safe to say I’m particularly sick of how men write women now that I’m re-reading The Great Gatsby, so I thought, why not get everyone to comment the best and worst male writers for writing female characters.?? I’ll start with Ian McKewan as he writes women very well

"there was only one woman I could stand to be around right now"

nick you are such a fucking misogynist go is the only woman you can stand at any time full stop, it's a miracle amy even married you in the first place

imma just come out and say it! that family tree on the first pages might as well have been written in sanskrit, i would have understood just as much😭😭 those two pages had me like this, again and again:

so i got to work😌 and here’s my interpretation of the family tree with the disclaimer that i have never studied the Mahabharata i.e. my knowledge is limited. therefore, pls correct me if i have something down wrong.

before i get to it (i promise i will soon), here are some notes about the significance of the formatting:

• {name in bold and in curly brackets}: very significant for the events in the following/current generation
• name in bold: important person, this name is relevant for the further lineage.
• name in italics: might be an important person in the story, but not that central to understanding the lineage
• as i move down the lineage, some names get "downgraded" in their formatting, as their relevance to understanding further lineage decreases

so here goes:

THE STORY STARTS IN THE GENERATION OF SHANTANU

Shantanu has Devavrata aka Bhishma by his first wife, Ganga in her human form (Jahnavi). He goes exclusively by Devavrata in the first part of the story. As the POV shifts from Ganga to him, he is going by Bhishma.

Those two are also the chacracters through whom this story is told (for now, at least).

〰️〰️〰️

THE SECOND GENERATION

Shantanu then weds Satyavati (a "commoner") many years after Ganga has returned to being a river.

In addition to Bhishma from his first marriage, he fathers the sons Vichitravirya and Chitrangada by her.

None of his three sons produce heirs, for different reasons. His third son, Vichitravirya does get married to the sisters Ambika and Ambalika (not Amba, though, the third sister, who is also mentioned in the family tree). Unfortunately, Ambika and Ambalika end up widowed.

Satyavati also has a son outside her marriage with Shantanu. Shantanu does not adopt him, as far as I understand it, and he initially lives outside the palace. His name is {Vyasa} (important).

〰️〰️〰️

Summary of the Second Generation

• Shantanu + Ganga (1st wife) = Bhishma/ Devavrata (goes by both)
• Shantanu + Satyavati (2nd wife) = second and third sons, Vichitravirya and Chitrangada
• Satyavati (2nd wife) + a union before marriage to Shantanu = {Vyasa}, her first son

〰️〰️〰️

THE THIRD GENERATION

{Vyasa} becomes very important to the whole dynasty after Shantanu’s sons all fail to produce an heir.

Now, the royal line continues through {Vyasa}, as he fathers children by the widows Ambika and Ambalika (widows of Shantanu's son). Those children are:

• {Dhritarashtra}, the firstborn, who is blind and judged unfit to rule because of that.
• {Pandu}, the younger brother, who ends up ruling instead.
• Vidura, third brother, whom he fathers through a maid.

〰️〰️〰️

Summary of the Third Generation

• Vyasa + Ambika = {Dhritarashtra}
• Vyasa + Ambalika = {Pandu}
• Vyasa + a maid = Vidura

〰️〰️〰️

Where are we in the story when Bhishma's POV begins?

I think the third generation of Dhritarashtra and Pandu are middle-aged, and their children, the fourth generation, range from being children to late teens.

This means Bhishma aka Ganga’s son is the only surviving offspring of Shantanu, and he is now already an old man. People address him as Pitamaha (grandfather).

〰️〰️〰️

THE FOURTH GENERATION

{Dhritarashtra} and {Pandu} have each fathered their own two groups of children, and this is where the heart of the story lies.

When the story commences in part two, {Dhritarashtra} is the one ruling Hastinapur, even though {Pandu} had originally been made king because Dhritarashtra was considered unfit to rule due to his blindness. However, something happens so {Dhritarashtra} becomes the de facto ruler.

Their children are referred to as such:

• Dhritarashtra's 100 sons = {the Kauravas}
• Pandu's 5 sons = {the Pandavas}

Alongside Dhritarashtra, these children are some of the important characters we get introduced to in those first chapters of part two.

The main thing to remember is that the two groups of children split into two opposing family factions, which are respectively called the {Kauravas} and the {Pandavas}. It’s also useful to remember a couple of key characters on each side:

The main {Kaurava} brother is {Duryodhana}, who is also the heir to the throne.

The main {Pandava} brothers seem to be {Yudhishthira} and {Arjuna}. There is also Bhima who is mentioned a bit less.

〰️〰️〰️

Summary of the Fourth Generation

• Dhritarashtra + Gandhari* = {the Kauravas} = {Duryodhana} and 99 others (born through a mythic process)
• Pandu + Kunti and Madri (his two wives) = {the Pandavas} = {Yudhishthira}, {Arjuna}, Bhima and two other sons

〰️〰️〰️

OTHER CHARACTERS IN THE BIG FAMILY TREE

* = Shakuni The wife of Dhritarashtra, Gandhari, has a brother. That is Shakuni, and he is also included in the family tree. As far as I understand it, he is a shady, scheming figure on the Kaurava side.

Draupadi All five {Pandavas} are married to her. They all have children by her, but the only child mentioned in the book's family tree is Abhimanyu, who is Arjuna's son from a different marriage.

Karna He is on the {Kaurava} side as {Duryodhana’s} close friend and ally. Included in the tree (albeit outside the main one for the Kuru line) because of his importance in the story.

〰️〰️〰️ 🏞️🔹🌀🏞️🔹🌀🏞️ I have NO IDEA if this is any easier than the family tree for other people than me, but I hope it helps at least someone make some more sense of the very interesting Kuru lineage (aka the lineage of this royal family).