brittwarren wrote a review...
I wasn't entirely familiar with the concept of absurdism before I read this book, but I definitely understand it now. Life is meaningless, but you should still find meaning and happiness along the way.
I went into this completely blind. I had no idea what to expect, so every new moment had me surprised. Whether it was good or bad is irrelevant. Each part had me feeling an entirely different way.
In part 1, I didn't like how careless the MC was. Life was just happening to him, and he was letting it pass him by. He befriends people who are not good people, and is basically a bystander in his life. (Also, f*** the animal and woman abusers.)
Then, in part 2, my feelings almost changed. I still stood by my original thoughts, but you start to see that the MC does have emotions buried within. There's an unsettled feeling throughout the entire story, but it really shines towards the end when the MC is being judged as an outcast because he didnt behave the way certain people wanted him to behave.
This story touches on so many aspects, and it'll take a while for me to process them all. Though, I do get to walk away with a new favorite quote: "I opened myself to the gentle indifference of the world."
brittwarren earned a badge

Summer 2026 Readalong
Read at least 1 book in the Summer 2026 Readalong.
brittwarren finished a book

The Stranger
Albert Camus
brittwarren commented on a post
brittwarren commented on a post
I read and analysed The Stranger over a decade ago in French as mandatory literature for my high school class. Back then, I hated it because it made no sense to me, even though I understood the point of absurdism, the historical context of the book's publication, and the whole "Camus is a genius because the sun is secretly a metaphor for..." argument. Later, I chalked up my near-disdain for Camus to the fact that French is my second language. No matter how bilingual I became, perhaps the point escaped me because I couldn't quite feel the language.
A couple of years go by, and I see it on Pagebound as a seasonal readalong. I think to myself: Well, you read the book when you were17. You've changed, evolved, acquired a few more brain cells (thank God, because if I had to go through life with my 17-year-old mentality, I wouldn't get far). Maybe it's time for a reread with fresh eyes.
✨ No. ✨ Turns out I still dislike it.
I don't hate it as much as I did back then, but I dislike it. I'm reading it in English this time, which is still not my native language, but I don't think I can blame the language barrier anymore. I just can't get over how clinical the text feels. Meursault continues to be the literary equivalent of elevator music.
And I know why it is written that way. But... why though? At least it's a very short book.
I understand that this is probably the point. I yearn for meaning. Meursault refuses to provide any. Camus is likely delighted by my irritation. Having reached this conclusion after an unnecessarily long analysis of my own thought process, I've arrived at a paradox: perhaps I both like and dislike this book at the same time. Perhaps Camus won this argument decades before I was born. The smug scoundrel...
Please, dear readers and fellow discussants, use this opportunity to vent about your hatred for the book and know you will not be judged here, or tell me why I'm wrong.
But just know that, according to Bertie, none of it matters anyway.
brittwarren commented on a post
“This has been going on for eight years.”
Dogs are too kind for this world to understand abuse. Salamano needs his a** beat for ten years.
brittwarren commented on a post
brittwarren commented on a post
brittwarren commented on a post
not sure why but the narrator feels like he would be Holden Caulfield all grown up and I don’t know if that’s a good thing
brittwarren started reading...

The Stranger
Albert Camus
brittwarren wrote a review...
This book was really fast paced and was predominantly a fun read.
It's really cool to notice and theorize the connections between this book and WUTLH, as well as the overarching storyline that Kliewer is building. The author is great at creating a creepy atmosphere and getting your heart racing (don't let it go over 150 bpm, though 😉).
This is a good mind f*** story. You start questioning what's real and if everything happening is truly happening. I can't wait for more books in this world.
brittwarren finished a book

