BookishDragonfly TBR'd a book

The Awakened Kingdom and Other Stories (The Inheritance Trilogy, #0.5, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5)
N.K. Jemisin
BookishDragonfly is interested in reading...

Red Dirt Witch: A Graphic Novel
N.K. Jemisin
BookishDragonfly is interested in reading...

Emergency Skin
N.K. Jemisin
BookishDragonfly TBR'd a book

Instinct (Chronicles of Nick, #6)
Sherrilyn Kenyon
BookishDragonfly commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
I've been thinking about this after looking at my ratings for a few years and seeing that I give very, very few 5 star ratings.
I know what the reason is. Books that have a significant impact on me, on how I think about life, literature, art, and the like...books that I am still thinking about long after I turn the last page...those get 5 stars from me. They're at the top. It makes a certain sense, then, that books that don't reach that level of impact but that I nevertheless enjoyed (sometimes a great deal) can only be 4 or 4.5 (depending on whether the site allows half stars) or lower.
Of course, not every book is meant to impact me in the way described above. Some books are meant just to entertain, to be light, and I enjoy those books a lot. I've thought about adjusting my rating system such that each book is rated in the context of what that book is trying to achieve. But star ratings don't allow for any granularity, so I still lean more toward the system I've been using (where 3 and above is a good rating).
What do you all do? If a life-changing work of art gets a 5 from you, does something that falls short of that automatically come in below 5 stars or might a gripping thriller that you loved but won't remember in a year also qualify for a 5 based on the fun you had?
BookishDragonfly commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
There are many people on this app I have yet to meet. But unfortunately I cannot go onto everybody’s profile and see what they’re reading. So I would like to ask you: what are you reading at the moment? And how do you like it?
I am currently reading:
Bury our bones in the midnight soul: I’m liking this a lot so far, I’m 37 percent through. The writing is pleasant and smooth, but unfortunately my attention has gone to another book I’m currently reading…
As good as dead: the 3rd book in the a good girls guide to murder series. I loved the first two and finished them so fast, I devoured them lol XD I am loving this as well, unfortunately i am just a tiny bit hesitant to read more and finish because I don’t want this series to finish hehe.
The poppy war: the book that has been stealing my attention, it’s not what I expected so far, but I’m constantly at the edge of my seat in preparation for a twist to happen. I’m loving this as well
So for me, reading is going quite well, but how about you? 👀
BookishDragonfly is interested in reading...

The Once and Future Witches
Alix E. Harrow
BookishDragonfly wrote a review...
View spoiler
BookishDragonfly finished a book

Evocation
S.T. Gibson
Post from the They Were Her Property: White Women as Slave Owners in the American South forum
Currently in Chapter 2 which is titled “I Belong to de Mistress.”
I find myself having competing yet not necessarily opposing thoughts while reading this chapter. I am also wrestling with a lot of different emotions while reading this and it’s making it a bit difficult to put my thoughts in any type of coherent order. So apologies up front if this doesn’t make sense.
First and foremost, it really does sicken me just how comfortable these folks were with the owning and subjugation of other human beings. This is an ongoing thought and feeling I will have throughout this entire book. If I never hear “For her sole and separate use” ever again it will be too soon. Being bequeathed to someone as a wedding gift or an inheritance the same way you would inherit fine china or jewelry, in my opinion, shows a moral destitution of such massive proportions, it’s no wonder that the remnants of slavery still poison our society today.
Secondly, I also find myself admiring the way the women of that time made sure to own their own property and teach their daughters how to maintain the ownership of that property (I say this while also acknowledging and detesting that a lot of time this “property” was other human beings). Women often separated their finances from their husbands because the men were stupid, to put it plainly. Its interesting how there is this notion that “women” in general are seen as emotional, less smart, and of frail constitution, and yet they could manage the household, the finances and run a plantation successfully, without the input or help of a man. They did this in order to ensure their protection and livelihood. All of this would be impressive and GREAT, if their “property” wasn’t my damn ancestors!
BookishDragonfly commented on BookishDragonfly's update
BookishDragonfly is interested in reading...

Daggerbound
T. Kingfisher