Anglerfish commented on Anglerfish's update
Anglerfish DNF'd a book
The Raven Scholar (The Eternal Path, #1)
Antonia Hodgson
Anglerfish DNF'd a book
The Raven Scholar (The Eternal Path, #1)
Antonia Hodgson
Anglerfish commented on a post
kind of annoyed with how the author writes Rin's need for approval... daddy issues much?
Anglerfish finished reading and wrote a review...
These books might not be for everyone but they're DEFINETLY for me. I love u miss gabaldon and your odes to the ART of historical fiction and prose. I love you realistic battle scenes i love you medically accurate surgery i love you profound human connection and period perfect dialogue and stylish physical comedy and witty wit wit. Claire Fraser is now 61 years old and still kicking ass. She's sewing fingers back on, she's balls deep on the battle field, she's tackling highway men and spying for the revolution and graverobbing and jumping between pirate ships and brandishing pistols. I love being in her head. I love how empathetic and smart and pragmatic and hardcore she is. Every time the narrative jumps to some hot young person I get upset. Give me back granny rn.
Anglerfish commented on a post
Anglerfish commented on a post
Anglerfish commented on a post
Finding this to be a bit of a slow start. Does this pick up a bit?
Post from the The Incandescent forum
What in the abbot elementary There are some interesting ideas here and a well thought out magic system but god it gets SO bogged down by trivial administrative minutia. I stopped, looked it up, and indeed, the author is a teacher. There’s only so much lesson plan org chart class observing appointment schedule homework marking that a book billing itself as dark academia can interject without coming off as /regular/ academia. Here’s an extract from where our main character observes a classroom: Walden opened up the observation form on her laptop and made a note: good behavior even before their teacher arrived. A nice set, as Ezekiel had said. Lesson observations could be very dull. What was wanted at the end was a beautiful A4 page of admiring notes that Walden and Ezekiel could both put in their prof dev folders ahead of the next pay review cycle. After all, there were very few surprises involved in good teaching. Different people had different styles, but the fundamentals were consistent across age groups, across disciplines, across all different kinds of schools: know your students, and Know your subject. All you could really get from an observation was a handful of ideas for things to incorporate into your own practice: activities, structures, turns of phrase… This goes on forever, intercutting the meat of the scene (of which there is…little) with didactic, vaguely relevant information. Most of the time, it adds nothing to the worldbuilding, character or plot. Just before this, there’s a tangent about how Covid affected students. Will this be relevant later? Probably not. The author just had to say her piece about it—which would be fine if it didn’t detract so jarringly from the greater story. Anytime the book even threatens to get atmospheric and creepy and beautiful, Tesh rams in six Fun Teaching Factoids to bring it crashing back to the dour reality of an elementary break room.
Anglerfish started reading...
The Incandescent
Emily Tesh
Anglerfish commented on a post
Anglerfish finished reading and wrote a review...
she ate (literally) (demons) ista <3 ista <3 ista <3 ughhhhhhhhhh it hurts knowing i will never write something this good. every line of dialogue is so profound and sharp and fun. Bujold does Presence and Gravitas so good. THIS isn't a romance book, the romance is very minor, but god damn r these characters sexy as shit. BOTH of those goddamn brothers made me want to bite my fingers off AAAAAAAAAA. It's also what makes Ista's encounter's with Divinity so powerful--because Bujold knows how to /convey/ that power. Bujold's settings are not novel. They are the standard fantasy stock of European-ish inspired medieval fantasy. But she understands the period so well--the etiquette, the architecture, the clothing, the military strategy, the POSTAL SYSTEM, that it FEELS fresh and grounded and exciting. This is the attention to detail that feels so sorely lacking in current popular offerings--but I don't want to be one of those nostalgia-clouded booers ('back in my day' no!!) Time is the greatest filter of quality. I'm sure 2003 had its share of crappy fantasy, just as 2025 will have its share of phenomenal work; the trouble is in finding it.
Anglerfish commented on a post
I’ve been trying to get through the first 3 chapters for over a month now. Why is it so painful to read 🥲
Anglerfish commented on Anglerfish's update
Anglerfish finished a book
The Knight and the Moth (The Stonewater Kingdom, #1)
Rachel Gillig
Anglerfish wrote a review...
