Post from the Pagebound Club forum
I recently finished Metro 2033— I say, with Pagebound telling me that it's been more than a week already. Since then I've finished The Three-Body Problem and considered several other reads. Never started, of course, and for the simple reason of digestion. Hidden in the landscape of my reading habits, Killing Commendatore has sat for neither a long period nor short stint. I didn't forget about it; I certainly couldn't have forgotten about it. More than anything, it's a book that feels like it required more time to digest. Annotate, reread— there's plenty of ways that the experience is manifest. It has just lead me to the point of curiosity, to how other people might experience similar scenarios. Does it result in a slump, a forever unfinished read that you promise to return to but might not? I wouldn't say I have an unbreakable commitment to a book from the moment I flip it open, but I would similarly say that my habits certainly reflect on that commitment. Hardly ever in a consistent way from an external perspective I feel, but something that I can verbalize, at the very least. For example I— relatively speaking— flew through Metro 2033, a novel with a page count north of 450, in three days. The Three-Body Problem with a similar page count, took around 4 days. Killing Commendatore while a monstrous book, should be beholden to similar conjecture. However, I've been at it for well over a month at this point. The book has haunted me in a way that I just can't quite seem to grasp. Metro 2033, while far from straightforward with a lot of its appeal to horror and otherworldly interactions, continuously drove me forward to its conclusion. The Three-Body Problem had me gripped earlier on but became something of a chore; the more I attempted to glean from it, the more it began to result in a contractual completion of the novel. Killing Commendatore fits neither the famished desire of the former nor the dispassionate angle of the latter, but in a twist it takes the longest time and sees me depart from it for periods of time in which I can read multiple books. It's something that feels quite interesting to me, and has had me curious as to how other people might experience similar feelings and habits. Do you have novels that can take an inordinate amount of time to complete, as if there's a wall in front of you that no matter how hard you push, it won't come down? Something wherein you can see the other side and desire to travel to it, but are unable to find your feet beneath you at an exact or predetermined moment?
Brandon_Bound wants to read...
Stay True
Hua Hsu
Brandon_Bound commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
I've noticed something in the book community. Every time people say to read diversely, they always recommend 1 specific author from every community. Like for Asian authors, it's R.F Kuang. For Black authors, it's Tracy Deonn. Etc. They are treated almost like token non-white authors. And when people claim they have a diverse bookshelf they point to like 5 books by their token authors. Compared to the 80 books by their favorite white authors. And that's what makes me mad. It's like. You only try different perspectives when it's from those authors. And then you pat yourself on the back every Black History Month or Asian Heritage Month because you spotlighted that token author. Nobody else. Just them. So many other Asian authors and Black authors, but you only spotlight their work. And then when it's time to sneer at people who don't read diversely (which I support because how is that possible? You have to actively seek only white stories for that to happen), they act like they are somehow different from them because those 5 books made you so cultured and knowledgeable so you don't need to read anything other than white perspectives forever because you "did the work." Not saying that BIPOC authors are required reading but I feel like it's weird to never branch out and try different stories. I'm not Indian but one of my favorite books of all time is an Indian fantasy. Because it's genuinely a good book with love and thought put in. I feel like it's stupid to limit yourself and stupid to only engage with a select few from a minority group and ignore what everyone else has to say or share. Even within Black authors, there are so many perspectives. African perspectives, Caribbean perspectives, African American perspectives, and Afro-Latino Perspectives. Don't forget queerness and womanhood which adds more to the book. Like I feel like it's dumb to not acknowledge what everyone else has to say. Plus you don't even need to try to read diversely. It takes more effort to not honestly. Idk that's just me.
Brandon_Bound commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
I've read: Year of Magical Thinking by Joan Didion Blue Nights by Joan Didion Invention of Solitude by Paul Auster Smoke Gets in Your Eyes: And Other Lessons from the Crematory by Caitlin Doughty I love reading, I have a very peaceful and (I'd like to think) healthy outlook on my own mortality, and I know it's my mom's time to go. I just turned 30, and she's only 58, but send me other recommendations. Especially any like American Way of Death by Jessica Mitford (also on my tbr). I like reading while I'm sitting with her, and I'm finding it difficult to focus on fiction at the moment. Thinking something more central to what we're experiencing could actually be useful.
Brandon_Bound commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
hey guys! I'm relatively new to reading but I've always wanted to read books that give off the same vibes as Cyberpunk 2077 or Blade runner 2047. And, maybe something like that one episode from Love, Death and Robots with the spider 🕷(ifykyk). I really loved Annihilation aswell, so anything sci-fi horror would be great too!
Brandon_Bound commented on LUNETH_III's review of Life with an Ordinary Guy Who Reincarnated into a Total Fantasy Knockout Vol. 7
Brandon_Bound commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
I recently heard about this and I am intrigued. I really want to read some. And honestly, it makes sense that it’s a thing. I feel like I’d love it because I adore the Cloverfield movies and those feel like they apply to the genre. Problem is that I have no idea where to start. I tried seeing if someone made a list and there isn’t one so I’d love to hear some recommendations (also if anyone does create a list, please let me know!)
Brandon_Bound wants to read...
Sisyphean
Dempow Torishima
Brandon_Bound commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
I usually have a system for which books I'm gonna read for the year, but it changes yearly. In 2023 each month had a color theme so that the covers could be cohesive in each month. In 2024 I followed a pattern of fiction, fantasy, magical realism/paranormal for the whole year. And this year each cover follows like a color gradient so all the covers flow. Does anyone else do something similarly specific when picking their books, or is it usually just mood reading?
Brandon_Bound finished reading and wrote a review...
