

29 ✨ She/Her ✨ Bisexual Call me Gingie or M.E. 😍 Fantasy/SciFi/Manga/Nonfiction Collector of Books & Unpopular Takes I have a dog named Hank who is my entire personality Physical TBR Count: 555 😱😭
12284 points











3.78 average · 377 reviews
Click a segment to filter
Personal Enjoyment: 6/6 Audiobook Quality: 6/6 Final Review: 5⭐️
A modern man with daddy issues and a penchant for writing pretty prose and a historical woman with mommy issues and a very sharp sword team up to fight historical revisionism and the world’s most timey-wimey dictatorship through the power of love and sheer determination.
But on a more serious note:
I LOVED this book. I thought how our author dealt with the impacts of historical revisionism on modern politics was done masterfully. I don’t want to get into the nitty gritty in this review because I think this book is best experienced somewhat blind. The buildup between our characters is nuanced and deserves an unspoiled experience.
I thought the mechanism behind how our characters meet and interact was absolutely fascinating, and I enjoyed watching the history of the story unfold as our characters gained more and more knowledge and experience between story revisions. I also thought that our villain was a relatable one. Their story is an amalgamation of horrors common to disenfranchised populations and it did a good job explaining how victims can attempt to gain agency by victimizing those closest to them. Sometimes victims become villains and understanding their motives and their reasonings doesn’t make them any less of a villain.
In summary: I had a great time (even though I typically hate romance stories), and I think this is worth checking out — even just to experience its political commentary.
Personal Enjoyment: 5/6 Writing Quality: 5.5/6 Final Rating: 4.25⭐️
Atmospheric, dense, and intellectual.
The Secret History is incredibly interesting as a novel. Most modern literature has an extreme focus on plot — to the exclusion of deep character work. They choose a single “big event” or “breakthrough” that we spend the whole story focusing on and building up to. The Secret History does something different. I’d say it’s more of a study of characterization and unreliable narration. That’s not to say that the story doesn’t have any overarching plot. It absolutely does. It just serves more as the setting for our characterization instead of as the basis for our entertainment.
Tartt asks us to sit with a man that has no true understanding of self and no true motivations, and watch as he molds himself to interact with a group of people that embody everything he has never had access to. We watch enraptured as moral bankruptcy blooms in the face of charm, isolation, entitlement, and self-preservation. We aren’t there to solve a big mystery or go on a big adventure. We are there to watch the human consequences of moral decadence in isolated elitist circles, and I’m not sure that it could have been done much better than this.
I do agree that the novel feels a bit long on occasion. There are times where the themes and daily events are a touch repetitive, but I don’t think it detracts from the story as a whole.
Overall, Tartt does a masterful job of navigating institutional isolationism, social elitism, youthful hubris, and moral decay. We spend over 500 pages with the most unapologetically repugnant characters, and somehow come out wanting more. If that isn’t a marker of an excellent novel, then I don’t know what is. This book is the foundational text of dark academia for a reason, and it deserves all the flowers it gets.
Legends & Lattes (Legends & Lattes, #1)
Travis Baldree
Cats really are the heroes we needed.


Catching Fire (The Hunger Games, #2)
Suzanne Collins
The Fellowship of the Ring (The Lord of the Rings, #1)
J.R.R. Tolkien
I appreciate how laid back the book is compared to the movies. Maybe laid back is the wrong phrase. Methodical might be a more accurate description. The stakes are high, but I don’t feel like I’m on a runaway train. Every little bit feels like a puzzle piece specifically placed to not only tie in The Hobbit, but to build the world while the adventure is ongoing. Idk, it just feels so much more purposeful than a lot of modern fantasy I’ve read recently.


since pb is anti-ai, i wanted to highlight this. i found out about it today from a bookseller friend.
in a recent interview, tokarczuk (drive your plow over the bones of the dead, the empusium, etc) stated that she used AI to help write her most recent novel. here is an article about it on lithub.
it seems to be a recent interview and therefore new information, so there isn’t too much on it yet besides some horrified reactions on insta/threads. i’m planning to look into it more when i’m home from work and update with more links as necessary!


itsybitsygingie commented...

Like what is the exact criteria for a 5 star book vs a 3 star one😭 😭? I have an idea of how much I like a book but it is simply a problem of representing it in a numerical value, it feels like I have to make a ‘’correct choice’’ so I can truly depict how much I liked it or not.
Maybe I’m just stupid idk but it keeps me up at night, same reason for why I don’t rate movies on letterboxd


itsybitsygingie commented...
The Divine Comedy
Dante Alighieri
I might be in the minority here, but I just don't see what all the fuss is about this book. The whole thing felt like Dante showing off his classical education and his political knowledge (in Italy) through name dropping. Not to mention how he seemed to practically worship Virgil, giving him honor and titles that only truly belong to Jesus. Neither did I like how he used real people: judging, condemning and punishing them according to his own judgement.
Furthermore, some of the theology (example "limbo") is just Biblically inaccurate. I know he went off of early Catholic church doctrine because of the times he was writing in, but that doesn't make it correct.
I don't know if this is such a classic because of its influence or because in the original Italian it is truly a poetic masterpiece, but having read an English translation (since I don't know Italian) I can't say that I found it a worth while read. That being said, I do still plan on continuing the Comedy.
itsybitsygingie commented...
I think it’s difficult to promote AI as being truly easier and faster because it’s only “easier” and “faster” if you are 1) okay with using stolen work and 2) willing to accept that the machine possibly lied to you and then be unwilling to fact check what it tells you. In order to verify that it didn’t lie, one would have to go and do the research they were trying to avoid.
On my first point: I can’t convince anyone on the morality of using gen AI. One either believes that stealing work is bad, or they don’t. There is no middle ground, and to use Gen AI is to steal. These models do not work without using stolen work. One cannot make Gen AI give an answer without consulting the data it has stolen. The very use of gen ai is to state that one does not care about compensating creatives. It’s an especially offensive stance to come from someone who has won a literal Nobel prize for her writing (and has probably had their work stolen to train AI models).
On the second point: if one is willing to accept lies, then what is the point of asking AI at all? Just lie. You get the same result for even less work! One doesn’t need to do any research at all if lies truly don’t matter to them. To admit that one is looking for a correct answer from Gen AI implies that accuracy does actually matter, and to make sure that Gen AI is accurate requires additional research to be done by the prompter. It ends up totaling to MORE work than if they had just done the research in the first place. It’s a pointless addition to any research process, and makes even less sense for something as quickly researched as a themed playlist.