stevenanteau wrote a review...
One of those "what's going on?" kind of books.
I won't bother explaining the plot or characters because they mostly don't exist. It's more of a "vibes" book about a guy wanting a girl, specters of nuclear war and an ice-pocolypse, armed guards and Kafkaesque corruption, and then weaving in and out of first person, third person, present, past, back to the present, and on and on.
The best parts were when it was just settled on the plot and moving through the interesting setting but all the spinning round and round got very tiresome and it took me 5 days to finish this relatively thin book.
There's something there, and if you wanted to marginalia the hell out of it and find all of the allusions, metaphors, and deep philosophies there's a lot to be found but I kept comparing it to The Woman in the Dunes by Kobo Abe with the same type of "nameless protagonist in a weathered Hell and a girl in danger in the middle" but had so much better structure and prose.
In the end, it was a'ight.
stevenanteau wrote a review...
The writing and dialogue are great, I really know the characters in and out, and the set up was bang pow bam but once the "hunt" started it all felt fairly anticlimactic. Big traps laid just to wash over in 2 sentences then on to the next. It felt, and is, thin and fun. I'd be willing to give another Parker novel a try.
stevenanteau wrote a review...
A classic I'm sure I'll come back to later with more appreciation.
The plot and characters are off the wall but I could never connect with the style and pacing. There would be long sections of one single incident with recursive dialogue and then a bambambam rapid fire series of events and it was hard to find the line other than the sad life of Hazel Motes.
stevenanteau left a rating...
A mandatory and utilitarian novel about the strip mining of the country and people becoming animals, animals becoming things, things becoming capital, capital becoming trash. The novelization of Marx mixed with survivalism that made me take walking breaks to cut the tension.
Every Joe Rogan dickhead who wants to return to the old times should have to read this book at gunpoint and write 700 word essays on the hubris of man and stare at the void for 72 hours uninterrupted.
I didn't laugh, I definitely cried, I hugged my air conditioning remote and played recordings of Lenin and the El Topo soundtrack.
Highly recommended.
stevenanteau wrote a review...
This is my first William Faulkner and it won’t be my last, but I’m pretty sure I picked wrong.
I went in not knowing what a Faulkner book even is, what the style is supposed to do, and it seems a story built out of holes. The world isn’t really explained to you. The meat of the book is the characters and interactions and dialogue, but it does become hard to follow because there are some characters who are never named and seen with many characters all talking over each other in slang and circular dialogue.
The whole thing revolves around people’s relationships with alcohol and the illegal world they get shoved into. Temple is a well-to-do high-class student who wants to be involved in that criminal world, and she winds up stuck in a part of the county populated by these criminal hillbillies. There’s a lot of commentary about class and survival, about how surviving is the thing that makes people criminals, and the part that hooked me is that Temple has so many chances to leave. She has people actively trying to get her out and she drags her feet, because she wants to be there. It’s bleak and dark in a way I liked.
The problem is the jumping. It moves character to character constantly and I lost the thread of who was talking to who and what any of them were actually trying to say. By the last third I had just lost the plot, right at the point where it felt like it was finally starting.
Three stars. It’s interesting, it’s not very long, and I want to know more about Temple. I believe there’s a sequel, so I’ll get there. This is a book I’d come back to in a few years with more Faulkner under my belt, and it isn’t one of his better-reviewed ones anyway. Not the place to start, but a fine novel.
stevenanteau wrote a review...
I’ll be upfront: my enjoyment of Ridley Walker got worse the longer it went on, and yes, it was the made-up language, which is probably the main reason you’ve heard of this book, that was a massive detriment to its longevity and readability.
The novel is a post-apocalyptic story set roughly 2,000 years after a nuclear war wiped out most of civilization. The remnants of humanity are left to pick up the pieces in a world that feels like the future from Terminator. Everything is decrepit, broken down, and roving packs of dogs attack anyone trying to survive day by day. Ridley Walker is a "connexion man," a kind of communicator and history keeper for a forgotten era. At the start, his father dies, and Ridley must take up the role.
