Post from the Narration in the Fiction Film forum
What I admire about Bordwell’s style is how there seems to never be a sentence that is irrelevant to his argument. Every single sentence is so densely packed with valuable meaning I’m pretty much highlighting everything. It’s just impressive how he manages to make every word count rather than ramble incoherently for ages before making a point, like academics so often do.
pakramsnukas TBR'd a book

The Force of Nonviolence: The Ethical in the Political
Judith Butler
pakramsnukas is interested in reading...

How to Spot a Fascist
Umberto Eco
pakramsnukas is interested in reading...

Africa Is Not a Country: Notes on a Bright Continent
Dipo Faloyin
pakramsnukas is interested in reading...

Humankind: A Hopeful History
Rutger Bregman
Post from the Narration in the Fiction Film forum
haha. I’m reading this for my thesis, in which I’m trying to prove the usefulness of theories other than psychoanalysis for analyzing desire in film. It genuinely made me giggle how well Bordwell reasons why he, likewise, does not engage with psychoanalysis in his theory of the film spectator:
“While I do not deny the usefulness of psychoanalytic approaches to the spectator, I see no reason to claim for the unconscious any activities which can be explained on other grounds.”
10/10.
pakramsnukas started reading...

Narration in the Fiction Film
David Bordwell
pakramsnukas wrote a review...
Although my rating might not seem particularly high, I think this book is worth one’s time. It’s a really strong anthology of plant horror, whose main strength is the representation of genres and writing styles that took a crack at the same trope—the murderous plant. It has it all: detectives, mad scientists, and even soldiers suffering from PTSD. I especially loved how the juxtaposition of different stories made me consider what writing style I enjoyed and why, and how the comparison of them could help me find my own voice when writing in English. I would recommend picking this or any similar anthology solely for this.
Having said that, I was expecting a little more variation in terms of narrative. Although the plot of most of the stories differed, too many of them followed the same narrative structure: 1) a tropical plant is brought from far away; 2) it is planted and abandoned by some obscure ancestor or a mad scientist takes care of it to make it the biggest, most dangerous, most exceptional specimen for no good or logical reason; 3) someone dies. Technically, I probably should not have expected anything else, but add this to some questionable characterizations and prejudices of the gothic era and you get a book that is brilliant conceptually, but not as enriching content-wise.
Nevertheless, I think it is really interesting as a representation of the gothic period, the genre of plant horror, and the genre of anthology. Pick it up, especially if you have a curious, academic mind.
pakramsnukas finished a book

Evil Roots: Killer Tales of the Botanical Gothic (Tales of the Weird)
Daisy Butcher
pakramsnukas commented on a post
Post from the Evil Roots: Killer Tales of the Botanical Gothic (Tales of the Weird) forum
pakramsnukas made progress on...
pakramsnukas is interested in reading...

Nothing Tastes as Good
Luke Dumas
pakramsnukas commented on a post
I was not expecting to read the word combination “blood-thirsty vegetable” in my life.
pakramsnukas made progress on...
pakramsnukas made progress on...
Post from the Evil Roots: Killer Tales of the Botanical Gothic (Tales of the Weird) forum
There is a passage transcribed from some kind of papers left by Mr Crome. All the nouns in it start with a capital letter. Can anyone explain why? I know that Germans capitalize their nouns; perhaps English had the same rule back in the day?