avatar

theaisreading

she/her | 24 | INFJ 🐏 đŸłïžâ€đŸŒˆ đŸŒ± romance sun đŸ©· mystery-thriller moon đŸ”Ș fantasy rising 🐉 welcome to my library! ₍₍⚞(˶˃ ê’ł ˂˶)⚟  

14609 points

0% overlap
Romantasy Starter Pack Vol I
Thriller Starter Pack Vol I
Romance Starter Pack Vol I
My Taste
Happy Place
Truly, Devious (Truly Devious, #1)
Expiration Dates
Red Queen
Ruby Red (Precious Stone Trilogy, #1)
Reading...
The Paris Match
0%

theaisreading commented on songbairds's update

songbairds made progress on...

10h
I Who Have Never Known Men

I Who Have Never Known Men

Jacqueline Harpman

75%
5
2
Reply

theaisreading commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum

1h
  • Question of the Day!

    Ciao Bookaholics!

    How is everyone?

    Im currently on an archaeology placement for uni and I recently read an Indiana Jones spoof romace book for a little bit of fun

    I want to know....

    Have you ever read a book related to your job/degree? And how did you find it? đŸ€”

    21
    comments 23
    Reply
  • theaisreading commented on theaisreading's update

    theaisreading started reading...

    2h
    The Paris Match

    The Paris Match

    Kate Clayborn

    12
    2
    Reply

    theaisreading commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum

    2h
  • AI Companies are buying Antique books to feed to AI models

    As the title says, AI companies are apparently buying Antique books and feeding the books to AI models. According to this Article called "AI Companies Are Buying Antique Books, Ingesting Their Contents to Train Models, and Then Destroying Them at Incredible Scale" (Article be found here) Says that "many companies, including Anthropic, have turned to ingesting physical books instead, which they can buy countless used copies of on the cheap. According to the settled lawsuit, Anthropic used a hydraulic powered cutting machine to neatly remove the pages from the books it procured from book resellers and then scanned them using industrial-grade imaging equipment. In other words, it was literally ripping off authors’ books to train its AI.

    This process took advantage of a legal concept known as first-sale doctrine, which allows a buyer to do what they want with a purchase without the original copyright holder’s say-so. And since Anthropic was turning the original physical texts into digital ones — rather than redistributing them as new copies — a judge found this to be “transformative,” and therefore protected by fair use."

    In the article they also mention a book seller stating "One small book seller said that in April, he suddenly went from selling no more than 20 books a week to hundreds, and he’s almost certain that the customers are AI labs, noting the random selection of the books and how they all have ISBNs. He added that his inventory is full with rare and out of print books, meaning that an AI company could be destroying some of the few remaining copies that can be found.

    “I personally have mixed feelings about all of this,” the bookseller told 404. “It benefits me financially as well as by clearing out old inventory that is otherwise unlikely to sell. I’ve been well-suited for these sales with inventory from overseas and foreign language books. On the other hand, I don’t like the end-use, and I don’t like that uncommon books are being pulped.”

    In this Article called "Rare book dealers fear tech firms are destroying obscure editions to train AI models" (Article can be found here) states that "Secondhand booksellers across Europe, including in the Netherlands, are raising concerns over AI companies buying large numbers of obscure and often rare books. The alleged intent behind such shopping is to scan and destroy them for AI training."

    And that

    "in June 2025 during a U.S. copyright lawsuit against Anthropic. Although the company behind chatbot Claude settled the case, booksellers say the proceedings established a troubling precedent: a U.S. court found that destroying purchased books for scanning purposes falls under fair use, provided the company legally owns the physical copies.

    That ruling is seen as a key reason AI firms are seeking older European books, which booksellers suspect are being shipped to the United States in large quantities.

    The demand reportedly reflects a broad search for new training material as developers of AI systems exhaust much of the language already available online. Companies are increasingly seeking texts that are older, less digitized, and harder to find on the internet"

    Clearly, this is awful for multiple reasons. The stealing of Human work being fed to Gen AI, the apparent destruction of rare antique books, which I know we have many books and not all of them can last and be preserved and collected forever, but to have these books be destroyed by gen AI companies instead of people seeing if they want to attempt to preserve these books is terrible.

    81
    comments 19
    Reply
  • theaisreading commented on Maefujoshi's update

    theaisreading started reading...

    2h
    The Paris Match

    The Paris Match

    Kate Clayborn

    12
    2
    Reply

    theaisreading wrote a review...

    2h
  • The Yellow Wall-Paper
    theaisreading
    Jul 28, 2026
    The Yellow Wall-Paper
    4.0
    Enjoyment: 4.0Quality: 4.5Characters: 4.0Plot: 4.0

    this was very short yet so haunting and impactful, and truly truly sad

    5
    comments 0
    Reply
  • theaisreading finished a book

    4h
    The Yellow Wall-Paper

    The Yellow Wall-Paper

    Charlotte Perkins Gilman

    10
    0
    Reply

    theaisreading commented on theaisreading's review of Summer Thaw (Summer Lovin' collection)

    5h
  • Summer Thaw (Summer Lovin' collection)
    theaisreading
    Jul 28, 2026
    Summer Thaw (Summer Lovin' collection)
    2.5
    Enjoyment: 2.5Quality: 2.5Characters: 2.5Plot: 2.5

    Oh boy, I don’t know...It seemed very sweet at first with a whole lot of "miscommunication" (it was really just non-communication), but then the guy mentioned something about knowing EVERYTHING about her already because he's been "paying attention", and I got the creeps. 😖 Other than that, nothing much really happens...still cute though I guess đŸ€·â€â™€ïž

    9
    comments 4
    Reply
  • theaisreading wrote a review...

    6h
  • Summer Thaw (Summer Lovin' collection)
    theaisreading
    Jul 28, 2026
    Summer Thaw (Summer Lovin' collection)
    2.5
    Enjoyment: 2.5Quality: 2.5Characters: 2.5Plot: 2.5

    Oh boy, I don’t know...It seemed very sweet at first with a whole lot of "miscommunication" (it was really just non-communication), but then the guy mentioned something about knowing EVERYTHING about her already because he's been "paying attention", and I got the creeps. 😖 Other than that, nothing much really happens...still cute though I guess đŸ€·â€â™€ïž

    9
    comments 4
    Reply
  • theaisreading wrote a review...

    9h
  • The Missed Connection
    theaisreading
    Jul 28, 2026
    The Missed Connection
    3.5
    Enjoyment: 3.5Quality: 4.0Characters: 3.5Plot: 3.5

    This book had possibly the wildest plot twist I've ever read in a rom-com—so much so that I just wanted to laugh. 😭

    Our main character, Sasha, is as relatable as she is oblivious. I mean, girl, your dream man is literally right in front of you, yet you choose to chase another? That aside, I really liked the way her anxiety issues were written into her character. I was also generally a big fan of all the different characters we met, though especially the best friend read as if she were only written for Sasha... Overall, a very cute (and hot) story with just this side of believable. đŸ€­

    5
    comments 0
    Reply
  • theaisreading commented on spaceecowgirl's update

    spaceecowgirl finished a book

    6d
    Annie Knows Everything: A Novel

    Annie Knows Everything: A Novel

    Rachel Wood

    5
    3
    Reply

    theaisreading commented on jordynreads's update

    theaisreading made progress on...

    1d
    Summer Thaw (Summer Lovin' collection)

    Summer Thaw (Summer Lovin' collection)

    Rebecca Jenshak

    52%
    9
    0
    Reply