avatar

astral.projection

in my gothic / medieval / yearning / historical fiction / litfic / classics era

9836 points

0% overlap
Dark Academia
Supporting* Women's Wrongs
Medieval Times
My Taste
Bury Our Bones in the Midnight Soil
Fates and Furies
Perspective(s)
Margo's Got Money Troubles
The Everlasting
Reading...
Solo per oggi
0%
Goddess of the River
9%
Razorblade Tears
14%

astral.projection made progress on...

14h
Goddess of the River

Goddess of the River

Vaishnavi Patel

9%
14
0
Reply

astral.projection commented on a post

17h
  • Razorblade Tears
    Thoughts from 13% (page 40 Ch 7)
    spoilers

    View spoiler

    12
    comments 10
    Reply
  • astral.projection commented on a post

    17h
  • Razorblade Tears
    Thoughts from 8% | Chapter 5 (middle)
    spoilers

    View spoiler

    9
    comments 9
    Reply
  • astral.projection commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum

    19h
  • Thinking Too Much About a Book?

    I’ve been reading Fourth Wing and posting my thoughts about it, and something I keep hearing, both here and in real life, is that I’m “thinking about it too much.” People often tell me that to enjoy it I need to “turn my brain off,” or just read it in a more “smooth-brain” way.

    Sometimes this advice is meant kindly, but it still leaves me feeling confused. Why would I ever want to turn my brain off while reading? That’s the opposite of what I enjoy about books.

    For me, reading is engaging my brain. Thinking about the story, the characters, the themes, the structure. That’s where the fun is. If I have to actively stop thinking in order to enjoy something, that just doesn’t make sense to me.

    And I don’t mean that as an attack on people who enjoy the book. Plenty of things can be flawed and still fun, I think the movie The Room is a perfect example of something that’s objectively messy but enjoyable for many people. But when I’m repeatedly told that the solution is for me to stop thinking about the book, it starts to feel like the problem is being placed on me rather than the book simply not working for me.

    I don’t like being overly negative about a book, and I definitely don’t want to be the person raining on everyone else’s parade. But I also don’t really understand the mindset of “turn your brain off to enjoy it.”

    My brain is honestly the part of me I like most. I read because I want it engaged. I read to think, to analyze, to imagine, and to stretch my mind beyond everyday life. That’s what makes reading fun for me.

    So when people say “just turn your brain off,” I’m always a little baffled because for me, if my brain isn’t involved, the magic of reading disappears.

    49
    comments 36
    Reply
  • astral.projection wrote a review...

    21h
  • Enchiridion
    astral.projection
    Mar 10, 2026
    4.5
    Enjoyment: 4.5Quality: 5.0Characters: Plot:
    🏛️
    ⚖️
    🧠

    Bite sized pieces of wisdom on how to live well, summarized by the last line of Book 29:

    You must be one man, either good or bad. You must cultivate either your own reason or else externals; apply yourself either to things within or without you — that is, be either a philosopher or one of the mob.

    Epictetus shows us very clearly the value of being a philosopher, and how to actively live these ideas.

    7
    comments 1
    Reply
  • astral.projection wrote a review...

    1d
  • The English Patient
    astral.projection
    Mar 10, 2026
    3.0
    Enjoyment: 3.0Quality: 5.0Characters: 4.0Plot: 3.5
    🏥
    💣
    🫂

    After finishing the book and watching the movie trailer I realized that my faint memory of the movie poster mislead me into believing this is an (extremely literary) romance. THIS IS NOT A ROMANCE I repeat NOT a romance.

    I'm not quite sure how exactly to classify this--vignette, poetry, dream, experimental narration. I've been reading analysis to really understand it. It is extremely challenging, shapeshifting, lyrical and confusing, but ultimately very beautiful. Like a moving, brilliant dream where you remember the gist and some crystalized moments, but cannot piece the whole thing together.

    Michael Ondaatje is a poet, which I learned after the fact but is very good context to go in with. Much of this story takes place in the deserts of Egypt and Libya, in the shifting sands and illusory landscape. Ondaatje has crafted this book with the essence of the shapeshifting desert, experimenting with perspective, memory, fact and identity. All of it changing, all of it beautiful.

    6
    comments 0
    Reply
  • astral.projection TBR'd a book

    1d
    Kitten

    Kitten

    Stacey Yu

    5
    0
    Reply

    astral.projection commented on Literary.leveret's review of American Rapture

    1d
  • American Rapture
    Literary.leveret
    Aug 22, 2025
    1.5
    Enjoyment: 1.5Quality: 1.0Characters: 1.0Plot: 2.0
    ✝️
    ❤️‍🔥
    🧟‍♂️

    View spoiler

    4
    comments 4
    Reply
  • astral.projection commented on a post

    1d
  • A Dead Djinn in Cairo (Dead Djinn Universe, #0.1)
    Can I read this before A Master of Djinn?

    I'm debating reading the novella before the readalong starts so that I can then directly jump into A Master of Djinn, but I'm wondering if it might give information away from the main story?

    For people that have read both, would you recommend starting with the novella, or with A Master of Djinn?

    Thanks!! 💫⭐

    10
    comments 6
    Reply
  • astral.projection commented on robyn00's update

    astral.projection commented on villainessraexxxvii's update

    villainessraexxxvii made progress on...

    1d
    The English Patient

    The English Patient

    Michael Ondaatje

    19%
    5
    5
    Reply

    astral.projection made progress on...

    1d
    Enchiridion

    Enchiridion

    Epictetus Epictetus

    87%
    7
    0
    Reply

    astral.projection made progress on...

    1d
    Razorblade Tears

    Razorblade Tears

    S.A. Cosby

    14%
    12
    0
    Reply