3.75 average · 200 reviews
Click a segment to filter
i was under the impression that this is a dark academia book.
it is, infact, literally everything except that.


Thank you Pan Macmillan and NetGalley to the ARC!
If i got one thing out of this book, its that I felt an incessant need to go and hug my siblings, and I should be far more grateful for them. Also that happiness is completely what you make it out to be, not what anyone else tells you.
Gifted & Talented is a story following three siblings battling with themselves over their supposed sacred gifts and alleged promised talent, after being brought back together during their father’s death. Eldest daughter Meredith is tackling a blackmail case that will total her whole career, middle child Arthur can’t decide if his love lies with his partners, his wife or his work, and youngest Eildih just wants to be seen an appreciated by someone in her family. All three of them have to deal with (you guessed it for an Olivie book), the consequences of their own actions and how to be happy when the thing they’ve built their lives around crumbles.
Unlike other Olivie Blake books where the action is often philosophical, open ended, and leaves you numb at the thought of your existence, Gifted & Talented is an open and closed case. All the pieces are there, all the journeys are complete, all the morals have been learnt and there isn’t anything for you to do except reread and see how all these characters changed and got to where they are. I found it extremely clear what the overarching plot is (all siblings have their own storylines, but they’re all tied together by Thayer Wren’s company), and extremely satisfying to see how all the siblings play a part. All the pieces of the puzzle came together slowly- front it starting out as you needing to pick a side, and a sibling to defend but really none of them are the villain. Happiness is.
Highlights include:
Our side characters are all loveable, and it’s clear they exist to support the three siblings and aren’t a plot of themselves. I enjoyed the polyamorous representation, and bringing light Arthur’s conflicts about the love he feels for his wife, and the different love he feels for his partners, and the love he has for wanting to be loved. Eilidh and Dzyhulia shared a complicated, intertwined story namely one of comparison and gave a great story of ‘the grass is always greener. Jamie and Cass I could write an essay on how they’re foils for each other, and how love comes in different shapes and sizes. Be honest with those you love.
We only see each other at weddings and funerals’ is the phrase i’d title this whole thing. And the language? If you love Olivie-isms then this one is filled plenty with them. It’s delightfully unhinged.


This is...a lot. This review is a lot (mainly because I'm the most passionate about my highly anticipated reads when they let me down), so apologies if it's length. I'm extremely conflicted in my rating (either 2 or 3 stars) because i am REALLY rooting for Weavinghsaw to do well, except it missed the mark massively for me. This book was extremely easy to put down, and I didn't feel excited to pick it back up again. It was just...there.
I enjoyed small parts of the mystery (while I was still able to figure them out myself) and liked the unique magic system/ghost magic that was explained thoroughly, though would have loved a little more history about Lena's ghost work and why exactly she learns to do as she does (herself). Some of our characters are intriguing- namely the nobles in the latter half of the book and they were great at changing the dynamic.
Personally, this was sold to me as a dark academia, dark romantasy, gothic novel with political intrigue in which I believe it only hits 1/4 of those point- only dark romantasy. The author tries at gothic, but it's much more than just a dimly lit castle with ghosts. It's the setting, the world, the atmosphere, the horror- none of which was present. The political intrigue came across as very generic ('we hate immigrants') and then never gets explored after that. The romance also felt very copy/paste, and (if you go by tropes) is an insta-lust/slowburn, something that doesn't interest me at all (was expecting just slowburn). Lena is nothing but angry at everything and having this as our main narrator constantly made for some very repetitive thoughts i did not enjoy. I understand why she is angry, but that's all she is the whole book!
The beginning is extremely slow. Undeniably slow. Nothing happens for a very long time, and things that do pop up are immediately solved within that chapter. I was constantly told 'it gets better at 25%, no actually 50%, no actually i didn't buy it until 75%' and i don't understand why I should have to wait until over halfway for me to be hooked into the story. Suddenly the war is over, suddenly Rami got justice, suddenly we learn about the locket etc etc. Actions never had long lasting consequences (even the blurb of the book sets up the whole story to be about finding a lost brother- but he is found within 25%).
Over the course of the book, things stopped being mysterious. Anything that could have been intriguing was highlighted in the dialogue, almost like a 'HEY LOOK THIS WILL BE SUPER IMPORTANT LATER' arrow to the point where I wasn't figuring anything out and had my hand held the entire way. For an adult debut, this absolutely could have been in Young Adult/Upper YA as it read young (because our characters are naive and inexperienced).
Unfortunately, much of the story was clumsily revealed to us in a dialogue heavy, expositional chapter that ruined absolutely all of the mystery and the whole book from then on (about 70%) relied on dramatic irony. After The Wake chapter, the book went in a direction I had absolutely no interest in- demons. I wanted more political intrigue, I wanted to learn more of the world, but instead it went the other world route. With everything happening in the final 20% i couldn't help but wonder why this is a trilogy and not a standalone, at most a duology, since as a result of the ending i couldn't help but feel that all of the setup in this book was needlessly dragged out for no reason. It was a very open/closed case and story, that has now pivoted to something else entirely.
We also don't get to visit Weavingshaw until 60% of the way into the book. A strange choice, honestly. The ending is a cliffhanger that didn't make sense to me because:
I appreciate the effort that was made here- truly, and i can absolutely see this book finding its correct target audience, but sadly, to me Weavingshaw felt like a generic romantasy disguised in a gothic setting, and i'm extremely disappointed. I won't rush to get the sequel, but I will absolutely be rooting for it since It can be turned around, and I'd like to see how the author does that.


