3.92 average Β Β·Β 58 reviews
Click a segment to filter
I believe reading should open doors, not close them.
Which, yes, sounds a little like a bumper sticker. I'm a libra sun, though, so I'm gonna bring that overly-earnest air energy into most things. I've been listening to Hadestown all morning, so bear with me if you have the capacity lol. (Orpheus was surely an air sign, right? Or do you think water?)
I've been thinking about what I actually mean when I say that. That reading should open doors. Here's what I've got:
Reading has always felt like access to me. Access to other people. Other worlds. Other ways of thinking. Other ways of surviving. When I was a kid, learning to read felt like being handed a superpower. Suddenly there were whole lives and feelings and questions I had that weren't there before. Some of them made me laugh. Some made me feel less alone. Some made me ask better questions about myself, my family, and the world around me.
As an adult, one of my first jobs was teaching kids literacy and writing. And I learned very quickly that reading doesnt feel like magic for everyone.Β
For some kids, reading is hard. Also, as I've seen time and again in this forum, for many of us adults, too. For some, it is tied to shame or frustration or expectations.... Some kids have never seen themselves in the stories handed to them. Some are dealing with systems, families, disabilities, or just very real survival pressures that make "just read more" an absurdly incomplete answer.
But I also saw this: sometimes, when you find the right story for the right kid, and you read it in the right way, something can open. Not like some dramatic movie moment. Often not a lifelong transformation. But a pause. A question. A disruption, every time a kid asks, "Can we read one more chapter?"
Books matter to me because connection matters to me. Literacy matters because access matters. Libraries matter. Representation matters. Curiosity matters. The ability to question matters. The ability to say, "I hadn't thought of it that way," matters.
I think we are living in a world that benefits from keeping people divided, distracted, suspicious, and numb. Books dont magically fix that. I don't think any one community or person can do that. But I do think stories can make us harder to isolate. They can remind us that other people are real. They can help us practice empathy without sanding down the truth. Give us language when we might not have the words yet.
That has been true for me over and over... again and again
As a neurodivergent kid, I often felt outside of things. Misunderstood. Frustrated. Like everyone else was handed a social script I somehow missed. But books made sense. Stories were a language I knew how to speak, didn't need to rely on a script that other social interactions often required. From my first little grade school book club reading Alice in Wonderland, to my college class that taught me why Mrs. Dalloway buying the flowers herself matters, to Mary Oliver, to graphic novels, to romance, to fantasy, to the weird little books that rearrange our brain chemistry on a Tuesday.
That is why book spaces matter to me.
Not because they are perfect. People are messy.. Online spaces definitely can be, too. Communities are messy because they are made of human beings, and human beings bring their whole selves with them. Their hopes, grief, defensiveness, humor, blind spots, good intentions, bad days, and all the context no one else can fully see throughs a phone screen or computer.
But I still believe in the value of spaces built around reading.
I believe in spaces where people can be earnest without being embarrassed. Critical without being cruel. Excited without being dismissed. Curious without needing to perform certainty. I believe there should be room for the person writing a gorgeous, thoughtful review that feels to me like it should be nominated for some kind of award because holy shit, that might have been the best thing I've read all year! and the person simply saying, "This book made me feel insane and I need to lie down." What am I saying? I don' tknow. I guess just that -
I believe disagreement can make a conversation bigger instead of smaller.
Feedback can exist alongside care.
People can be imperfect and still worth listening to.
I also know building something meaningful is hard. Especially now. Especially online. Especially in tech, where so much of that world seems designed to monetize attention, flatten people into data, reward outrage, and then call it innovation. I've worked in corporate spaces. I know how quickly ideals can get swallowed by growth, money, optics, and the endless chase for more.
So when people try to build something different, something for real people that tries to prioritize said people.... I notice. I care. I want that kind of dream to survive, even when it gets complicated. Maybe especially then.
I don't know what the perfect version of any reading community looks like. I don't think there is one.
But I know what I value.
I value access. Curiosity. Clear expectations. Nuance. Joy. Constructive critique. Room for people who are still learning how to enter the conversation.
Because at the end of the day, I am here because books have made me feel less alone. And talking to people about books has been a big part of tht. They have helped me understand myself, other people, and the world with a little more softness and a little more courage.
