mervin finished reading and wrote a review...
Great start, but went downhill about halfway through. The FMC was insufferably insecure. This book (the FMC) was constantly making a big deal out of nothing. The “taboo” aspect of her relationship with the MMC, not knowing how the MMC felt about her (despite him being extremely direct and obvious about it), what she should do career-wise (even though she always had the opportunity to follow her dreams with a nice supportive safety net). I liked the MMC, but the FMC ruined the book for me. This book was overly shiny and polished in terms of banter and the love interests initial meeting. It was algorithmic and predictable, especially the stupid third act break-up. The original plot point of her giving him bedroom lessons barely ever occurred, and it was pretty much abandoned halfway through the book. The dialogue got progressively more cheesy and cringey (including during the sex scenes, which is ironic considering she was teaching him how to dirty talk). There was no real conflict or drama, and the book just got progressively more boring, and I skimmed the ending. Also this book was EERILY similar to Fan Service by Rosie Danan, who I believe did a blurb for one of this author’s other books. Overall just a boring predictable copy of other similar boring romance books that aren’t really worth the read. Also this book was so AGGRESSIVELY MILLENNIAL UGHHHHHHHH!!! The humor, the banter, the references- just ughhhhh.
mervin finished reading and wrote a review...
Meh. Very average. Uninspired. This was definitely a 3 star leaning towards 2, as opposed to a 3 star leaning towards 4. Like, there may not have been anything SUPER wrong with it, but I still didn’t enjoy it THAT much.
mervin finished reading and wrote a review...
Excellent, strange little book. It’s kind of hard to feel a specific way about it. It was good, well written, simultaneously interesting and uneventful. The characters seemed very, very real- like unbelievably three dimensional, and very well established even early on. This book did a fantastic job depicting depression and self destruction. The ending wrapped up maybe a bit too fast, and maybe a bit too well, and left me wanting just a bit more, but overall, a great book.
mervin finished reading and wrote a review...
mervin commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
Things that I don’t get and I wish authors would stop
Waggling eyebrows. What even is this? This is cartoonish. People don’t do this in real life.
When the FMC nickname has “lil” in it. I think we have exhausted that one. Lil rabbit. Lil mouse. I’m over it.
Gulped. I hate this word for no reason.
Also while I don’t hate it, “good girl” does nothing for me.
Does anyone have things/phrases that make you annoyed?
mervin joined a quest
American Classic Literature 🇺🇸📚🥧
🏆 // 1021 joined
Not Joined
A collection of the most influential works in American literature.
mervin commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
Something I’ve noticed, especially since I started spending time in bookish spaces (booktok, bookstagram, etc.), is that my standards for books don’t really seem to align with most people’s. I DNF a LOT of books, and the most common reason why is that the quality of the writing isn’t good enough in my opinion. From what I’ve seen though, writing quality seems to be a fairly low priority for a lot of readers. Like, a lot of people seem to value other things more (which is fine), so much so that they’re willing to look past poor writing. For me, no matter how interesting a premise is, or how juicy a plot seems, or how likeable the characters seem like they’ll be, I can’t look past poor writing (spelling/grammar issues, repetition, inconsistencies/plot holes, etc.). I feel like people rarely ever mention writing quality in their reviews though! Even when I check the negative reviews, I feel like it’s rare for people to attribute their dislike to the writing quality. It kinda makes me feel a little crazy. Like no one else is seeing what I’m seeing, or like I’m overly critical, but at the same time, if I were truly overly critical I wouldn’t have ANY books that I like, but I do.
Anyways, I’m not sure if I properly expressed what I’m trying to say, but does anyone have any thoughts?
mervin finished reading and wrote a review...
It was taking too long to get into the meat of the story, not to mention the FMC’s inner monologue was repetitive and rambly. It felt like the author was trying too hard to be atmospheric with her writing, and some of the prose felt almost pretentious? I think the plot twist included something about the FMC not being in control, and that’s why she was behaving the way she was or something (aka making poor decisions and being blazé about her VERY SERIOUS circumstances), but even if that’s the case it was still annoying to read. I don’t want to read about a protagonist with zero self preservation and/or no control/autonomy, especially if I’m meant to believe they’re intelligent enough to be a space researcher. A profession like that requires logical thinking, and the FMC seemed to have none. I’d be willing to give this author another chance though!
mervin DNF'd a book
Thrum
Meg Smitherman
mervin commented on a post
I think I’m going to DNF. I don’t like the FMC. I’m halfway through the book and basically nothing has happened. I’m not rooting for anyone, and I’m completely disinterested. Ami and/or Dorian could DIE on the next page, and I wouldn’t care even a little.
