
The Secret History
Donna Tartt


itsybitsygingie commented...
20w

The Secret History
Donna Tartt


itsybitsygingie commented...
20w

The Secret History
Donna Tartt


itsybitsygingie commented...
20w

The Secret History
Donna Tartt


itsybitsygingie commented...
20w

The Secret History
Donna Tartt


itsybitsygingie commented...
20w


The Secret History
Donna Tartt


itsybitsygingie commented...
20w

The Secret History
Donna Tartt


itsybitsygingie commented...
20w

The Secret History
Donna Tartt
Personal Enjoyment: 5/6 Writing Quality: 5.5/6 Final Rating: 4.25⭐️
Atmospheric, dense, and intellectual.
The Secret History is incredibly interesting as a novel. Most modern literature has an extreme focus on plot — to the exclusion of deep character work. They choose a single “big event” or “breakthrough” that we spend the whole story focusing on and building up to. The Secret History does something different. I’d say it’s more of a study of characterization and unreliable narration. That’s not to say that the story doesn’t have any overarching plot. It absolutely does. It just serves more as the setting for our characterization instead of as the basis for our entertainment.
Tartt asks us to sit with a man that has no true understanding of self and no true motivations, and watch as he molds himself to interact with a group of people that embody everything he has never had access to. We watch enraptured as moral bankruptcy blooms in the face of charm, isolation, entitlement, and self-preservation. We aren’t there to solve a big mystery or go on a big adventure. We are there to watch the human consequences of moral decadence in isolated elitist circles, and I’m not sure that it could have been done much better than this.
I do agree that the novel feels a bit long on occasion. There are times where the themes and daily events are a touch repetitive, but I don’t think it detracts from the story as a whole.
Overall, Tartt does a masterful job of navigating institutional isolationism, social elitism, youthful hubris, and moral decay. We spend over 500 pages with the most unapologetically repugnant characters, and somehow come out wanting more. If that isn’t a marker of an excellent novel, then I don’t know what is. This book is the foundational text of dark academia for a reason, and it deserves all the flowers it gets.


itsybitsygingie commented...
19w
It was so good! It did take me several months to get through, though. It’s dense. I can see how people who don’t enjoy character studies would really struggle with this one.
Personal Enjoyment: 5/6 Writing Quality: 5.5/6 Final Rating: 4.25⭐️
Atmospheric, dense, and intellectual.
The Secret History is incredibly interesting as a novel. Most modern literature has an extreme focus on plot — to the exclusion of deep character work. They choose a single “big event” or “breakthrough” that we spend the whole story focusing on and building up to. The Secret History does something different. I’d say it’s more of a study of characterization and unreliable narration. That’s not to say that the story doesn’t have any overarching plot. It absolutely does. It just serves more as the setting for our characterization instead of as the basis for our entertainment.
Tartt asks us to sit with a man that has no true understanding of self and no true motivations, and watch as he molds himself to interact with a group of people that embody everything he has never had access to. We watch enraptured as moral bankruptcy blooms in the face of charm, isolation, entitlement, and self-preservation. We aren’t there to solve a big mystery or go on a big adventure. We are there to watch the human consequences of moral decadence in isolated elitist circles, and I’m not sure that it could have been done much better than this.
I do agree that the novel feels a bit long on occasion. There are times where the themes and daily events are a touch repetitive, but I don’t think it detracts from the story as a whole.
Overall, Tartt does a masterful job of navigating institutional isolationism, social elitism, youthful hubris, and moral decay. We spend over 500 pages with the most unapologetically repugnant characters, and somehow come out wanting more. If that isn’t a marker of an excellent novel, then I don’t know what is. This book is the foundational text of dark academia for a reason, and it deserves all the flowers it gets.
itsybitsygingie commented...
31w
I find it hilarious that the book opens with Richard talking about how he would’ve ended up in some cult nonsense had he stayed in California because buddy… LOOK AROUND YOU. YOU’RE IN A CULT.