Crooked Kingdom (Six of Crows, #2)
Leigh Bardugo


Emily Wilde's Encyclopaedia of Faeries (Emily Wilde, #1)
Heather Fawcett


Don't Let the Forest In
C.G. Drews
my god the asexual rep in this is actually good. it’s actually researched & is fantastic, and unlike some ✨other mainstream aroace book✨ out there this one doesn’t like, alienate half of us from the whole community


readbyrebekah commented...
I don't really think I should be expected to research major things when I read a book. What a word means or a thruway line, sure. But the fundamental parts of the book I disagree- it should be in the book somewhere (a few sentences of why they do that, or how often or where it came from for example) .
No, I don't have a problem with relating to dragons since i'm sure they go through their own personal turmoil and conflicts that are explained to the reader. If you were to replace the FMC with a dragon, and not explain how their kind works I would still have the same review.
A book doesn't have to entirely resonate with me to enjoy it, but if you couple how specific it is to the author and where they're from with the fact that I know nothing about that specific area and the author expects me to already, it felt like a love letter or inside joke i wasn't privy to. I didn't feel like I could take ANYTHING from this book and apply it to myself. I'd like to at least relate to something in some way.
Maybe i'll try it again in the future, but relatability aside I still didn't like the book.
DNF - 49%
As a queer black reader, this has been on my radar since its announcement, and I am SO gutted. Death Card is said to be a dark romantic fantasy (for fans of Immortal Dark), and there's so much going on i'm not sure what to call it.
I can appreciate there being lots of inspiration, but this is not remotely as dark as the blurb made it out to be. I really liked the fated mates aspect, but this got little focus (because there was so much to focus on). I liked how this felt like the authors' love letter to her history and family, but that didn't resonate with me personally, which made it difficult to read at times.
My favourite parts so far were when she was just reading tarot, and would have loved to have learnt more about that but it felt like I was already supposed to know everything;
Firstly, the world- I can't see how this is pure fantasy when it is constantly mentioning real world, very present American politics. I don't understand any of the world or universe we're in (I do not know anything about New Orleans and yet it feels like I should). I don't understand why certain people get magic, if it's known to all humans, why these covens hate each other etc. What kind of magic is there and how is it passed on?
At 50% I'd like to have some semblance of the plot however we have racism, a murder mystery, the coven, ascending to witch queen and a romance all happening at once. All of these things can't be given equal attention and as a result I just don't believe any of what's happening most of the time. The conflict so far was extremely repetitive of 'I'm too young, I don't want to do this, I can't love this girl, i'm rivals with the other family for Valedictorian' and so on.
I really didn't get on with the authors writing (and I understand this is a YA book, but despite all the offhand comments and swearing it really reads younger YA). Unfortunately, it was very easy to put down and I didn't feel particularly excited to pick it up again each time.
eArc provided by NetGalley & GPP


readbyrebekah commented...
Dark Academia is not just aesthetics- you may be thinking of fashion? tbh i'm not sure where the aesthetic stemmed from so i'm likely wrong there.
It's moral ambiguity, the hunt for knowledge, discussions of intellectualism. Plenty of books have morally grey characters- it doesn't make them a dark academia book. It's 'how far would you go for your knowledge pursuit, and what does it cost you'. There's crossovers (as any good character driven story will have) but something like Girl Dinner fits psych horror more (and OB calls it a psych thriller/horror). it's not dissimilar to Don't Let The Forest In, also on this list.
You can have a gothic dark academia (not unlike some parts of Alchemised), you can have an urban dark academia (something like Katabasis), or a fantasy dark academia (like A Language of Dragons).
It's...academia. It has to be academic in some capacity. Usually this will be in a school (it's easiest) but it would have to involve fundamental knowledge being twisted or an issue with the 'establishment' that makes it the enemy. It's easy to do this in a school setting. You could do this in a library, university, book club, anywhere where there is the pursuit of knowledge for a higher reason in an establishment, in which there is a glaring issue.
G&T is urban fantasy, yes focusing on morals- that doesn't make it dark academia. There is no twisted establishment everyone thinks is good and aspires to be, nobody is inherently wrong about anything, there is no 'knowing too much is bad'. Atlas Six (Olivie Blake also) is a dark academia book. Meredith isn't wanting to learn everything, just have her successful company. She made it, failed, and is trying not to drown with it. It is closer to Girl Dinner than it is Atlas Six (in my opinion).
Evocation is mainly urban/gothic. It's about tarot and demons and witchcraft, what it means to be in charge and how easy it is to forget yourself. The second book leans a lot more into DA (with Rhys hitting many of the points i mentioned first) but the first one with David I wouldn't categorise specifically as DA. It's not the forefront of the book.
This is a bit long but i hope it make sense!! Also happy to chat, i love the genre so much. It's a fine line to toe sometimes and ive been burned by books that claim to be DA and are just fantasy books in a school setting, lol.
Girl Dinner by Olivie Blake would be a good add!