avatar

Julie28

I’m definitely a mood reader, and really good at dnf-ing lol! Mostly reading romance. Love discussing books (I will always answer if someone has an interesting take)🫶🏼✨🩷 she/her

1921 points

0% overlap
Iconic Series
Romance Starter Pack Vol I
Level 5
My Taste
Mockingjay
Twilight
Anne's House of Dreams
Normal People
Red, White & Royal Blue
Reading...
Fanfiction
100%
The Fires of Heaven
54%
avatar

Julie28 commented...

3w

When I think about it, I rarely if ever give books under 2.5 ⭐️. In my head I always have this little debate about how many stars I want to give it, and then I compare it to other books I’ve read. So I go ‘I really like this book but not as much as I like “x” but more than I like “y” and give it stars based on that lol!! Now that I think about it, that could mean that my whole scale is skewed lol.

  • How do you think of ratings?

    Taste is subjective, but the star rating system is supposed to communicate the average opinion of a book. However, the way we use the star rating system is also subjective. I’ve been wondering what other people mean when they give their ratings. So what do you think the different numbers of stars mean?

    For me: 5 = Perfect 4 = Great 3 = Good 2 = Fine 1 = Bad 0 = Terrible

    I’m curious whether this is about how others think or if folks have totally different rating systems in their heads.

    22
    37
  • avatar

    Julie28 commented...

    3w

    And what if I said that this kind of censorship is the reason we don’t have free democracies in more parts of the world!!!??!!!

  • Discord Book Server

    I was in this discord book server and to say the least it was........ questionable. I'm not going to say any names or anything like that for privacy obviously, I'm only going to say my experience that I had in there.

    I joined the book server and started to chat normally. And I said two things.

    "I could never get into it because in my opinion it was so weird, it has like a lot of anti-irish stereotypes in it" (Talking about ACOTAR) and ""For me I don't really care if they add more from the books or not. I mean the Harry Potter books have so any racist things in them like the name Cho Chang, or the bank goblins. I really hope the whole new Harry potter show gets canceled. JK Rowling has enough money as it is which she already donates to places that harms people." (Talking about the upcoming Harry Potter TV show)

    And I got a warning for these things. ""Hi there! I just wanted to throw a gentle reminder in here that we don’t allow any sort of chat that borders on bashing authors or yucking someone else’s yum. I understand and appreciate we all have different opinions on books and authors but let’s be mindful of how we’re speaking about them here please. We aim to keep this a positive place and don’t allow discussions on hot topics such as this to keep it that way! Thank you for understanding! "

    Now if you ask me, I was not being rude. I stated my opinion; I didn't say that everyone else had to share these opinions with me, I didn't say that if they liked ACOTAR or whatever they're a bad person. Nor do I think I was bashing an author. I was calling out the racist things written within Harry Potter (like the name Cho chang) along with what JK Rowling does, which there are plenty of articles about, that's not bashing an author to call them out on bigotry, where there is proof of said bigotry.

    There's more, but that's all I will share. I don't want to give out too many details in case someone recognizes it or anything like. I just thought it was a bit insane. Especially for a book server. A place where you're meant to discuss books at, which at times will include the author.

    Another thing that I will say is that me along with someone else in the Server were talking about Media literacy, the crisis that's going on, Project Hail Mary and how the author in an interview said that his works don't hold any social commentary and how that's insane, and one of the mods replied with "I guess that would depend on what you mean by media literacy I suppose. If you mean the analysis of books, not necessarily. It just depends on the themes you’re pulling out of the books. If it deals with any sort of political or social issues that cause controversy, then no we don’t allow it. Any other analysis and discussion is absolutely allowed. You can discuss any books you’d like in our ⁠unknown channel or any of our genre chats." (The person I was chatting with asked about a warning why they got after talking about Media literacy and the others stuff said above, and this was the reply)

    I just find it hard to think about a book server that doesn't allow the discussion of social issues presented within the book. That makes it extremely difficult to analyze, critique and discuss the book because social issues and commentary is what makes up so much of books at times.

    Anyways, I just wanted to share this experience, because I thought it was just a little bit insane. There was more that happened, but as I said, I don't want to give more information than I already have in case someone might recognize it. I already feel like I shared a lot of information as is. I just think when talking about books, there are things that will always be discussed be it the author or the social themes and commentary within the book. Books do not exist within a vacuum.

    83
    40
  • avatar

    Julie28 commented...

    4w

    I changed mine to a placeholder just called fanfiction. Seems a bit weird though, so probably gonna report it🤗

  • Placeholder changed???

    The placeholder I’m using for the fanfic I’m reading rn turned into the new SJM book?? Anybody else have this problem, or even noticed it?

    8
    6
  • Placeholder changed???

    The placeholder I’m using for the fanfic I’m reading rn turned into the new SJM book?? Anybody else have this problem, or even noticed it?

    8
    6
  • avatar

    Julie28 is interested in reading...

    5w

    Book and Dagger: How Scholars and Librarians Became the Unlikely Spies of World War II

    Book and Dagger: How Scholars and Librarians Became the Unlikely Spies of World War II

    Elyse Graham

    The riveting, untold story of the scholars, librarians, and university professors who were recruited as spies during WWII and helped turn the tide of the war At the start of WWII, the US found itself in desperate need of an intelligence agency. The Office of Strategic Services (OSS), a precursor to today’s CIA, was quickly formed—and, in an effort to fill its ranks with experts, the OSS turned to academia for recruits. Suddenly, literature professors, librarians, and historians were training to perform undercover operations and investigative work—and these surprising spies would go on to profoundly shape both the course of the war and our cultural institutions with their efforts. In Book and Dagger, Elyse Graham draws on personal histories, diaries, and declassified OSS files to tell the story of a small but connected group of humanities scholars turned unlikely spies. Among them are Joseph Curtiss, a literature professor who hunted down German spies and turned them into double agents; Sherman Kent, a smart-mouthed history professor who rose to become the head of analysis for all of Europe and Africa; and Adele Kibre, an archivist who was sent to Stockholm to secretly acquire documents for the OSS. These unforgettable characters would ultimately help lay the foundations of modern intelligence and transform American higher education when they returned after the war. Thrillingly paced and rigorously researched, Book and Dagger is an inspiring and gripping true story about a group of academics who helped beat the Nazis—a tale that reveals the indelible power of humanities to change the world.

    0