pearl_reads commented on a post
pearl_reads commented on al1ta_a's update
pearl_reads commented on crybabybea's update
crybabybea earned a badge

Universe Quest: Octavia Butler's Afro-Futuristic World
Champion: Finished 5 Side Quest books.
pearl_reads commented on a post
pearl_reads commented on a post
pearl_reads commented on a post
pearl_reads commented on pearl_reads's update
pearl_reads is interested in reading...

Born a Crime: Stories From a South African Childhood
Trevor Noah
pearl_reads is interested in reading...

Born a Crime: Stories From a South African Childhood
Trevor Noah
pearl_reads is interested in reading...

The Glass Castle
Jeannette Walls
pearl_reads is interested in reading...

An Arcane Study of Stars
Sydney J. Shields
pearl_reads commented on a post
pearl_reads commented on a post
pearl_reads commented on a post
pearl_reads commented on a post
pearl_reads commented on antihero's update
pearl_reads commented on helli's update
pearl_reads commented on a post
pearl_reads commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
just curious to kind of survey people: does anyone have a particular preference for books of a certain length? i’ve realised that i generally feel more drawn towards books on the short (<300 pages) side, and im curious about people’s different preferences and why!
personally i like reading books that don’t have a ton of worldbuilding or plot and instead are more on the character-based or even experimental side, and those tend to be much more effective when short, but i’m curious how other people feel.
i remember someone saying about film that films under 100 minutes tend to be easier to like because of their brevity, and films over 180 minutes are easier to admire because of their ambition, but films in the middle really have to work to stand out and honestly i find that rings true not just in film but in books too! most of the doorstoppers i’ve read, i really enjoyed, whereas books between 350-500 pages are more hit or miss. but curious how others feel!