For those that enjoy thunderstorms, there's a certain satisfaction in following lightning to its conclusion as a clap of thunder; seeing the ethereal streak of light illuminate the sky in its jagged pattern, and being jolted back to reality by the thunderous roar of the sky being torn apart. As a novel, The Three-Body Problem attempts to match this cadence. Liu builds up an incredible and out-there experience through the first third of the novel, but clumsily stages a world-shattering thunderclap before subsequently delivering simple noise followed by a quiet whimper. It's not shameful, but it's certainly disappointing. The initial allure of the work is nowhere to be found by the midpoint, and the final moments have you question whether or not you are still, in fact, reading the same novel. Its foundations no longer appear the same, and the only piece that ties it together is its name. You could just about place any other precursor in front of the back half of The Three-Body Problem, and it would still read the same. In that sense, maybe it's myself who is at least a little ashamed— if only for having such high expectations leading into things. Liu's nose for science fiction *is* quite intriguing, but as the story wears on, Liu struggles (or rather, shrugs the ability) to create a proper balance between the hefty sci-fi explanations and the actual narrative; symbiosis breaks down and you're left with two separate aspects of a narrative that just cannot find a way to come back together. When taking a look at the following sequels to this novel, it makes something resembling sense. The electric and dense atmosphere of the beginning must be spread thin enough to coalesce around not one but three very large books. It's a gargantuan task that the initial scope just simply cannot provide. If The Three-Body Problem was about a third— or even close to half— the size it is currently, and it ended on a reveal described in the synopsis (an absolute travesty of a synopsis, I must add), it would be a wonderful novel: a tense and otherworldly read that challenges reality on a scale that is hard to quantify. However, Liu very much attempts that task later on and as expected produces this work that just comes up short.
Brandon_Bound commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
Everyone has a favourite genre but what is your niche in that genre. For me my favouite genre is crime but within that i have a whole shelf of Japanese crime novels. Anyone has a very specifc group of books you will always buy?
Post from the The Three-Body Problem (Remembrance of Earth’s Past, #1) forum
While I had a strong inkling coming into the novel (partly in thanks to its poor synopsis), it feels as though Liu is coming a bit undone towards the crescendo of The Three-Body Problem. It’s not necessarily that an inflated page count is a strike against a work, but in many cases you can discern whether it’s a good sign or a bad omen. The further I strike out into this work, the more it resembles the latter. There are truly excellent pieces that exude Liu’s science fiction talent, that can illuminate their ability to deliver a perspective entirely foreign to the West. In the same breath though, it quickly becomes a stomping ground for Liu to flex their reality-based knowledge. Not necessarily a bad thing, but with how cut-and-dry the “present day” section of the story is you’re left with a desire to eschew weighty descriptions and notations as you gravitate towards those things that can't quite fit into diction alone. Liu further proves that when wielding reality-based concepts and information they can provide those emotions and experiences, but for some confounding reason they choose to leave them confined to only a section of the work rather than making use of them throughout. All in all it’s still far from bad, but it loses out on a great deal of its potential; lunging at loose threads in an attempt to create a bigger picture instead of tenderly taking hold of a handful and pursuing them to their ends, The Three-Body Problem diverges from its punchy and arresting beginnings, is slumping into something (unfortunately) more traditional.
Brandon_Bound commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
I used to only focus on one book at a time but lately I feel like I'm always reading 2/3 books at the same time and depending on the mood it's the book I'll read that day. But then once I'm half-way down one book, I usually just focus on that one until I finish it. Right now I'm reading The Hunting Wives, Trunk Music and Bitten. I got about 1/3 on each but now I'll full focused on The Hunting Wives, probably gonna continue with the others once I finish this one.
Brandon_Bound wants to read...
Technofeudalism: What Killed Capitalism
Yanis Varoufakis
Brandon_Bound wants to read...
Audition
Ryū Murakami
Brandon_Bound wants to read...
Petersburg Tales: New Translation: Newly Translated and Annotated / Includes the Diary of a Madman (Alma Classics Evergreens)
Nikolai Gogol
Brandon_Bound commented on a post
I’m really enjoying the story so far but I just wanted to know if im missing anything if I don’t know much about physics. I feel like I have a general idea of what’s going on so far but I wanted to get others input!
Post from the The Three-Body Problem (Remembrance of Earth’s Past, #1) forum
While I've got a bit of a funny relationship with Cixin Liu, having read adaptations of separate works, I never actually took the plunge into The Three-Body Problem previously. I'm unsure why, but I'm here now. Unfortunately, for would-be readers the synopsis sort of ruins the "surprise". Very quickly you can see where the aim lies when simply reading the book, but by the same token it lifts up the veil prematurely and can really take away from the surreal experience of Liu's slowly unfolding story. Though that's also not to say that the astute can glean this truth simply from the words of Liu himself. The author is very adept at providing a guiding hand without imposing too much on the story itself. Emotions still run deep, characters act with reasonable agency and humanity, and so on and so forth. In more clear-cut terms, it's an incredibly well-orchestrated production that will bring you to the answer all the same. However, knowing the answer and coming to the answer yourself are two different experiences. Unfortunate for certain, but on the whole Liu's book still remains impeccably put together as a read (so far).
Brandon_Bound started reading...
The Three-Body Problem (Remembrance of Earth’s Past, #1)
Liu Cixin
Brandon_Bound commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
I haven't read any of his works yet, I tried but couldn't get into. But I often heard that his descriptions of women are very sexualised and one-dimensional. Do you think it is true ? Does it get better or worse with time ? Which are his books where it is less or not the case ?