3.73 average · 376 reviews
Click a segment to filter


Does an observer inexorably change what they are observing?
Do we colonize the world, or does it colonize us?
Does the existence of a multitude of living things in the world prove its banality, or is that the exact reason to be filled with wonder at it?
This book is filled with ambiguity and is strangely clear. The protagonist is plainly logical and rational, yet she is fully mad.
I still have so many questions even now that this book is over! The thrill was unending and I couldn’t put the book down! I don’t know what else to say except that if you enjoy thrillers/psychological horror, you need to experience this one for yourself!


Whimsical, weird, so SO funny, and an absolute “fuck you” to social expectations of women and the elderly! I don’t know that I can accurately describe how truly delightful this book is!
Marian, the 92 year old, toothless MC, is eccentric at the start, to say the least, but as the story goes on, things continue to devolve beyond anything rational. This is a truly mad story! I never had any idea where the plot was going next, and I was always enraptured and charmed by the surreal, absurd, WILD adventure Marian went on.
No review will do this book justice, so please do yourself a favor and go read it!
PS: As others have said, this was published in the 1970s, so there are some outdated, offensive terms.
PPS: The audiobook was narrated by actress Sian Phillips and she was absolute perfection!


Love Galaxy
Sierra Branham
I’m curious about people’s opinions of Spie and her role in the story as they relates to straight romance. I feel like in a lot of straight romance, a lot of times the man/love interest is a player, cocky, and talks down to the FMC. Spie is very much filling that role here.
The few queer romances that I’ve read didn’t feel like that. At this point in the story, this feels like it’s a patriarchal romance wrapped up in sapphic wrapping.
I am straight, but I like my men gentle, sensitive, artsy, and most straight romances don’t have that, so I’m never very interested in the male lead. I would assume queer romance would have less of the “asshole romantic interest” problem, but this book is not proving that hypothesis correct 😂
Anyway, I appreciate anyone’s thoughts on this!
I feel like every reader I talk to has a different definition of “cozy”! 😂 I think about the discussion of The Spellshop and how some people got stressed out because the stakes went up… or how since it included political and societal collapse it’s NOT cozy at all. I’ve even heard it to describe books like The Adventures of Amina al-Sirafi and others I would NOT define as cozy at all.
I wonder if some people mean “whimsical,” or others mean “low-stakes,” and still others mean “fun.”
At this point I’m not sure how I would define “cozy” 😂 Help me out here! What is “cozy?”