avatar

gardenhead

🌱 England 🌞 Millennial 🐛 Mother to a little bookworm 📚 Completely beholden to libraries 🕊️ Currently prioritising poetry, classics & anything with a good sense of humour

2241 points

0% overlap
Gothic Literature
British & Irish Classic Literature
Intro to Poetry
My Taste
Ficciones
Ulysses
Mason & Dixon
The Name of the Rose
Autobiography of Red: A Novel in Verse
Reading...
Auguries of a Minor God
0%
They Can't Kill Us Until They Kill Us
0%
You Better Be Lightning
0%
A Master of Djinn (Dead Djinn Universe, #1)
0%
Pale Fire
31%
The Thirst for Annihilation: Georges Bataille and Virulent Nihilism (An Essay in Atheistic Religion)
32%
The Problem of the Puer Aeternus (Studies in Jungian Psychology by Jungian Analysts, 87)
55%

gardenhead commented on a post

1d
  • Jane Eyre
    Thoughts from 21%
    spoilers

    View spoiler

    8
    comments 5
    Reply
  • gardenhead commented on a post

    1d
  • You Better Be Lightning
    The Night Shift (46%)

    This poem makes me feel queasy and uncomfortable. I'm not entirely sure if that was the intention. What do you think?

    Discussion questions

    1. Was this poem hard for you to read? Why or why not?
    2. What do you interpret this poem to be about, beyond a description of the job?
    3. Do you prefer Gibson's more story-like poems (like this one) or the ones that have a more clear-cut, consistent stanza scheme?
    8
    comments 6
    Reply
  • gardenhead finished a book

    2d
    The Big Four (Hercule Poirot, #5)

    The Big Four (Hercule Poirot, #5)

    Agatha Christie

    1
    0
    Reply

    gardenhead commented on a post

    3d
  • You Better Be Lightning
    Instead of Depression (35%)

    Another shorty! Gibson is so thoughtful in the placement of their poems within this collection; I feel like this skill is fading with a lot of newer writers.

    Potential discussion questions

    1. How does this poem connect to the one previous? Would the impact be different if it was placed further along in the collection?
    2. Why do you think Gibson wrote this as one long stanza instead of multiple short ones?
    13
    comments 5
    Reply
  • gardenhead commented on a post

    3d
  • You Better Be Lightning
    Loyaute
    Edited
    Every Time I Ever Said I Want to Die (32%)

    This is the most meaningful poem in the collection, to me. I have some strong personal memories connected to it. I cannot type much without getting emotional about it, so straight into the discussion questions we go:

    1. Why are specific stanzas indented? What topics do they discuss that differ from the rest of the poem? What do you think of this structure?
    2. How does Gibson's framing of death as infinity, as opposed to death as the ultimate end, change the tone of this poem?
    3. What does it mean to be a "grief astronomer"?
    13
    comments 11
    Reply
  • gardenhead commented on a post

    3d
  • You Better Be Lightning
    To Whom it Definitely Concerns, (31%)

    The satire in this poem is off the charts---it's fantastic. I always enjoy reading this one after the heavier pieces that come before it. I think it's great how Gibson can write about a serious subject in such a fun and lighthearted way. I always love reading "I will [...] sit naked on the photocopy machine so there are one hundred copies of my ass to kiss when I'm gone."

    Potential discussion questions:

    1. What do you think of the shift in tone with this poem? Do you appreciate it? Do you find it too different from the other poems read so far?
    2. How did you interpret, in stanza 2, the addition of other people beside the narrator ("the young people")? (This brought me back to the queer youth poem and made me think about the motivation to better yourself that comes with realizing younger people look up to you.)
    3. Why do you think the signature line is blank?
    14
    comments 8
    Reply
  • gardenhead commented on a post

    3d
  • You Better Be Lightning
    No Such Thing as the Innocent Bystander (30%)

    Well, in case you didn't notice, this piece is much shorter than the prior pieces! gif I personally really like when poets break up their collections like this. I think it is a useful tool to drive points/themes home.

    Potential discussion questions:

    1. Why do you think Gibson chose to keep this poem at 2 lines? What would be the advantages or disadvantages of making it a similar length to the beginning poems?
    2. How does the title influence your interpretation of the poem? Would you interpret it differently if there was no title?
    3. Gibson notoriously highlights resilience and survival in their poems; what purpose does this poem serve to those themes? (This ties in to question 1, I think.)
    14
    comments 10
    Reply