grease-cee wrote a review...
Surprised so many of these stories focused on time travel as an upper class commodity and tool of capitalism. While an interesting idea in itself, these collections usually have more variety in their approach to the primary theme. Yet we were delivered the same ol’ tale a couple of times. And, hate to say it, but most of them were boring.
The only stories I enjoyed were “Cronus” by Djèli Clark” and “A Visit to the Husband Archive” by Kaliane Braley as they felt unique. “For a Limited Time Only,” by Peng Shepard was OK.
grease-cee is interested in reading...

Alas, Babylon
Pat Frank
grease-cee started reading...

Flesh
David Szalay
Post from the Swan Song forum
grease-cee started reading...

Swan Song
Robert McCammon
grease-cee wrote a review...
All that just for a mid TV show no one will watch. Rough..
grease-cee finished a book

Escape!
Stephen Fishbach
grease-cee started reading...

Escape!
Stephen Fishbach
grease-cee wrote a review...
I expected too much from this and that’s on me. I was looking forward to some ridiculous Nazisploitation story—akin to the movie Dead Snow—with a bit of nuance/cultural commentary. That was probably too much to expect from a book published in 1980.
Instead, we some real racist, boring, white savior story that’s giving nazi apologist? Everyone in this book was way too chill about meeting and hanging out with an actual (alive) Nazi.
I suppose you could say racist + white savior is to be expected in exploitation work...but damn did it have to be so dull?
grease-cee wrote a review...
The concept and plot of this book were great. Unfortunately, the execution left something to be desired.
The author loves to wax poetic unnecessarily. I do not need to read a full paragraph of similes and metaphors on how Phosyne feels anxious. You can just tell me one time, with perhaps one flowery sentence, that she is anxious. We get the gist.
By the end, everything was also v confusing. The arrival of the saints is linked to a myriad of things that all seem to contradict each other, yet each assertion is described with such certainty that I don’t know if the author forgot what their true source was or if we, the readers, are supposed to be skeptical of all explanations?
A lot of of unnecessary loose ends. A lot of “eh” moments. Starling could be a phenomenal author if she cut down the platitudes and chose to show, not tell. Her audience is a lot smarter than she thinks.
grease-cee finished a book

The Starving Saints
Caitlin Starling
grease-cee wrote a review...
Susan is v snobbish and annoying. I liked the Atticus story more than her POV
grease-cee finished a book

Magpie Murders (Susan Ryeland, #1)
Anthony Horowitz
Post from the Magpie Murders (Susan Ryeland, #1) forum
grease-cee commented on a post
Reading this out of order, read but wasn’t that impressed with Moonflower Murders. I preferred the written mystery rather than the part with Susan Ryeland. But trying this to see if I missed context. So far, I’m enjoying the setup. Still dreading Susan’s entry.
grease-cee commented on a post
This book looked good but so far it’s so repetive and…meh. Does it get any better or do I need to DNF?
Post from the Magpie Murders (Susan Ryeland, #1) forum
…”foreign” or “foreigners” that irritates me to no end. Why is Susan saying “foreign wine” or “foreigners” when she can just say “wine from Spain” or “man from Germany?” Even how Susan talks about her own Greek bf—pointing out that he speaks English well—seems absurd. 😂
Idk, am I just a sensitive American? Is this normal language in England? It feels so unnecessarily other.
We’re supposed to like Susan, right? So far she just seems kind of bland with a dash of Agatha Christie xenophobia
grease-cee started reading...

Magpie Murders (Susan Ryeland, #1)
Anthony Horowitz