Post from the Thrum forum
I think I’m going to DNF. I don’t like the FMC. I’m halfway through the book and basically nothing has happened. I’m not rooting for anyone, and I’m completely disinterested. Ami and/or Dorian could DIE on the next page, and I wouldn’t care even a little.
Post from the Thrum forum
Post from the Thrum forum
It feels like the book is trying reeeeally hard to be super atmospheric, but it’s not really landing for me. I just keep thinking “Okay, we get it. Space is vast. You’re alone. You’ve made your point.” 🙂
mervin started reading...
Thrum
Meg Smitherman
mervin commented on horseheaux's review of Shy Girl
i am so sorry but what did i just read. this book needed some HEAVY editing before being published. grammar mistakes all over the place. the pacing was trash. nothing was fleshed out. ALSO THE ARTWORK WAS STOLEN FROM WHYN LEWIS. i did not buy any part of this. his dog for SEVEN years? be so fucking for real. 2 stars for the plot because it had potential to be good as a short story or as a deep dive into the psychological and physical transformation but unfortunately it was neither of those so it was a big fat miss for me. just 214 pgs of what felt like a half baked idea. (w)oof. misled yet again by a beautiful cover!!
edit: did a google search and found a reddit post about this book. people think AI wrote it bc it is so bad and had awful formatting, repetitive phrasing, on top of the other reasons i also mentioned above. someone even put it into an AI text detector and it said it was highly confident it was AI generated. you cannot make this shit up (unless you're AI)
mervin commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
Something I’ve noticed, especially since I started spending time in bookish spaces (booktok, bookstagram, etc.), is that my standards for books don’t really seem to align with most people’s. I DNF a LOT of books, and the most common reason why is that the quality of the writing isn’t good enough in my opinion. From what I’ve seen though, writing quality seems to be a fairly low priority for a lot of readers. Like, a lot of people seem to value other things more (which is fine), so much so that they’re willing to look past poor writing. For me, no matter how interesting a premise is, or how juicy a plot seems, or how likeable the characters seem like they’ll be, I can’t look past poor writing (spelling/grammar issues, repetition, inconsistencies/plot holes, etc.). I feel like people rarely ever mention writing quality in their reviews though! Even when I check the negative reviews, I feel like it’s rare for people to attribute their dislike to the writing quality. It kinda makes me feel a little crazy. Like no one else is seeing what I’m seeing, or like I’m overly critical, but at the same time, if I were truly overly critical I wouldn’t have ANY books that I like, but I do.
Anyways, I’m not sure if I properly expressed what I’m trying to say, but does anyone have any thoughts?
Post from the Pagebound Club forum
Something I’ve noticed, especially since I started spending time in bookish spaces (booktok, bookstagram, etc.), is that my standards for books don’t really seem to align with most people’s. I DNF a LOT of books, and the most common reason why is that the quality of the writing isn’t good enough in my opinion. From what I’ve seen though, writing quality seems to be a fairly low priority for a lot of readers. Like, a lot of people seem to value other things more (which is fine), so much so that they’re willing to look past poor writing. For me, no matter how interesting a premise is, or how juicy a plot seems, or how likeable the characters seem like they’ll be, I can’t look past poor writing (spelling/grammar issues, repetition, inconsistencies/plot holes, etc.). I feel like people rarely ever mention writing quality in their reviews though! Even when I check the negative reviews, I feel like it’s rare for people to attribute their dislike to the writing quality. It kinda makes me feel a little crazy. Like no one else is seeing what I’m seeing, or like I’m overly critical, but at the same time, if I were truly overly critical I wouldn’t have ANY books that I like, but I do.
Anyways, I’m not sure if I properly expressed what I’m trying to say, but does anyone have any thoughts?