Brandon_Bound commented on a post


As the title states, I'm curious as to what other people envision as the Isekai genre. It "used to" be considered a sub genre, but over its years of tenure has developed into a fully fleshed out section of fiction for light novels (complete with its own host of sub genres).
Typically, the agreed upon rules are that more than one "inhabitable world" must exist, and for one reason or another the main character is moved, or can move themselves, between these worlds. The question is, how rigid must that (as well as subsequent) restriction(s) be.
If there are no restrictions, series like Bleach (though not a light novel in its mainline story) can fall under the Isekai umbrella, but most people understand it to not be. My argument is for the fact that Ichigo primarily inhabits his original world. But then when you consider a work like I'm Standing On A Million Lives, or Sword Art Online (an actual isekai) the idea of boundaries becomes a little less clear.
All in all, it makes me curious as to how people might attempt to provide a concrete description for Isekai- which is an actual word in the English language (according to the Oxford Dictionary) as of March 2024. Intuitively, we seem to have a collective understanding, but I've found it interesting to try and put into words.
Brandon_Bound commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
Is anyone else hopping on the Personal Curriculum bandwagon? If so - what subjects are you "studying" and which books are you reading to the purpose? I am fascinated by this trend!
EDIT: Forgot to include the subjects I'm personally working on! EDITEDIT: And the books I'm reading!!
HISTORY:
CREATIVITY:
RELIGION:
Brandon_Bound commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
I don’t know if everyone already knows this and I’m just behind the times, but I just found out that Kuang has signed a deal with HarperCollins for 4 new books, including two fantasy novels and two literary novels. She has a new book coming out next year called “Taipei Story”
Brandon_Bound commented on Brandon_Bound's update
Brandon_Bound DNF'd a book

