Lizzyfoureyes made progress on...
Post from the Legion: The Many Lives of Stephen Leeds (Legion, #1-3) forum
Lizzyfoureyes made progress on...
Lizzyfoureyes commented on karigan's update
Lizzyfoureyes made progress on...
Lizzyfoureyes made progress on...
Lizzyfoureyes started reading...

Legion: The Many Lives of Stephen Leeds (Legion, #1-3)
Brandon Sanderson
Lizzyfoureyes finished a book

The Moment of Lift: How Empowering Women Changes the World
Melinda French Gates
Lizzyfoureyes made progress on...
Lizzyfoureyes joined a quest
Fictional(?) Dystopian Societies ✊🏛️🆘
🏆 // 1182 joined
Not Joined



If you think real world societies are bad (you'd be right)... get a load of *these.*
Lizzyfoureyes commented on leitmotif's update
Lizzyfoureyes commented on leitmotif's update
Lizzyfoureyes commented on Lizzyfoureyes's update
Lizzyfoureyes made progress on...
Lizzyfoureyes made progress on...
Lizzyfoureyes commented on crybabybea's update
Lizzyfoureyes commented on Lizzyfoureyes's update
Lizzyfoureyes started reading...

The Moment of Lift: How Empowering Women Changes the World
Melinda French Gates
Lizzyfoureyes finished a book

Crown of Midnight (Throne of Glass, #2)
Sarah J. Maas
Lizzyfoureyes commented on karigan's update
Lizzyfoureyes submitted a feature request
I’d love a polling/voting feature available only to quest owners that allows us to create polls within a quest.
This would let quest owners: 🔹Poll members on the next readalong selection 🔹Vote on which books to add to a quest or series 🔹Gauge interest before committing to future reads or events
Restricting this feature to quest owners would prevent clutter or misuse, while still allowing members to participate by voting. This would make quests more interactive, help owners make decisions that reflect member interest, and reduce off-platform coordination (comments, external polls, etc.).
Overall, this would improve engagement, streamline planning, and make quests feel more collaborative without sacrificing structure or moderation.