avatar

anaconda

opinionated yapper with a tbr too long for one lifetime ✶ professional list maker 21 ✶ german cultural anthropology & english student

1164 points

0% overlap
Level 4
Winter 2026 Readalong
My Taste
Psycho Devils (Cruel Shifterverse, #5)
Us Dark Few (Us Dark Few #1)
Blood Oath (Cursed Legacies #1)
The Gladiator's Downfall (Age of the Andinna, #1)
Seatmate (Love Lines, #3)
Reading...
Project Hail Mary
0%
Whispers of the Deep (Deep Waters, #1)
46%

anaconda wrote a review...

1h
  • Work Clothes (Chic Simple): Casual Dress for Serious Work
    anaconda
    Feb 03, 2026
    4.0
    Enjoyment: 4.5Quality: 4.5Characters: Plot:
    📠
    🧣
    📞

    An interesting commentary on office fashion in the 90s and how to dress appropriately at the time.

    There is a very fascinating element to this that I am sure Gross did not intend to be there, in which we get a direct comparison of expectations for men and women. Such as men being told not to buy certain fabrics as they cannot just be tossed in the wash, while a the women get a list of skirt lengths, and levels of tightness and how to wear their hair and make up.

    The writing is quite charming at times and I love the overall visual experience of reading the book. Very interesting and nicely formatted.

    1
    comments 0
    Reply
  • Work Clothes (Chic Simple): Casual Dress for Serious Work
    anaconda
    Edited
    Books with creative layout and designs on page are so much more fun

    I miss when books just looked fun. The entire design of this book's interior is so fun and engaging and interesting without distracting from the contents beind conveyed; When did everything become so monotone and bleak?

    1
    comments 0
    Reply
  • anaconda finished a book

    10h
    The Serviceberry: Abundance and Reciprocity in the Natural World

    The Serviceberry: Abundance and Reciprocity in the Natural World

    Robin Wall Kimmerer

    1
    0
    Reply

    anaconda commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum

    1d
  • anaconda
    Edited
    I‘m not a huge fan of downvoting unpopular opinions in forums

    (Of course this is not about needless hating, rude posts, racism, any kind of bigotry.)

    But especially in forums of nonfiction books I have often seen that some people‘s thoughts get downvoted into the negative space because they disagree with the author or question them, or maybe just need some clarification.

    I feel like this leads to an echochamber-like space. Art is supposed to be discussed, not blindly praised. Art is rarely born from pure positivity, it is often motivated by pain or anger, and I don‘t think expecting every person to agree with every viewpoint is a productive frame for discussing books.

    The example which prompted this post was the forum of a nonfiction book, where a disabled reader gave some insight into how their perspective as a disabled person differs from that of the able-bodied author and why. The post was not written accusatorily or angrily, and still the reader‘s comments were downvoted. Something about that doesn‘t feel right to me.

    I feel like in a space in which we discuss books, we should engage in discourse and of course disagree at times, but do so without disregarding valid opinions that may just not align with what the majority thinks.

    At the same time, I guess downvoting mainly shows disagreement, it‘s not like being downvoted means a post is deleted eventually, which would be an entirely different thing. I just considered downvoting to be something you do when someone posts “irrelevant“ (like just geeking out or little personal notes that don’t contribute anything for others) or hateful posts, but maybe I‘m in the minority there.

    I don‘t know, I haven‘t thought about this too much in detail yet and was interested in what some other people think!

    99
    comments 75
    Reply
  • Post from the Pagebound Club forum

    1d
  • anaconda
    Edited
    I‘m not a huge fan of downvoting unpopular opinions in forums

    (Of course this is not about needless hating, rude posts, racism, any kind of bigotry.)

    But especially in forums of nonfiction books I have often seen that some people‘s thoughts get downvoted into the negative space because they disagree with the author or question them, or maybe just need some clarification.

    I feel like this leads to an echochamber-like space. Art is supposed to be discussed, not blindly praised. Art is rarely born from pure positivity, it is often motivated by pain or anger, and I don‘t think expecting every person to agree with every viewpoint is a productive frame for discussing books.

    The example which prompted this post was the forum of a nonfiction book, where a disabled reader gave some insight into how their perspective as a disabled person differs from that of the able-bodied author and why. The post was not written accusatorily or angrily, and still the reader‘s comments were downvoted. Something about that doesn‘t feel right to me.

    I feel like in a space in which we discuss books, we should engage in discourse and of course disagree at times, but do so without disregarding valid opinions that may just not align with what the majority thinks.

    At the same time, I guess downvoting mainly shows disagreement, it‘s not like being downvoted means a post is deleted eventually, which would be an entirely different thing. I just considered downvoting to be something you do when someone posts “irrelevant“ (like just geeking out or little personal notes that don’t contribute anything for others) or hateful posts, but maybe I‘m in the minority there.

    I don‘t know, I haven‘t thought about this too much in detail yet and was interested in what some other people think!

    99
    comments 75
    Reply
  • anaconda commented on a post

    1d
  • The Serviceberry: Abundance and Reciprocity in the Natural World
    Thoughts from 20%

    The thoughts and ideas on this book is beautiful. But I feel dumb reading it most of the time with all the theories and words that goes over my head and it makes me space out.

    14
    comments 8
    Reply
  • anaconda is interested in reading...

    1d
    Dungeon Crawler Carl (Dungeon Crawler Carl, #1)

    Dungeon Crawler Carl (Dungeon Crawler Carl, #1)

    Matt Dinniman

    1
    0
    Reply

    anaconda started reading...

    1d
    The Serviceberry: Abundance and Reciprocity in the Natural World

    The Serviceberry: Abundance and Reciprocity in the Natural World

    Robin Wall Kimmerer

    4
    0
    Reply

    anaconda commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum

    1d
  • Trigger Warning List

    Does anybody have any good recommendations for trigger warning databases for books?

    I’ve tried book trigger warnings and Does the Dog Die but a lot of books are missing from both 😕

    I love horror but I hate reading about bugs 😖 so I like to know a head of time if there’s any graphic descriptions

    24
    comments 23
    Reply
  • anaconda commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum

    1d
  • Fun Question, what's your favorite fictional character name?

    It doesnt even have to be your favorite character, just one you find their names cool and unique. Mine might be Finnick Odair?

    25
    comments 53
    Reply
  • anaconda commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum

    1d
  • Fun Question: Do you care more about strong character development or a gripping plot?

    For me, character development plays a big role in the story's progress, always. I’ll follow emotionally complex characters even through a slower plot. But having a bit of both is so important overall for the book, otherwise the whole book will be so plain and bland. SO I GUESS BIT OF BOTH

    33
    comments 62
    Reply
  • Whispers of the Deep (Deep Waters, #1)
    Thoughts from 51%
    spoilers

    View spoiler

    5
    comments 0
    Reply
  • anaconda made progress on...

    2d
    Whispers of the Deep (Deep Waters, #1)

    Whispers of the Deep (Deep Waters, #1)

    Emma Hamm

    46%
    1
    0
    Reply