The Caretaker
Marcus Kliewer
brittwarren commented on a post
brittwarren commented on SamPlatinum's review of Obstetrix
My Selling Pitch:
Dystopian horror except it’s actually just gynecological science vs fundamentalist cults so a fuckin’ Tuesday in today’s political hellscape.
Pre-reading: Pink horror covers are gonna do it for me every time. Who hates needles and loves books that make her squirm? This gal.
(obviously potential spoilers from here on) Thick of it: Ha. Love the technically blonde vs midwestern blonde.
And you’ve been drugged now, girlie.
I feel like liberal women are appropriately panicked because we see this on the horizon for ourselves. I don’t think it’s overreacting. I think everyone else is incredibly underreacting.
Them: Satan says come or else (threatening) Samantha, a brat to her core: do you promise?
So if they’re raising laying hens, why are they eating shelf-stable eggs? Also, winter is not calving season. You don’t want calves born out in the snow. You aim for spring and then some of them just come early.
I don’t know if I can read this book. It’s upsetting me a lot. Not at its quality just like things are so shit for women. Very The Natural Way of Things and Annie Bot.
I mean, ironically, this is kind of like that Female Fantasy terrible romcom I read because she is using fantasy romance to make it through. She just like us for real.
Not a fucking Harry Potter reference.
Oh girl, beat his illiterate ass.
Again, I don’t know if I can read this because of the visceral rage it triggers in me.
If you can read this without rage screaming, I applaud you.
Like how do you read this and not weep because it’s real!
A me!
Hell yeah, your baby did not consent to choking. We are not normalizing this number one predictor of fatal domestic abuse.
You know that schizophrenic symptom where people become convinced the media is talking to them? Stop putting my name in the fucked up femme horror books. Like I know it’s just a coincidence and I have an incredibly common name, but girlllll.
Romance books treated like illicit drugs makes me wanna sob. Like wake up. Reading is political. They are moving against literacy right now.
Girl, how do you not text 911? Be for real. Copy-paste that bitch over.
This is a 3.5. It’s too rushed, but what's there is good.
Post-reading: I think this is a strong three. Here’s the thing, the premise is so good, and the most important thing to take away from this dystopian horror book is that this isn’t a dystopian. This is happening in America right now. This is happening all over the world right now. People’s stupid religions are getting women killed because they refuse to believe in science, and that should horrify you. I don’t understand the critiques of this book complaining that it’s not horrific enough. I think if you read this without understanding the depths of the horror of this situation, you’re only processing the surface-level trauma. Maybe if you haven’t been denied something just because god said so, you just can’t fathom it, but that shit lingers. It’s so embedded in the language you use. I’m so far removed and so anti-religion now, and I still say oh lord and oh god constantly. I still panic I’ve immaculately conceived the second my period is late. Gaslighting framed as morality is so sticky.
But as much as I like this book’s concept, it’s way too short for what it wants to accomplish. It picked excellent themes. I loved the reading as resistance angle. Fantasy romance as the gateway drug to feminism is gonna resonate with a lot of readers. The ending is way too rushed and unbelievable, and we’ll come back to that in a bit, but I have a funny feeling that it was maybe written as a tribute to the author’s own father. I like the parallelism of her dad fought a war, and now she’s also a soldier in the war on women’s bodies.
We don’t get enough of a deep dive into character backstories, so all the cult members end up feeling pretty flat, but we also didn’t really have the page count to do that. I think the opener, her legal battle, actually ends up distracting from this plot a bit. I understand that it works as a device to isolate her because if she were a successful doctor, she would be reported missing, but it muddies the messaging a bit. The legal battle is upholding the patriarchy and capitalism using religious tenets as an excuse. The cult is still going against the government’s rules, and then her rescue doesn’t come from a government agency. Do you see what I’m getting at? We’re not really critiquing the government or capitalism in this book, but it’s such a driving opposite force to so much of this book’s plot that it feels neglectful to not address it.
The cult itself is more of a stereotype, than a realized threat. We don’t take the time to learn their beliefs, and we don’t have to to get the book’s message across. It’s very insert whatever fundamentalist religious group you like, they’re all bad. But that’s not a book exploring a conflict in good faith. It has no empathy for the cult members. The book can’t conceive of a world where women are there voluntarily and men aren’t upholding it for their own sexual gain. And I think having come off of a bunch of books with similar plots because cults are wicked trendy right now, it’s further highlighted for me. Girl Dinner and Make Me Better are phenomenal examples to contrast books like Yesteryear and Trad Wife. The former genuinely empathize with the people seduced into these high-control groups. Their narratives put you in the position to be seduced alongside the characters. They show you how someone could become convinced that something incredibly toxic for them would actually help them. And this book and the latter two don’t do that. They’ll tell you. They’ll tell you that a character understands that what they’re doing is bad but that they think the ends justify the means. Unfortunately, this always comes off as disingenuous. People largely don’t think they’re being the villain. It’s like the authors can’t cope with the cognitive dissonance and end up telling on themselves. It’s a biased take. We come in with a feminist slant and framing regardless of whether that fits the character’s own beliefs. And it’s not book ruining, but it will keep a book from a five star. We needed more about the cult’s language editing. We get a glimpse of it with the yoga positioning and the chronic chaperoning, but we don’t get a good example of the self policing that cults rely on. We never see the main character break. There’s no bargaining, there’s no shift, there’s just quiet endurance. And while that works for a little bit, I think it’s important to illustrate the manipulative tactics that cults use that increase susceptibility. The main character sees no benefit to being in this environment, but the people living there have to or the believability falls apart. And it’s frustrating because this book seemed like it was on the cusp of getting there, of taking that final step the whole time. But without going far enough… the stakes end up feeling like a scary detour rather than genuine peril.
I still like the book. I still think it’s worth the read. I just wish it was more. I want this book done with a mashup of Blake and Gailey and Felker-Martin’s style. I want that biting humor, and debauched sex appeal, and abject horror that those writers are capable of providing. This read more like a debut, and it’s not. I would pick the author up again if I like the concept of her next book, but I wouldn’t go out of my way to read her again.
Who should read this: Feminists Religious commentary fans Cult horror fans
Ideal reading time: Winter
Do I want to reread this: I wouldn’t read this book again because I’ll remember it, but I would like to read a different version of this book again.
Would I buy this: Yes
Similar books:
brittwarren commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
A general question, but where do you all get your recommendations from for books? Every so often I surf a particular sea and look at new releases and like anything that I think sounds interesting or good, I install download it on my kindle or I’ll look through Pinterest for recommendations. But I’m curious as to how everyone finds books to read so please let me know so we can all maybe find recommendations. Any unconventional or unusual ways. Bookshop wandering. I want to hear about everything! ✨
brittwarren commented on a post
brittwarren commented on a post
Post from the The Caretaker forum