
Book dragon: I will hoard as many as I can📚 I read a lot of genres, special love for historical fantasy though 💖 Reading is political
4183 points


4.31 average · 71 reviews
Click a segment to filter
When a work of fiction allies time theory, a bit of physic's sociological value, political commentaty, ethics, philosophy and projection beyond what our society is able to imagine, you know you just read a masterpiece. I feel like I've grown more into myself after reading The Dispossessed. I already considered myself an anarchist before so it wasn't a too murky territory, and I was very curious of how this political current might work in science-fiction, but I did not expect to have it literally blow my mind and further my expectations by a thousand. When I think about it, sci-fi is one of, if not the best, medium to access something we lack horrifically as anti-capitalists as a whole, no matter the movement, and that's projection. Because the main line of argument of opposition would be "okay, what comes next?" It's okay to say "I don't know", because it would be true. But Le Guin went further - literally, like outside our solar system - than any theories you might read and really dived deep, drilled through and exposed particles and peculiarities of a world we would never dare to imagine in the world we are in. And that's beautiful in ways that are hard to express. There is so much to say about all the topics brought up in barely 300 pages, all very important in their own right : how time, as abstract a concept as it might seem, shapes our world and how we live in it more than we can ever realize (and that's why time theories thought by people that are not white, western colonisers are very important to discuss); how community and individuality works; how one must get comfortable with change to be free, truly free... I don't want to put it all here, mainly because I know everyone can see a bit of themselves inside this book, and discovery is also important, to not always take another's word as true. But goodness that's barely scratching the surface, so imagine the rest ! I'm falling in love with this author's writing more and more as I go, I'm looking forward to reading a lot more and to keep getting surprised, and also challenged, incited to ask questions, to think deeply. Easily breaking into my top books this year.
"If you evade suffering you also evade the chance of joy. Pleasure you may get, or pleasures, but you will never be fulfilled. You will not know what it is to comes home."

The Adventures of Amina al-Sirafi (Amina al-Sirafi, #1)
Shannon Chakraborty
I seriously need more people on this book, or reading Shannon Chakraborty altogether because this specific one got me back into reading, I have a special bond to it x) but I also completely fell in love with the Daevabad universe... anyways, THIS IS NOT TALKED ABOUT ENOUGH. I never knew I needed this, but a main cast of grumpy middle aged/old and retired pirates bickering on a ship to pursue a quest they did not want to follow in the first place ? Loved it. Want more. The mere fact that Amina is 40ish, has a daughter and a bad knee makes her one of my favorite fantasy main characters of all the books I've read, and I wonder if anyone feels the same =)

The Odyssey
Homer
post has been deleted.
iamlll commented...
I think it's because the Odyssey is now a sanitized story about a guy who can't get home to his wife and son, who is so desperate but not so much as to stray from a morally righteous path and not indulge in his desires or ego. We all agree that a retelling has to have some flavor, but Nolan just took all the essence of the Odyssey out of it. Odysseus is not a good man although he is a hero in the ancient greek standard, and the constant dichotomy between the atrocities he and the greeks have done and how we still root for them to thrive is part, if a small part, of the story. Women were not treated well at this point in history, nor are they treated well later, and to remove that just paints a picture that never existed and hides the struggles and violences women faced at the hands of men. The "there is no sex" comment is about the need of modern times to gloss over the ugly facets of stories we tend to look up to as references for values and morals like strength and honor, but we tend to do that without acknowledging the rest, the part we wished was never there, and unfortunately in this text women exist alongside their sexuality and relationships to men, but it's not always something to shy away from. I find it ironic that warfare violence is still fine to show on screen, and bloodshed and violence etc, but when it comes to women we desperately need to hide it "to make it better". Transforming the sexual violence these character faced into physical ones, like the scarr on Helen's face, doesn't make anything better : it hides another truth that modern society doesn't know how to handle with as much comfort as war or a show of brute force. I think Emily Wilson's comment is pretty justified