The Spellshop
Sarah Beth Durst
Brandon_Bound DNF'd a book

The Spellshop
Sarah Beth Durst
Brandon_Bound commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
As an introduction to myself: I studied English in college. Studying rhetorical devices and strategies, their impact on texts in accomplishing an author's purpose, and the impact of literature on society is what I formally studied. That's why I comment on books the way I do. I was trained and given a specific set of tools for understanding and commenting on literature.
I'm noticing that one of the words often colloquially used to describe and classify books is "trope." I'm not here to say that's wrong. But I would like to share what it means in a literary context so we can understand each other better. I know we rely on Google and search engines to find information, and I'm hoping that by sharing some of this information, it will help you in your quest to find the books you're looking for.
A trope, in the traditional sense, is a rhetorical strategy where an author uses words in ways that differ from their literal meaning. A metaphor is a trope. All kinds of irony would be tropes. Idioms are tropes. When language ceases to be literal and becomes figurative, that is a trope.
How the meaning has changed happened when certain uses of tropes became overdone. Then it came to mean 'hack behavior by a certain type of writer or artist.' Now its meaning is shifting again from something that is overdone to almost a kind of classifier. Once something is done (or overdone) enough to become a feature, people are now calling that a trope.
Language changes. I'm not a prescriptivist. I'm not here to tell you that how you're using trope is wrong. I'm here to explain how you arrived at where you are, and why there will be confusion. We've got two groups of people, both in book spaces, using the same word to mean two very different things.
So when people wanted to identify a feature in a story or a body of literature for the purposes of classifying them together, what was that called before "trope" started serving in that function?
It was (and still is) called a motif. And once a motif happens enough to become a dominant feature within a genre, it becomes a subgenre. So "found family" on its own is a motif. It can happen independently across genres. "Time Travel" has been a motif for so long, it has developed conventions and motifs of its own. It has become its own subgenre that straddles science fiction and fantasy, depending on which of those motifs are present.
Many of the subgenres you love aren't new. They have existing names from the groups who were reading them for decades (and even centuries) before you. Humans have been classifying them together, like with like, during literary movements with genre/category names of their own. Once you tap into what these subgenres are called, you can easily find more books similar to the ones you like. And the classification of subgenre is a process that still continues today. You shape them with your reading habits, with the elements of story you search for and prioritize in the exact conversations you're having.
"Cozy" I think used to be a setting and tone motif that is quickly becoming its own subgenre, especially as it crosses multiple genres (mystery and fantasy), each with their own conventions and expectations. And many of the "tropes" people look for are motifs and literary elements that are making up those new subgenres. And I think part of why "tropes" stuck for this function is that tropes can cross strict genre boundaries in ways that we might be tempted to say that subgenres can't.
But there can be infinite numbers of subgenres, and they cross genre boundaries all the time now. You can also make up your own. This is a process that doesn't just belong to academics. It belongs to the communities reading the books. And it's something I think readers today have a much better sense of now than when I was in school. And because of how connected we are, they are being created faster than ever before.
I didn't know that Iron Widow was Silkpunk, or that Emily Wilde was Epistolary Fantasy. But now that I know that, I can find other books like them. And that's really neat.
Brandon_Bound commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
I just found out about this amazing genre! Apparently it's a mix of Chinese culture, fantasy and BL ... I think. If any of you knows more about it or have any novel suggestions, please comment!!! 😁
Brandon_Bound finished reading and wrote a review...
An incredibly strong showing from Dazai as a debut (published) work. It's "stream of consciousness" approach is perfect for the themes of growth, uncertainty, grief, and many others that the schoolgirl projects as if frozen in that single day.
While undoubtedly carrying the more depressive and grim existence of Dazai, Schoolgirl forms an opinion surprisingly more separate from the rest of Dazai's body of works in spite of some of their similarities. In particular, its message presented as a monologue at the end of the novel retains an impressively positive spin from the author.
In between its opening and ending, Dazai fits all manner of critique and irony, ranging from implicit discussion of sexism and its perpetrators (a commendable feat for the 30s in Japan) to a disapproving nod to Japanese Imperialism; the schoolgirl dances with uncertainty through her usual moments in a way that feels as though she specifically caters them to the reader.
An impossibly short read for the value that Dazai imparts, Schoolgirl remains an emotional roller coaster that still manages a valuable and relatable message while getting close to being a century old. While it's far from the greatest heights of Dazai's works, this short novella is something that I still hold in high regard and close to my chest.
Post from the Pagebound Club forum
To kick off the (Thanksgiving, to Canadians) weekend, I've posted the discussions questions for the Schoolgirl read along in the forums. While I cheated a little and got ahead on my re-read to create these discussion questions, I found it incredibly fun to come up with them, and also interesting to find that there's really no proper resource for finding other discussion groups or questions. I would have thought that for an author such as Dazai, and for his debut work that's so dense (yet short), there would be something hanging out somewhere on the internet. Alas, I was left high and dry and had to come up with them all on my own.
As an addition though, anybody that's previously read Dazai is also welcome to answer the discussion questions (of course). I will also be keeping an eye on reviews and thoughts in the forum this weekend for those that aren't interested in the discussion questions.
Brandon_Bound commented on a post
Post from the Schoolgirl forum
Brandon_Bound commented on a post
Whenever we talk about colonialism we tend to think about England or Spain… but what Belgium has done to Africa is unacceptable, and I feel we don’t talk about this enough, how are this countries not being held responsible for the devastation they brought, the DRC was not “independent” until 1960 and in this 65 years they have not been able to land on their feet, I’m just astonished about all this. Feeling sad ☹️
Post from the The Lilac People forum
It feels very silly to post so quickly after my prior thoughts, but I am just so impressed with how wild and unkempt Todd's writing is.
One moment the dialogue is electric and witty, a scene dancing to life in your imagination before the next appears and trots out a, "uh, that just happened" MCU-esque quip. Quality of the writing aside, the tone deafness feels astonishing, leaving me with little direction for my overall opinion of the novel.
Brandon_Bound commented on Arti_13's update
Arti_13 started reading...

