SashaStarlight is interested in reading...

My Brilliant Friend (The Neapolitan Novels, #1)
Elena Ferrante
SashaStarlight is interested in reading...

Chain of Ideas: The Origins of Our Authoritarian Age
Ibram X. Kendi
SashaStarlight is interested in reading...

Frederick Douglass: Prophet of Freedom
David W. Blight
SashaStarlight is interested in reading...

The Astral Library
Kate Quinn
SashaStarlight is interested in reading...

The Long Way to a Small, Angry Planet (Wayfarers, #1)
Becky Chambers
SashaStarlight is interested in reading...

High Conflict: Why We Get Trapped and How We Get Out
Amanda Ripley
SashaStarlight is interested in reading...

How Minds Change: The Surprising Science of Belief, Opinion, and Persuasion
David McRaney
SashaStarlight started reading...

SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome
Mary Beard
SashaStarlight is interested in reading...

Between Two Fires
Christopher Buehlman
SashaStarlight is interested in reading...

The Count of Monte Cristo
Alexandre Dumas
SashaStarlight is interested in reading...

Iron Widow (Iron Widow, #1)
Xiran Jay Zhao
SashaStarlight is interested in reading...

Jade City (The Green Bone Saga, #1)
Fonda Lee
SashaStarlight is interested in reading...

The Poppy War (The Poppy War, #1)
R.F. Kuang
SashaStarlight wrote a review...
Tl;dr: this is a quick and simple book with easy takeaways, and that’s a good thing. If you want something more complex, there are other great books, but that’s not what this book is trying to do.
I think too many people read this with the expectation that it’s going to be a deep and highly academic dissection of totalitarianism in the 20th century. It’s not. And that’s good. The majority of the people who need to read this wouldn’t if it was overly academic. It does in some cases draw connections that could be oversimplified. I don’t think they actually are, though. Snyder is drawing a comparison mainly between two totalitarian systems: the USSR and Nazi Germany, and that ruffles a lot of feathers because people think that just because the philosophies behind communism and nazism were different, it is wrong to compare the two. I understand the criticisms of horseshoe theory, but that doesn’t mean any and all comparison of both governments is irrelevant. In a quick and broad discussion, it is essential to examine their rises to power if we are going to avoid either outcome, especially when the similarities are the key.
If you want something more complex, then this may not be the book for you. But I think this is a valuable primer for most people.
SashaStarlight commented on crybabybea's review of On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century
On Tyranny is heavily neoliberal, relying on fearmongering and flattening of complex political theory. Snyder leans hard on horseshoe theory, equating communism with Nazism repeatedly.
Snyder is a Holocaust historian, but he doesn't mention that communists were some of the first people targeted by the Nazis, because he wants to paint the USSR as the ultimate threat and warn Americans against becoming it.
It’s all well and good to critique Nazis, Trump, and the USSR but kind of disingenuous to flatten them all into the same “totalitarian” umbrella. It’s giving red scare propaganda. He has some interesting points to make but his most useful information has been approached with more nuance and systemic analysis by scholars like Noam Chomsky, Naomi Klein, Paulo Freire, Frantz Fanon, etc.
The book’s heavy focus on individualism over collective organizing and systemic critique paints readers as vigilante superheroes destined to single-handedly save America from fascism by... checks notes voting, reading Harry Potter, and avoiding social media?
In the same individualistic vein, he positions Hitler and Trump as uniquely evil anomalies and not direct results of systems that are often bolstered by capitalism and imperialism. This is pretty common in liberal poli-sci books that refuse to actually critique the systems they exist in.
These two issues working in tandem translate into Snyder simultaneously flattening communism into the Soviet model and subtly implying that America has at any point in time been a democracy and not an imperialist empire built off of genocide and slavery. There’s also a certain irony to his advice revolving around fighting for free speech, standing up for your beliefs, and refusing to comply preemptively, but he can’t even call Trump by name.
I understand wanting a primer, something accessible for people to pick up and become politically engaged but I wouldn’t suggest this one. It helps alleviate the feelings of hopelessness that come from our current times by giving people things to reflect on, but it's only a short term relief. He doesn’t go far enough in addressing real systemic change, and doesn't give many tangible examples on what organizing against fascism actually looks like.
SashaStarlight finished a book

On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century
Timothy Snyder
SashaStarlight commented on a post
Sanderson's writing is amazing, but he can't persuade me that Vin is in love with Elend.
SashaStarlight commented on a post
SashaStarlight made progress on...
SashaStarlight made progress on...