avatar

wisecraic

(any pronouns!) Maryland, USA 🩀Forensic Science, ARC Reviews, and Queer Panic ✚

6672 points

0% overlap
LGBTQ+ Sci-Fi & Fantasy
Level 7
Dark Academia
My Taste
If We Were Villains
Red Rising (Red Rising Saga, #1)
Captive Prince (Captive Prince, #1)
The Tainted Cup (Shadow of the Leviathan, #1)
The Dream Thieves (The Raven Cycle, #2)
Reading...
Corrections (Justice Series)
16%
Wuthering Heights
20%
The Strength of the Few (Hierarchy, #2)
0%

wisecraic made progress on...

7h
Wuthering Heights

Wuthering Heights

Emily Brontë

20%
5
0
Reply

wisecraic commented on wisecraic's update

wisecraic made progress on...

14h
Corrections (Justice Series)

Corrections (Justice Series)

Leanne Fiftal Alarid

16%
4
0
Reply

wisecraic wrote a review...

1d
  • Hexes and Foes (Agents of SPELL Book 1)
    wisecraic
    Feb 03, 2026
    3.0
    Enjoyment: 2.5Quality: 3.0Characters: 3.0Plot: 3.0
    📚
    ✹
    ☠

    I received an electronic ARC through Gay Romance Reviews.

    CD Rachels introduces readers to the world of Agents of SPELL with book one, Hexes and Foes. Readers follow former academic rivals, Luther and Taz, now that they are all grown up working professionals. Luther is an Agent of SPELL and Taz is a hexbreaker consultant. Together they must resolve the instances of mysterious dark magic that have been popping up internationally. But working together instead of competing brings far more in common than they would have initially expected, including a distracting mutual attraction.

    This urban fantasy is precisely what it purports to be. There are segments where the reader experiences flashbacks to Luther and Taz competing at school in addition to the current conundrum they are working on together. The characters are perfectly reasonable as is the running plotline. However, whenever there is a genre-typical plotline, it becomes more and more likely that I am going to compare to my favorite books which share common themes and plotlines. This story certainly is perfectly fine, but I am unsure that it stands out amongst its peers for me. I do not feel the tension between the characters that I tend to look for with rivals-to-lovers or enemies-to-lovers tropes. I do find the characters likeable, despite the lack of compulsion surrounding their relationship or propulsion of the plot.

    I would happily recommend this book for entertainment value with the understanding that it may not be a new favorite.

    6
    comments 0
    Reply
  • wisecraic finished a book

    1d
    Hexes and Foes (Agents of SPELL Book 1)

    Hexes and Foes (Agents of SPELL Book 1)

    C.D. Rachels

    9
    0
    Reply

    wisecraic made progress on...

    3d
    Hexes and Foes (Agents of SPELL Book 1)

    Hexes and Foes (Agents of SPELL Book 1)

    C.D. Rachels

    30%
    4
    0
    Reply

    wisecraic wrote a review...

    3d
  • The Stablehand's Submission
    wisecraic
    Jan 31, 2026
    3.0
    Enjoyment: 3.0Quality: 3.0Characters: 3.0Plot: 2.5
    🐎
    ⏳

    Precisely as much a PWP as you would expect. Needed a short historical fiction for a challenge. Not opposed to reading longer works from this author.

    6
    comments 0
    Reply
  • wisecraic is interested in reading...

    3d
    Silver Blood

    Silver Blood

    Talli L. Morgan

    3
    0
    Reply

    wisecraic wrote a review...

    3d
  • The Forget-Me-Not Library
    wisecraic
    Jan 31, 2026
    3.5
    Enjoyment: 3.5Quality: 4.0Characters: 3.5Plot: 3.5
    💹
    📚
    🐈

    I was surprised to enjoy this as much as I did. This is very, very light fantasy to the extent of being primarily contemporary. And it deals with two women finding their paths in a small, southern town. Typically a story I wouldn't have any interest in at all, this was featured by Owlcrate in their Advent Calendar for 2025. Figured I would give it a shot and the narrators really sold me on this one. Particularly the southern accent on Tallulah's narrator, which reminded me a lot of being with family. It's giving Hallmark movie, but was shockingly pleasant.

    6
    comments 0
    Reply
  • wisecraic wrote a review...

    5d
  • The Scorpion and the Night Blossom (The Three Realms, #1)
    wisecraic
    Jan 30, 2026
    3.5
    Enjoyment: 3.5Quality: 3.5Characters: 3.5Plot: 3.0
    🐉
    🩂
    🌾

    I have mixed feelings about this story. It doesn't necessarily stand out amongst its peers, but it certainly isn't bad. Feels quite YA despite being included in FairyLoot's Adult box. I wouldn't be upset to continue, but I'm also sort of over some of the main tropes here. Writing is fine. I do like the incorporation of mythological inspiration here. Not sure if this is the story for me at this point of my reading journey.

    3
    comments 0
    Reply
  • wisecraic finished a book

    5d
    The Scorpion and the Night Blossom (The Three Realms, #1)

    The Scorpion and the Night Blossom (The Three Realms, #1)

    Amélie Wen Zhao

    5
    0
    Reply

    wisecraic made progress on...

    6d
    Hexes and Foes (Agents of SPELL Book 1)

    Hexes and Foes (Agents of SPELL Book 1)

    C.D. Rachels

    13%
    4
    0
    Reply

    wisecraic made progress on...

    1w
    The Scorpion and the Night Blossom (The Three Realms, #1)

    The Scorpion and the Night Blossom (The Three Realms, #1)

    Amélie Wen Zhao

    50%
    6
    0
    Reply

    wisecraic commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum

    1w
  • dottles
    Edited
    underrated classics?

    i'm intrigued - does anyone else have a classic (or just super popular) book that they think is sort of underrated? like a book that is well-known and well-respected, but isn't getting its due for the right reasons? or a book with a reputation that makes people less likely to read it?

    for me, i think the handmaid's tale gets the right amount of credit for worldbuilding/speculative work, but i've never seen much appreciation for atwood's narration itself, especially her depiction of re-living trauma. also, i was taught othello in school as important for its discussion of gender and race. all true, but i've seen lots of people go in thinking it's quite serious, and totally missing all of the jokes (which is half the point)

    would love to hear new perspectives on old favourites!

    23
    comments 43
    Reply