The language is front and center from page one, it’s a devolved version of English, stripped of most grammar and crammed with mashed-together words. It’s gimmicky at first, but it doesn’t take long to figure out. By the third chapter, you’re breathing through it just fine. Mixed in are modern terms like "nuclear bomb" and "computer," but since the characters don’t know what those are, they’ve been reimagined as myth and legend.
I'm sorry to say this about a classic, but I wasn’t impressed. The language starts off as simple phonetic spellings, but by the fifth or sixth chapter, it just sounds like Jamaican Patois, or, worse, Jar Jar Binks.
The real problem is that this gimmick drags everything out as long as humanly possible. If a character needs to ask, “What are we gonna do to protect ourselves from the other gangs?” it becomes a multi-page slog that reads like five-year-olds mumbling at each other. Nothing gets accomplished. I kept waiting for a larger plot to unfold, but around Chapter 6, I hit a wall. I didn’t even want to read it anymore. Rather than sitting down for an hour, I could only take it in ten-minute bursts before getting bored and putting it down. It was impossible to build momentum.
There was still a story in there somewhere, but the language hampered it so much that the plot never got off the ground. It never found third or fourth gear. Any large action sequence felt kneecapped and all over the place, requiring multiple paragraph re-reads. Your experience may be completely different, but I could not get into this book.
I appreciate the effort, and I can see how this inspired Mad Max. Still, the language doesn’t lend itself to visual storytelling, especially in a book that has so much visual richness to offer.
Should it be on your TBR? If you’re a big sci-fi or dystopian lit fan, sure. But my enjoyment was severely hampered.
stevenanteau left a rating...
Nights Master is some of the best modern fairytales with demons, elves, long forgotten times, magic, talismans, etc. I’ve ever read.
The book is a set of fairytales mostly circling around the demon Azhrarn who lives in the Underearth. It is a time when the Earth is flat and the Gods have forgotten about, or downright regret, humanity and Azhrarn has free reign over Earth. The tales twist and morph with humans starting as victims and then becoming talking demons themselves, enacting revenge or showing compassion, like an Aeon Flux cartoon following a never ending line of killers. The imagery is vivid and never ending. Every river is laden with metal, every forest glowing, the sun sets and rises at the whims of curses, you could flip open to any random page and find a vista worthy of a Peter Jackson treatment.
It would take spoiler-laden paragraphs to explain all the characters at the center of these tales but it is never boring, it is always moving, as I said villains become heroes and back to villains again, and in the final third when I had that worry it was losing steam the status quo of the world gets flipped upside down and everything changes. The deepest philosophical creations happen in the final fifty pages that bring ideas themselves into existence and left me craving for more.
Reading it I kept thinking “these would be great Wishbone episodes”. It is horrifying, horny, captivating, wonderous, evil, serene, epic,Nights Master delivers it all. Massive recommendation.
stevenanteau left a rating...
Chamberlain's recounting of his years as a dragoon and then bounty hunter in the 1850's Southwest is a mad fish hole film reel of Hell on Earth. It is every bit was foreign and demonic as any fantasy novel. Living demons marching across the barren, burning hot landscape in search of women, whiskey, meat, and work and work usually meant murder for hire.
The first 2/3rds of the book is very straight forward, somewhat uneventful, and reads as any military record might. The prose is some of the best I've ever read and it is easy to pretend this is another Cormac McCarthy novel. His description of the scenery, the desert lands, the mountains, the rivers, the sunsets, are engrossing and breathtaking but it is the final third, the recounting of his time with the Glanton gang that formed the plotline for Blood Meridian, that is the main event.
I hate to sound naive but I was blown away at how much of Blood Meridian came from this book because it made the blood-soaked pages that much realer.
Eating donkeys, murdering fallen comrades out of pity, raids and battles leaving dozens dead, and the ghost of Judge Holden, pederast and all, standing over Chamberlain like the grim reaper pulling the strings of his army of heretics.
This journal is shocking and beautiful and reads better than any Western. Highly recommend.
stevenanteau commented on stevenanteau's review of The Fifth Head of Cerberus