femaelstrom commented on a post
(In reference to Lolita’s books) “Ridiculous books”
“In two years or so she would cease being a nymphet and would turn into a young girl, then into a college girl. That horror of horrors.”
IM YELLING. And people wonder why I’m so staunchly for women being educated and especially pursuing further studies or at least something that furthers intellectual pursuits and freedom. Even if not through traditional college because I understand how that’s definitely out of reach for many. Abusers target those who they see as uneducated and specifically try and keep their victims uneducated!!! The way it’s dotted throughout and certainly one of the reasons HH is disgusted by grown women says volumes. He WANTS an uneducated girl that doesn’t know better and has less life experience and education than him. To have otherwise would mean that he actually has to treat his partner(s) as an equal human being in their own right and he can’t stand that. The narcissism is WILD but so sickening because I’ve seen this play out many-a-time before. I genuinely applaud Nabokov for being able to write such a deplorable abusive narcissist. It’s a hard read, but well crafted. 😭
WOMEN. If your man doesn’t support your education pursuits, RUN. Even if he cites financial reasons which while valid, still isn’t right if he doesn’t offer an alternative education option nor support any research into other options, RUN. The most healthy straight relationships I’ve seen have a man who supports their wife/girlfriend’s own path especially concerning education or furthering her career or just general self development and independence. And if a specific university’s cost is too high? He’s out here researching alternatives and helping her pursue her goals regardless of how some avenues are unattainable. Stay vigilant queens and don’t ever let a man knock your crown off. 💖
femaelstrom commented on a post
“And once a woman gets hit, is she stupid because she doesn’t leave?” Literally yes what point do you think you’re making here
femaelstrom commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
I’m about to say what I believe is a deeply unpopular opinion, but bear with me until the end: I love the miscommunication trope. I know, I know. Some of you are probably gasping and clutching your pearls right now, but hear me out.
I love a good angst moment. That blue, heart-aching, lip-quivering feeling you get when reading something irreconcilably sad. But here’s the thing: I don’t actually like the consequences of it.
Let’s say we’re reading a romance novel. The couple is vibing, they have insane chemistry, we got the meet-cute, the first kisses, the whole shebang, and now we’re approaching one of my favorite parts: the third-act breakup. A staple of the genre. But we need a reason for them to break up, right?
So let’s say one of them cheats. I know. Horrific. But the angst of it all? The heartbreak of the person who got cheated on? The longing and regret of the one who did the cheating? Chef’s kiss.
Except... this is a romance novel. We need the HEA. They have to get back together. But someone CHEATED!!! I hate cheating. I genuinely cannot deal with it. I would never forgive the cheater, even if their partner does. At that point, the novel is probably ruined for me.
Now compare that to miscommunication. No one actually betrayed anyone. There’s just a misunderstanding that spirals because these two idiots refuse to communicate properly. And I know what people think: “Ugh, this is so frustrating. If they would just TALK, everything would be solved.” And that’s true. But that’s exactly why I like it.
We still get the angst, the heartbreak, the longing, the yearning... but without any irredeemable damage. None of the emotional rot that permanently changes the relationship. Everything is still fixable.
That’s what the miscommunication trope is to me: flirting with pain without actually committing to it. I get all the delicious sadness with none of the lingering devastation. Tragedy, but with guardrails. We are talking "safe angst", baby.
Does anyone else feel this way, or am I alone in this?
femaelstrom made progress on...
Post from the Pagebound Club forum
I’m about to say what I believe is a deeply unpopular opinion, but bear with me until the end: I love the miscommunication trope. I know, I know. Some of you are probably gasping and clutching your pearls right now, but hear me out.
I love a good angst moment. That blue, heart-aching, lip-quivering feeling you get when reading something irreconcilably sad. But here’s the thing: I don’t actually like the consequences of it.
Let’s say we’re reading a romance novel. The couple is vibing, they have insane chemistry, we got the meet-cute, the first kisses, the whole shebang, and now we’re approaching one of my favorite parts: the third-act breakup. A staple of the genre. But we need a reason for them to break up, right?
So let’s say one of them cheats. I know. Horrific. But the angst of it all? The heartbreak of the person who got cheated on? The longing and regret of the one who did the cheating? Chef’s kiss.
Except... this is a romance novel. We need the HEA. They have to get back together. But someone CHEATED!!! I hate cheating. I genuinely cannot deal with it. I would never forgive the cheater, even if their partner does. At that point, the novel is probably ruined for me.
Now compare that to miscommunication. No one actually betrayed anyone. There’s just a misunderstanding that spirals because these two idiots refuse to communicate properly. And I know what people think: “Ugh, this is so frustrating. If they would just TALK, everything would be solved.” And that’s true. But that’s exactly why I like it.
We still get the angst, the heartbreak, the longing, the yearning... but without any irredeemable damage. None of the emotional rot that permanently changes the relationship. Everything is still fixable.
That’s what the miscommunication trope is to me: flirting with pain without actually committing to it. I get all the delicious sadness with none of the lingering devastation. Tragedy, but with guardrails. We are talking "safe angst", baby.
Does anyone else feel this way, or am I alone in this?
femaelstrom commented on a post
Post from the Breaking Dawn (The Twilight Saga, #4) forum
femaelstrom wrote a review...
This one took a while to win me over, but once it did, it REALLY did.
I’m not gonna lie, the beginning had me nervous. I wasn’t fully sold on Logan and Grace’s dynamic at first, and I was kind of unsure about everything for a good chunk of the story. Grace took me a little while to connect to and Logan wasn’t immediately hitting for me the way Garrett did in the first book.
But as the story went on, Logan and Grace completely grew on me. By the end, I genuinely adored them both individually and together. Logan's story especially ended up surprising me emotionally. His relationship with his family hit me so much harder than I expected and genuinely brought me to tears by the end. There was something really tender and painful there that gave the story a lot more depth.
I still don’t think the overall flow was as strong as The Deal. That first book had this effortless addictive quality to it, and this one felt a little shakier structurally. Honestly, if I hadn’t already fallen in love with the world and characters through the first book, I don’t know if I would’ve connected to this one as much as I ultimately did.
But in the end? I really did love it.
I had so much fun with these characters, got emotionally attached against my will, and finished the book genuinely happy I picked it up.
femaelstrom finished a book

The Mistake (Off-Campus, #2)
Elle Kennedy
femaelstrom made progress on...
femaelstrom commented on a post
femaelstrom commented on a post
I'm not a fan of her friend Ramona. EDIT: okay, I FUCKING HATE Ramona.
Post from the The Mistake (Off-Campus, #2) forum
femaelstrom started reading...

The Mistake (Off-Campus, #2)
Elle Kennedy
femaelstrom commented on femaelstrom's update