I listened to this as an audiobook and I'm so annoyed that I can't write out my full theory with quotes to back up my theory, so I bought a copy of the ebook for an insta re-read. Tldr of the theory in case this hyperfocus leaves me and I never actually go back for the quotes.
Literally everything in this story is made up to help the author (not technically Mona Awad but stems from some of her own thoughts obviously) process the big things in life: authenticity vs performance, art vs. safety, identity vs. belonging, etc.
Every event did not really happen, they are her symbolically processing what is really happening in her life. The "beings" are called hybrids because their creation came from a shred of truth but she turned them into a hybrid with her own fantastical processing.
Every named character outside of Samantha (although this whole thing is her exploring her identity hence no one knowing her name and her and Ava doing the tango every Friday) do not exist. They might be based on a person/group, but they are aspects of society/the world that she is navigating. That's also why names are so flippantly used in this story, it's like an author trying to figure out what name best suits the character they created and the role they are designed to play in the story. Related Example: Ava calling the group of women bonobos consistently when Sam says they are bunnies and they literally call each other bunny. A group of bonobos has a very different symbolic meaning than a group of bunnies for the story, but Sam is trying to figure out what kind of society these women represent in her struggle to join them or not.
I'm a huuuuuge fan of symbolism (particularly animal symbolism) in stories and I feel like Mona Awad was subtle enough, but as someone who reads a lot about symbolism her choices were 'obvious' - I think the cleanest example is the Lion - an entity she made up who is brave enough to believe in her authentic talent. He goes away when she starts to succumb (or wants to succumb) to the bunnies that represent "shallow" art/artistry, but she doesn't understand why he is gone.
bookitbabe commented...
21w
Agreed, it seems like they’re simultaneously put off and intrigued by Samantha’s darkness. I think they know that that edginess is what’s missing from the “darlings” they’re creating, since they’re all so blatantly unimaginative/derivative.