ashtonavocado joined a quest
The Monstrous Feminine đ«đȘđȘ
đ // 520 joined
Not Joined



Embracing the body and reclaiming otherness, these books use horror to redefine notions of womanhood and monstrosity.
ashtonavocado joined a quest
Fever Dreams & Strange Realities đđđ”
đ // 482 joined
Not Joined



Reality is overrated! These surreal and absurd fiction books remove logic to reveal their truths. Here the impossible is inevitable, the strange is necessary, and Kafkaesque is only the beginning.
Post from the All the Light We Cannot See forum
ashtonavocado created a list
am i being lied to?
some narrators more reliable than others
created with community suggestions
0






ashtonavocado commented on a post
ashtonavocado commented on a post
ashtonavocado commented on a post
ashtonavocado made progress on...
ashtonavocado is interested in reading...

Wieland and Memoirs of Carwin the Biloquist (Penguin Classics)
Charles Brockden Brown
ashtonavocado commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
hello everyone! i have a request that may be difficult to answer without spoiling the kind of book i'm looking for. i'm on a hunt for unreliable narrators where it's not immediately apparent the narrator is unreliable. when i think of an unreliable narrator, my mind goes toward someone who's an outcast, not really liked by the other characters or the reader, someone who's kind of weird (this is at least my experience with these characters), or maybe the book is just on the darker side. does anyone have a recommendation for a book where the main character was likable and even seemed sane for most of the book until there was a moment where it clicked like "oh, this person is actually a big fat liar"?
ashtonavocado is interested in reading...

Annihilation (Southern Reach, #1)
Jeff VanderMeer
Post from the Secret Missions: The Story of an Intelligence Officer forum
ashtonavocado commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
So I just posted the below in the fourm of the book, but I feel like I need some extra validation on this đ
Okay this is a little petty of me, but god damn I hate when authors use the same description too often. You know the whole "she let out a breath she didn't know she was holding" thing? Well, [author] has taken it a step further! On the exact same page, she has written "I thrust it open with more force than necessary..." And then. 5 lines later: " toss it open with more force than necessary..." WHYYYYYYY!? Surely! Surely! You could have found another way to say this not using the EXACT same words!!!!! Goddamn this infuriates me!
Please tell me I'm not the only one? Also, why do editors not pick up on this? Or is it something they fight authors on? The english language has so many different adjectives I just can't understand why they'd choose to repeat the same wording so close together.
Post from the Pagebound Club forum
hello everyone! i have a request that may be difficult to answer without spoiling the kind of book i'm looking for. i'm on a hunt for unreliable narrators where it's not immediately apparent the narrator is unreliable. when i think of an unreliable narrator, my mind goes toward someone who's an outcast, not really liked by the other characters or the reader, someone who's kind of weird (this is at least my experience with these characters), or maybe the book is just on the darker side. does anyone have a recommendation for a book where the main character was likable and even seemed sane for most of the book until there was a moment where it clicked like "oh, this person is actually a big fat liar"?
Post from the Secret Missions: The Story of an Intelligence Officer forum
ashtonavocado commented on ashtonavocado's update
ashtonavocado started reading...

Secret Missions: The Story of an Intelligence Officer
Estate of Ellis M. Zacharias
ashtonavocado started reading...

Secret Missions: The Story of an Intelligence Officer
Estate of Ellis M. Zacharias
ashtonavocado is interested in reading...

Table for Two
Amor Towles
ashtonavocado wrote a review...
Started with an interesting premise, then evolved into⊠not much, unfortunately. Part 1 started off well with a sort of panic about white people losing their power as they become fewer in number. Yet in Part 2, everyone who was up in arms about it seemed to become too complacent in their skin change? It didnât make sense considering there were riots in Part 1. Itâs a nice idea that people would learn to love their skin color, but for the premise of the book, doesnât feel realistic to the story.
I think Part 1 had a lot of interesting characterization through each characterâs actions as they and the others around them turned dark. It said a lot without holding the readerâs hand. All that building just unfortunately unraveled in Part 2.
As another reviewer mentioned, no other physical changes other than skin darkening were mentioned. Which is kind of a big deal. I know that if my face stayed the same but my skin color changed, Iâd probably look a little funky and out of place. The context of other features changing or not would have helped a lot.