That is what I want from the bookish/reading communities around them, too.
Not perfection or constant agreement.
Just a place where we remember there is a person on the other side of each of these posts. Or updates.
I'm real. So are you.
Anyway, thatβs where I land: still a little too earnest, still probably overthinking it, still believing books can open doors.
The world is harsh, systems are cruel, we're all tired. But that's why we keep telling stories, even the sad or imperfect stories, right? That's why continuing to try can be one of the most radical forms of resistance.

lukewarmreader commented...
I took a minute before responding because I wanted to do some of my own research into the claims above. Here's where I land, and I'm sharing in case it's helpful to anyone else reading through this list.
I think lists like this can actually do real harm to the cause they're trying to serve. I understand the very human desire to feel like we're doing something, like we're taking a stand against injustice... especially in times like this when so much feels out of our control.
But there's a difference between two ideas that keep getting collapsed into one. "Israeli civilians deserve to live free from violence, and the people murdered or taken hostage on October 7 deserve care and safety" is not the same as "I support what the Israeli government and Netanyahu are doing in Gaza." Yet "Zionist" gets used for almost any association with Israel, in any capacity. And this is where it gets sticky, because naming one harm isn't the same as treating all harm as equal. Equity isn't equality. Saying Israeli civilians deserve protection doesn't put their suffering on the same scale as what Palestinians are facing in Gaza right now.
Take NIF. It's openly Zionist, and I have no interest in defending that. But it's also the largest funder of progressive civil society in Israel, including the groups documenting the occupation and defending Palestinian and Arab citizens' rights, and it doesn't require those groups to share its politics to get funded. So when you flatten NIF into "Zionist" and nothingg else, you help delegitimize one of the biggest funding lines to the very groups documenting what's happening on the ground. That cost lands on Palestinians, not on the label.
Together Rising spent years funding Palestinian aid groups like ANERA and MECA, and raised more than a million dollars for relief in Gaza. And the claim that Glennon Doyle called displaced Palestinians Hamas terrorists, I cant find any evidence for it. The statements I've seen condemn Hamas while also condemning what's happening in Gaza and raising money for Palestinians.
Then there's Alon-Lee Green, listed only as a former adviser in Israel's parliament. I haven't listened to the podcast being referenced, but from what I could find, Green comes at politics from a socialist, non-nationalist framework. He started as a labor organizer and worked with the Hadash Party, a non-Zionist Arab-Jewish coalition, before co-founding and leading Standing Together, a Jewish-Arab movement that organizes against the occupation. And I want to be clear, I'm not holding them up as flawless. Standing Together has been criticized, including by the BDS movement, for staying deliberately vague about Zionism and the Jewish-state framework to hold its coalition together, and that vagueness is fair to push on. I'm not defending it. But even that criticism tells you more than "parliament adviser" does. Someone can be doing real work and still be worth critiquing.
A lot of us live under a government whose actions we reject, and that doesn't make us the government. I'm a US citizen, and I'm vehemently opposed to this administration. If I ever needed humanitarian aid, it would be devastating to be denied it because of who holds power over me and who put them there. That's the logic these labels run on, and when we repeat them casually, online or in conversation, real people are the ones who pay for it.
So here's what actually worries me -- the people who like or share a list like this are, almost by definition, people who care. They want to stand against the harm and the violence and the injustice, and I'm sure many of them want to give money, time, or attention to the people and groups actually doing that work. But when we flatten someone into "Zionist" and move on, we don't just write off that one person. We wave people away from the groups that person may have been connected to, the ones with funding and people on the ground who need exactly that money and attention to keep going. A list like thid can pull support away from Gaza instead of toward it. Writing off an author because a list flagged them is easy and costs us nothing. And then that cost lands somewhere else, often on the people who needed that help to reach them.
Fiction by Zionist Authors
Disclaimer: I don't wish to bring hate to any authors, I deeply believe in democracy. However I think it's important for people who hold themselves accountable for their reading choices to have access to the information about authors/books they give their time and money to. These are authors who have publicly supported Israel or middle road. If you notice someone who may have changed their stance recently or supported Palestine and are here wrongfully please do correct me





