avatar

ybbaybba

(👉゚ヮ゚)👉📚

1650 points

0% overlap
Badges5
Indigenous Peoples' Day 2026Cherry Blossom Festival 2026
Classics Starter Pack Vol I
My Taste
Thyme Travellers: An Anthology of Palestinian Speculative Fiction
Persuasion
The Bluest Eye
As Long as Grass Grows: The Indigenous Fight for Environmental Justice, from Colonization to Standing Rock
When the Moon Hits Your Eye
Reading...
Deep Fried Death (Country Store Mystery #12)
6%
The Convenience Store by the Sea
7%
Ocean, as Much as Rain: Stories, Lyrical Prose, and Poems from Tibet
47%
Beloved
8%

3.95 average  ·  65 reviews

Click a segment to filter

  • Jun 10, 2026
    Fetishized: A Reckoning with Yellow Fever, Feminism, and Beauty
    Fetishized: A Reckoning with Yellow Fever, Feminism, and BeautyKaila Yu
    ybbaybba's Book Journey
    2.0
    Enjoyment: Quality: Characters: Plot:

    I've been trying to wrap my head around and puts words to/organize my thoughts.

    TLDR - Multiple things can be true at the same time. I appreciate her story and voice, I felt for her, but I wish she had dug a little deeper (and took more accountability).

    I'll start with what I appreciated. I came into this book, initially, not knowing anything about Kaila Yu and when she said she used to model, I Googled her and realized I had actually seen her face/photos before. I appreciate her vulnerability and honestly. I don't think there are many memoirs/nonfiction books out there that are similar to hers, if that makes sense.

    There are a few points where she starts/started to lose me.

    -I wish she would have been more specific with "Asian." So many times throughout her story, she says things like "Our slanted 'almond eyes [...]" with "our" meaning "Asian," but not all Asians have "slanted almond eyes." It's almost feels like she forgets how big Asia is and truly just means East Asia and this is a recurring thing that happens within the East Asian community (I am also East Asian, Taiwanese-American like her).

    -Her memoir lacked focus. Two standout chapters to me were "Bad Asian" and "Slanted." I wish she dug a little more into those themes, but I'm also cognizant and aware that it's very traumatic and might even teeter on the line of becoming a "trauma porn" novel. She also mentioned her "domineering tiger mom" multiple times and I wished had talked more about her family and what produced the conditions of her "domineering tiger mom" or her own home life. Otherwise, it felt like "here's a little bit of this and that."

    -In "Lolitas," when she introduces her younger bandmates (Jamie + Kiki), it was all just very weird to me. She said, "Like a mama-san, I forced the younger girls to shift sexuality to the forefront. But the worst part was how much attention Jamie received without trying." Huh???? She does state, previously, that "By nature, I've always been jealous [...']" and if she had explored the root of that jealously and how come to "overcome" (?) it, I might have a little bit more understanding (MAYBE) for how she treated Jamie and Kiki -- the harm and danger she put them in. She doesn't really take accountability or address it either???? ALSO, she was pushing 30 years old in 2008 and I'm not saying she should have "known better," but that's kind of what I'm saying, BUT I also understand being 30 years old in 2008 is different than, say, 2018.

    -At the end of "Unicorn," she says, "It could have been me" and I just thought it was an odd thing to say about someone who died. I understand what she's trying to say, but definitely could have been framed better.

    -I might have been a little more forgiving MAYBE if this had been released in 2021/2022, but I feel that in recent years there have been more conversations being brought up in the East Asian community about fetishization, use of "Asian" when people really mean just "East Asian," how US military occupation and displacement impact everything -- maybe it's just my algorithm -- etc. that her memoir could have been so much stronger had someone (multiple people) with this nuance reviewed her book. In "Not Lucy Liu," she says how stereotypes reduce "us into a monolith," but she [Kaila] also kind of does the same thing (reducing to monoliths). Again, had some more people with nuance reviewed it, the connection and articulation between her story and argument would be stronger.

    -I feel like she has/had an obsession with Sung-Hi (and other people) and C cups that is important to her story, but I'm not understanding it yet.

    I am having trouble discerning whether I over-scrutinized her because, as a fellow Taiwanese-American, I just want more for our diaspora. I expect and want us to think deeper. I want us to go below surface level and reflect about why things are the way they are. I want us to learn to be curious. OR if others also share the same sentiments and thoughts as I.

    0


  • Small Boat

    Small Boat

    Vincent Delecroix

    Thoughts from 25% (page 26)

    "So we back we came to me again, and the idea that the cause of their death was -- me. In other words, not the sea, not migration policy, not the trafficking mafia, not the war in Syria or the famine in Sudan -- me. My judgement, to be precise [...]."

    This quote sparked something in my brain and while the current narrator, in my opinion, feels a bit apathetic and disconnected, there is a point to bring out in what she's saying here. I see the angle at which she, or individuals in general, are almost used as scapegoats. There are much bigger issues and reasons as to why there is, for example, a famine in Sudan -- it's not her as an individual, but global politics and imperialism and the U.S. and sanctions, etcetera etcetera.

    It's these things that pushed these migrants out of their homelands and lead them to embark on such a perilous journey and there's not really a way to tangibly imprison or punish these "things" in the imperialist and capitalist framework we are in. Thus, I can understand why the narrator is feeling unjustly accused in a way, though I don't think she is absolved of responsibility, so I guess it goes back to the question of complicity that is mentioned in the book's description.

    Not sure if I articulated that well, but I'm just having so many thoughts right now!

    EDIT: just also wanted to add this other thought I've been having is the complicity and maybe even hypocrisy(?) of the police investigator. I'm not sure what the outcome was/is/will be for the migrants who survived. Were they able to receive asylum or were they punished and deported by the same legal system the police investigator is working within? Then the police investigator becomes one that is seeking justice (?) for migrants who died and also the one punishing the migrants who survived.

    I'm not really clear on what role of the police investigator is, so this thought is coming with assumptions and my own perceptions of what a police investigator is.

    7
    1