avatar

runonthebooks

241 points

0% overlap
Level 2
My Taste
The School of Night
Martyr!
The Grapes of Wrath
Aliss at the Fire
Reading...
The Heart Is a Lonely Hunter
8%
White Noise
37%

runonthebooks made progress on...

2h
White Noise

White Noise

Don DeLillo

37%
3
1
Reply

runonthebooks TBR'd a book

2d
L'anniversario

L'anniversario

Andrea Bajani

0
0
Reply

runonthebooks commented on harrowclare's update

harrowclare made progress on...

2d
Underground: The Tokyo Gas Attack and the Japanese Psyche

Underground: The Tokyo Gas Attack and the Japanese Psyche

Haruki Murakami

61%
3
1
Reply

runonthebooks commented on a post

2d
  • Martyr!
    Thoughts from 76% (page 251)

    😭😭😭

    3
    comments 1
    Reply
  • runonthebooks commented on runonthebooks's review of The Deserters

    2d
  • The Deserters
    runonthebooks
    Feb 02, 2026
    4.0
    Enjoyment: 3.5Quality: 5.0Characters: 3.0Plot: 3.0

    The Deserters feels like stepping into two separate stories that keep glancing at each other without ever fully meeting. You’re always trying to work out how they connect, and Enard makes that uncertainty part of the experience.

    The soldier’s storyline is the one that really tightened the screws for me. The way the narration slips between first and third person gives it a strange, disorienting edge. It’s not dramatic, just quietly unsettling. The dynamic between the soldier and the woman is tense enough that you feel yourself bracing. The night kept falling — that line captures the atmosphere perfectly.

    Then there’s the other narrative: the daughter of a famous mathematician and Holocaust survivor, caught in the middle of an event celebrating her father’s life. It all unfolds on 11 September 2001, which adds a heavy, unavoidable shadow to everything she observes. Her perspective gives the book a different texture — more reflective, more grounded in history and memory. It’s a completely different voice, and that contrast is deliberate.

    You keep waiting for the moment the two stories snap together, but Enard keeps that connection hazy. It’s not frustrating — more like being asked to sit with ambiguity for a while.

    A line that stuck with me: You know these things, that torture taught you.

    For me, the questions linger… how do these stories speak to each other? What’s hiding in the space between them? And why does the uneasiness stay long after the final page?

    2
    comments 2
    Reply
  • runonthebooks made progress on...

    1w
    White Noise

    White Noise

    Don DeLillo

    11%
    3
    0
    Reply

    runonthebooks made progress on...

    1w
    The Heart Is a Lonely Hunter

    The Heart Is a Lonely Hunter

    Carson McCullers

    8%
    2
    0
    Reply

    runonthebooks made progress on...

    1w
    The Heart Is a Lonely Hunter

    The Heart Is a Lonely Hunter

    Carson McCullers

    4%
    1
    0
    Reply

    runonthebooks made progress on...

    1w
    White Noise

    White Noise

    Don DeLillo

    8%
    1
    0
    Reply

    runonthebooks left a rating...

    1w
  • A Pale View of Hills
    runonthebooks
    Mar 01, 2026
    4.0
    Enjoyment: 4.0Quality: 5.0Characters: 3.0Plot: 3.0
    1
    comments 0
    Reply
  • runonthebooks made progress on...

    2w
    A Pale View of Hills

    A Pale View of Hills

    Kazuo Ishiguro

    56%
    1
    0
    Reply

    runonthebooks commented on marcodipp's update

    marcodipp made progress on...

    2w
    Satantango

    Satantango

    László Krasznahorkai

    30%
    2
    3
    Reply

    runonthebooks commented on runonthebooks's review of Small Rain

    2w
  • Small Rain
    runonthebooks
    Feb 24, 2026
    4.5
    Enjoyment: 4.0Quality: 4.0Characters: 5.0Plot: 3.5
    ❤️
    🤕
    💦
    1
    comments 3
    Reply
  • runonthebooks TBR'd a book

    2w
    Open, Heaven

    Open, Heaven

    Seán Hewitt

    0
    0
    Reply