Rashomon and Other Stories
Ryūnosuke Akutagawa
Brandon_Bound commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
What do you think ?
Before Pagebound (and still now), I write on a little notebook my thoughts on the book when I finished it + general things like "putting it this way was really good" or "oh, the author did a great job at this". And after coming here, I tend to put all of this in writing as the review of the book. But sometimes it feels more like something I should write as the last Thoughts.
So what do you guys write as a review ? How to know what should be in thoughts and could be included in review ?
I guess it could depend and I could do as I feel but I still want to know your opinion!
Brandon_Bound commented on a post
Post from the The Lilac People forum
Right away, Todd has certainly done a commendable effort on the research front— a real wealth of great information in regards to pre-war Germany and its view of the characters this story focuses on.
My only real gripes are the following two points. First, Todd's sense of pacing is questionable. Secondly, their switch between time periods is also questionable, in particular to how it relates to pacing.
There's a specific sequence a couple dozen pages in which was just absolutely electric writing, and on its own improved my opinion of the novel greatly. The opening is painfully slow, and serves little purpose for being the opening.
In addition, the introduction introduces us to the present, but very quickly spirits us away to the past. Its of little use since we're in the present for far too little time. We know next to nothing of the condition of the world, of how our characters have really experienced and managed through it, and all order of other things. You could chop the opening in half, or even add a number of pages to it, and it would work much better.
In short, it's a bit of an eye-rolling start, but once Todd actually explores social and political dynamics in an engaging atmosphere the novel kicks off in proper.
Additionally, given the time period I'd recommend looking into some reading on East vs West Germany and how American control shaped the reunification of the pair. Can't necessarily say how much it plays into the content of this novel (as I dont know how much takes place during this period), but as some additional information I'd think it valuable.
Brandon_Bound commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
Maybe i'm tired of AI everywhere in the world or maybe i've just read enough scifi that includes this trope to get really tired of it but when there's a universal translator used to get out of having characters learn new languages or sign and interpret each other its starting to really REALLY annoy me. Why do we never see the shitty real thing of a machine not being able to grasp the nuances of language and making funny or silly errors vs a person who makes the effort to learn the grammar/ culture/ etc. Not to be a cliche but that's what i loved so much about Babel (R.F Kuang) and the way it described translation as always imperfect and missing something. Anyway, anyone got some great scifi recs that engage with this trope in an interesting way or where it's avoided and characters have to do it the hard way and just LEARN?
Brandon_Bound started reading...

The Lilac People
Milo Todd
Brandon_Bound commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
hello I wanted to introduce myself; I got overly excited when I downloaded the app and went straight to the ratings and commentaries. I’m jenn, I’m 26 years old and these are some of my favorite things ❤️🔥
music: rauw alejandro, bad bunny, sabrina carpenter, tate mcrae, deftones, sade, bad gyal, bts, katesye, kaytranada & the weeknd (:
tv shows: the society, criminal minds, sex and the city, girlfriends, the vampire diaries, supernatural & abbott elementary
anime: nana, deathnote, hunter x hunter, jujutsu kaisen, solo leveling, kaiju no 8, tomo chan is a girl, spirited away, your name, apothecary diaries, not a married couple, spy family, classroom of the elite (:
kdrama: the glory, true beauty, my demon, my lovely runner, reply 1988, business proposal, weak hero class, extraordinary attorney woo, strong woman do bong soon, hotel de luna, weightlifting fairy Kim bok joo, family by choice!
Idk if it’s weird to say this but ever since this app came out I have felt a little less lonely. I guess knowing there’s a community here ready to discuss the books we hate or love is really wholesome. This app is doing wonders for my mental health (: I’d love to make more friends, I read mostly romance, fantasy, thriller & occasionally will dip into another genre for fun so feel free to follow me! excited to meet everyone 🧚🏼♀️