covey entered a giveaway...
covey entered a giveaway...
covey wrote a review...
I loved how heartwarming this was, and I think it’s a good representation of how the quality of a story relies on the author, not the page count.
covey commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
Contrary to the post title, I would like to know who among us Pagebound readers have perfect eyesight. Consider this a survey. Who among us have won the lottery and have not eroded their vision with our passion for words, so gripping that we read on our backs in bed or in the dimness as evening falls?
I’d also like to hear from friends who have usual sight- or spectacle-related stories. I, for example, have near-sightedness but it’s SPECIAL. You see, one side is 3.25 and the other is… 8.75. This means one side of my glasses is thicc af and the other is okay. Some people do apparently notice this and comment on or ask about it.
Edit: Current observations - Most readers do have poor eyesight and those who don't have other issues or sight-/eye-related problems that nevertheless are disruptive despite having clear vision. It's not looking good for us.
Post from the Pagebound Club forum

covey started reading...

The Adventures of Tom Sawyer
Mark Twain
covey started reading...

The Frozen River
Ariel Lawhon
covey finished a book

A Marriage at Sea: A True Story of Love, Obsession, and Shipwreck
Sophie Elmhirst
covey commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
There’s a lot of discourse already on fanfic being published, but I’d like to focus on craft. I do believe that some fanfics are novel-worthy but I’m not sure if that means I’ll accept an adapted fanfic as a novel.
I recently finished a book and realised it started as a fanfic. As well-written and researched as it is, my first thought was, “Oh, that explains.” Which I find might be unfair because prior to finding out, I wasn’t judging it as much, but suddenly knowing that fact, the metrics changed. I value fanfics a lot and I do not think of them as lesser than published works, but I really can’t deny that my perception and opinions are changed once I discover fanfic roots. And I really don’t quite understand why.
And this also has me wondering about the way stories are structured. By all means, the rules for fanfic- and novel-writing are the same regardless of medium. Perhaps some rules or considerations are ignored in fanfic because the focus is different, but this can happen with novels as well. However, when manuscripts are put through the editing process, these considerations get brought up again to be discussed and maybe the manuscript gets changed. So why does published fanfic still feel at times like fanfic? With Red, White and Royal Blue (which iinm isn’t published fanfic but Casey McQuiston started as a fanfic writer? please lmk), I found the story very indulgent and somewhat removed from reality. Which is fine! But definitely something I’d expect more from a fanfic than a published novel.
At the same time, I also do wonder if my perceptions are coloured by what I read. There are a lot of “less serious” books out there that I generally don’t go for. Could it be that? But let’s be very real, a lot of books are wish fulfilment, fantasy power trips or what have you. What makes published fanfic different that I judge them differently?
Apologies for the directionless ruminations but I’d love to hear your thoughts! Especially for published fanfic that definitely do stand alone and aren’t just that bit confusing when divorced from the source material. Oh and happy Sunday!
covey started reading...

A Marriage at Sea: A True Story of Love, Obsession, and Shipwreck
Sophie Elmhirst
covey started reading...

What Moves the Dead (Sworn Soldier, #1)
T. Kingfisher
covey wrote a review...
🎧 Audiobook by Bookouture, narrated by Lauryn Allman.
It was a pretty good thriller. I did find myself disappointed at certain parts because of how highly recommended this book was, but it made for good background noise.
I did have one comment to make on this book, but it applies to other books as well; why do the unspoken rules of a thriller dictate that a young female main character must be given a minimum of two attractive male side characters, to which she must romantically pursue both at some stage of the story, lest she be seen as lesser by the narrative? I have questions about whether this is simply an example of an overused trope in thrillers, or if this is the impact of readers and the patterns of what sells best. I appreciate that in this book, both male characters have a somewhat specific reason for their attractiveness that influences the storyline and their decisions, but I will not spoil that, and I’d love to hear others’ thoughts on this trope.
covey finished a book

The Housemaid (The Housemaid, #1)
Freida McFadden
covey started reading...

The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
Mark Twain
covey is interested in reading...

My Husband's Wife
Alice Feeney
covey is interested in reading...

Project Hail Mary
Andy Weir
covey started reading...

The Housemaid (The Housemaid, #1)
Freida McFadden
covey commented on a post
covey wrote a review...
Waiter, there were chunks of unacknowledged narrative misogyny in my soup, and my tastebuds were overwhelmed by the sheer amount of unused potential. If I may, I would strongly suggest that the characters be measured before publishing the book, preferably using a tablespoon at minimum to add the depth that it was visibly lacking, so as to not fuel my wishes to return the book to the kitchen any more than I already want to.
I digress; I just wanted to vent my disappointment in baking terms, although I did find it to be a massive letdown compared to the first book.

covey finished a book

Family Drama
Rebecca Fallon