An abysmal failure at the structural level. Gillig doesn't know what she wants to say, nor does she understand the system she's trying to critique/explore here. All the structures set up (feudal system, local economies, knighthood, priesthood, monarchy) are badly painted set-pieces made for the aesthetic and not engaged with. This felt like a video game (in a bad way). There is no meaningful attempt to connect with the lore of the world being built because the focus is instead on ferrying your characters around to caves/buildings/old forests for boss battles and the occasional road skirmish with Fantasy Beasting #37. Groping around blindly in the dark leads all our characters to major revelations. While fantasy can stretch reality, Gillig doesn't even try to consider the logistics of her world. Her world is one where there are only six hamlets, and in each one, every person works the same profession (except when plot-inconvenient). Her world is one where the 'evil gods'--the beings that the Plot centers on destroying--are just dudes who own an object that lets them apparate 20 paces to the right. They just sit in their little holes and get a paycheck from ONE business. It's not an evil syndicate brainwashing the masses--it's one lady and her six stooges working off tips in a stone divination booth. Her world is one where wagons/horses are basically cars and every hamlet is like, a 20 minute drive from the other (despite having dramatically different biomes). DON'T get me started on the dialogue, which oscillates between 'kids in a frat' and Sir Gawain and the Green Knight depending on Gillig's vibe that day. Problems are often solved by: -our priestess main character, who is as strong as knights/gods/giant monsters because she occasionally used to maintain a church wall with a chisel, punches the problem in the face. ok. -a side character just...flying over it. He has wings and is ok with ferrying other characters over obstacles. wow. It's a very stark drop in quality from Gillig's previous duology--so wtf happened? Deadlines? The acknowledgements at the end feel more like an apology than a thank you note, so I'm convinced that Gillig KNOWS it's bad, but sent it out anyway.
Anglerfish finished a book
The Knight and the Moth (The Stonewater Kingdom, #1)
Rachel Gillig
Post from the The Knight and the Moth (The Stonewater Kingdom, #1) forum
-this is still not good but im too far in to Dnf -i will not comment on the smut because i simply do not care. Our romantic leads have them chemistry of wet paper towels. How long have they even known each other? 2 weeks? Ok pledge ur eternal devotion I guess -there are exactly 6 hamlets (hamlets, not even villages) in this kingdom. It is minuscule. How the FUCK does each hamlet have a different biome. This is basically a video game map, with boss battles at each hamlet. -the comic relief character turning to us and spouting a paragraph of live laugh love wisdom out of blue? What. Did gillig write this with a shroud on.
Post from the The Knight and the Moth (The Stonewater Kingdom, #1) forum
Post from the The Knight and the Moth (The Stonewater Kingdom, #1) forum
-messy messy -is this entire country just three streets wide. so much of plot is people conveniently bumping into each other. -every hamlet is dedicated to ONE profession? this economy is in shambles. -Something about that recent Battle Scene was kind of giving boss fight. The Boss having one (1) signature move (Throw Ink Attack)? ok lol. Also you're telling me he was just there in a ivy-shrouded building. Waiting for someone to challenge him. Girl. That's a pokemon. -HORSES ARE NOT CARS BTW? You don't just park it in an alley after travelling all night (with two people riding the whole time no less!). -Our girlboss main character has eaten basically nothing but is somehow not just coherent but actively attacking grown men, saving darling children from ne'er do wells, and lowkey ignoring the entire upheaval of her belief system.
Post from the The Knight and the Moth (The Stonewater Kingdom, #1) forum
I...don't like this lol. Both main characters are acting in a way I can only describe as fourth-wing-esque (weirdly unreasonable? cliched, rather immature dialogue with the goal of manufacturing tension instead of revealing character). There's a jarring dissonance between the atmosphere and the character dialogue/action, and some of the descriptive scenes are so...clunky, for lack of a better word. Chapter 6, for example, opens like this: Coulson Faire was brilliant. A span of merchant tents in a vast field. On the far side of the field was the great castle that could be none other than Castle Luricht. The king’s castle. okay girl...give us nothing. I think reading this at the same time as Bujold's Chalion series + Kinsale's For My Lady's Heart ( all of a similar-ish historical bent, castles, kings, knights, chivalry, etc) is making me uncharitable. You can see (if you squint) that Gillig did some research, but it feels very silly and surface-level compared to Kinsale, whose work is almost incomprehensibly alien in its use of Middle English, and Bujold, who is so meticulous in her craft that you can tell, from the dialogue alone, whether a handmaiden is speaking or her lady. In Gillig's world, kings, knights and clerics use the same vocabulary and grammatical structure as peasants and farmers. Swapping 'bitches' with 'shrews' (and 'asshole' for 'knave') does not Ye Olde English make. It does, however, make me want 2 vomit.