    Giovanni's RoomJames Baldwin
    5.0
    Enjoyment: 5.0Quality: 5.0Characters: 4.0Plot: 5.0
    0
  • Think Again: How to Reason and Argue
    Apr 05, 2026
    Think Again: How to Reason and ArgueWalter Sinnott-Armstrong
    4.5
    Enjoyment: 4.5Quality: 4.0Characters: Plot:
    0
  • avatar

    mireilles finished a book

    22w

    Think Again: How to Reason and Argue

    Think Again: How to Reason and Argue

    Walter Sinnott-Armstrong

    Our personal and political worlds are rife with arguments and disagreements, some of them petty and vitriolic. The inability to compromise and understand the opposition is epidemic today, from countries refusing to negotiate, to politicians pandering to their base. Social media has produceda virulent world where extreme positions dominate. In most of these disagreements, parties yell at each other, very little progress is made, and the end result is a hardening (or further widening) of positions. There is however, such a thing as 'good' arguments. Arguments that offer reasons onboth sides can ultimately allow for some mutual understanding and respect, and even if neither party is convinced by the other, the possibility of compromise can result. Sinnott-Armstrong's book shows the importance of good arguments and reveals common misunderstandings about them. Many people see an argument just as a means to persuade other people or beat them in an intellectual competition. Sinnott-Armstrong sees them as much more essential-as a means to play aconstructive role in the way we interact with each other. He shows the way out of the impasse by introducing readers to what makes a good argument. In clear, lively, and practical prose, and using plentiful examples from politics, popular culture, and everyday life, he introduces the reader totopics such as: what defines an argument; the role that reasons play in arguments; the pieces that make up good arguments; what arguments can accomplish effectively; the difference between essential terms like deductive, inductive, and abductive in creating an argument; and how to spot fallacies inothers' arguments. Armed with these tools, Sinnott-Armstrong wants readers to be able to spot bad reasoning and bad arguments, and to advance their own view in a forceful and logical way-with an eye toward effective resolution of disputes.

    0
    avatar

    mireilles started reading...

    32w

    Think Again: How to Reason and Argue

    Think Again: How to Reason and Argue

    Walter Sinnott-Armstrong

    Our personal and political worlds are rife with arguments and disagreements, some of them petty and vitriolic. The inability to compromise and understand the opposition is epidemic today, from countries refusing to negotiate, to politicians pandering to their base. Social media has produceda virulent world where extreme positions dominate. In most of these disagreements, parties yell at each other, very little progress is made, and the end result is a hardening (or further widening) of positions. There is however, such a thing as 'good' arguments. Arguments that offer reasons onboth sides can ultimately allow for some mutual understanding and respect, and even if neither party is convinced by the other, the possibility of compromise can result. Sinnott-Armstrong's book shows the importance of good arguments and reveals common misunderstandings about them. Many people see an argument just as a means to persuade other people or beat them in an intellectual competition. Sinnott-Armstrong sees them as much more essential-as a means to play aconstructive role in the way we interact with each other. He shows the way out of the impasse by introducing readers to what makes a good argument. In clear, lively, and practical prose, and using plentiful examples from politics, popular culture, and everyday life, he introduces the reader totopics such as: what defines an argument; the role that reasons play in arguments; the pieces that make up good arguments; what arguments can accomplish effectively; the difference between essential terms like deductive, inductive, and abductive in creating an argument; and how to spot fallacies inothers' arguments. Armed with these tools, Sinnott-Armstrong wants readers to be able to spot bad reasoning and bad arguments, and to advance their own view in a forceful and logical way-with an eye toward effective resolution of disputes.

    0