avatarPagebound Royalty Badge

CatherineJ

Read widely though romance is taking up more space on my TBR these days. GMT-5 šŸ‡ØšŸ‡¦šŸ

42272 points

0% overlap
Fated Mates Book Club: Romance Books for Novel People
Classic Literature from the United States
British & Irish Classic Literature
Achillean Across Genres
Medieval Times
Cherry Blossom Festival 2026
My Taste
The Song of Achilles
Demon Copperhead
Persuasion
Funny Story
Lord of Scoundrels (Scoundrels, #3)
Reading...
Star Shipped
99%
Goddess of the River
40%
Mr. Impossible (Carsington Brothers, #2)
99%
Something About You (FBI/US Attorney, #1)
99%
Romeo and Juliet
75%
Get a Life, Chloe Brown (The Brown Sisters, #1)
38%

CatherineJ commented on Plankton's update

Plankton earned a badge

18h
Cherry Blossom Festival 2026

Cherry Blossom Festival 2026

127
29
Reply

CatherineJ commented on CatherineJ's update

CatherineJ earned a badge

1d
Level 15

Level 15

42000 points

207
111
Reply

CatherineJ commented on a post

4h
  • Les MisĆ©rables
    Thoughts from 2% (page 23)

    the way it’s taken me 2x 45 minute reading sessions to reach page 23 (out of 1152)… when you still see me posting in this forum at Christmas, DO NOT be surprised😭😭😭😭

    21
    comments 9
    Reply
  • CatherineJ commented on MollyQ92's update

    MollyQ92 made progress on...

    10h
    Ladies in Hating

    Ladies in Hating

    Alexandra Vasti

    48%
    15
    3
    Reply

    CatherineJ commented on SourRevenge's update

  • Something About You (FBI/US Attorney, #1)
    Thoughts from 39% (ch.9)
    spoilers

    View spoiler

    2
    comments 0
    Reply
  • CatherineJ wrote a review...

    8h
  • Heartbreaker (Hell's Belles, #2)
    CatherineJ
    Apr 04, 2026
    2.0
    Enjoyment: 1.5Quality: 2.0Characters: 1.5Plot: 2.5
    🌹
    ā³
    šŸŽ©

    While have enjoyed most of SM’s HRs, I’m afraid this one left me disappointed.

    I found the story repetitive and in need of some serious editing, especially in the last third. In other words, it was an ā€œold mattressā€ (see @guiltlesspleasures’s fun review below). How many times did we have to be told the FMC was from the south side of Lambeth? How many times did we have to be told that she didn’t feel worthy of a duke? How many times did we have to be told that the MMC was a good boxer but that the FMC didn’t believe him, even when she witnessed him fighting early in the book?

    There was a lot of action in this book. So much so that imo the romance took second fiddle. Because the romance was underdeveloped, I really didn’t understand what drew the couple together.

    But I think what bothered me most was the heavy-handed, preachy feminism. It was laborious and unsubtle. And in some cases, nonsensical. For example, the FMC notes that the network of 19th C. women (the Hell’s Bells) helping other women escape bad matches were doing it to help these women ā€œatone for the ultimate sinā€ of having a connection to a bad man. As if 95% of these women had any choice in who they married at that time!!! (The book was set in 1839.) Or that they would have known that their husbands and fiancĆ©es would be abusive or neglectful before actually being in an intimate relationship with them. Talk about patronizing. Also it blames the victim. There was more I didn’t enjoy, but I’ll leave it at that.

    10
    comments 1
    Reply
  • CatherineJ commented on guiltlesspleasures's review of Heartbreaker (Hell's Belles, #2)

    9h
  • Heartbreaker (Hell's Belles, #2)
    guiltlesspleasures
    Jan 08, 2026
    3.0
    Enjoyment: Quality: Characters: Plot:

    When I think about this book, I picture an old mattress. It starts out taut and bouncy, but as you roll toward the middle, it gets flabby and saggy. You find yourself wondering if you’ll ever be able to get yourself out of this dip, what with your middle-aged back problems and all, but you persevere, because Sarah MacLean. When you finally manage it, it is taut and bouncy again, but you’re just a little too tired to enjoy it.

    Basically, this book needs an unforgiving editor, stat.

    That said, Clayborn was delectable.

    4
    comments 1
    Reply
  • CatherineJ commented on a post

    13h
  • moski
    Edited
    pin
    wondering where to start? a brief guide to get you on your way!

    so, obviously there’s a lot of genre crossover in these books! but i thought i’d put together a little starter guide for this quest! below is a list of genres + the ā€˜strange plagues’ books that i think best represent those genres! so if you’re a big fan of one or more genre in particular, you’ll have some recommended titles to start out with :)

    climate fiction: the annual migration of clouds, how high we go in the dark, wilder girls

    fantasy: while none of these are strictly fantasy, the book of m is a good place to start for fantasy readers

    horror: leech, wilder girls, suffer the children, black hole, uzumaki (for body horror i especially recommend you check out uzumaki, black hole, and wilder girls - for botanical horror check out wilder girls - for gothic horror check out leech - for supernatural horror see suffer the children)

    humor: if you’re wanting something funnier or more absurdist, check out the animals in that country

    science fiction: almost all of these books are at least a little bit science fiction, but perhaps the most science fiction-y books on this quest imo are sleep donation, how high we go in the dark (this one even has space stuff!), and the memory of animals

    literary fiction: severance, how high we go in the dark, the memory of animals, the dreamers, the book of m

    speculative fiction: similar to scifi, most of these books include some elements at least of specfic! but i’d say maybe start out with the memory of animals or how high we go in the dark if specfic is your jam

    magical realism: the book of m

    thriller: the fireman, wanderers, suffer the children (the last one is more of a psychological thriller)

    young adult: the annual migration of clouds, wilder girls

    a lot of these are proper apocalypse/post-apocalyptic as well, but if you’re looking for something a little less apocalyptic in scope, i’d point you to sleep donation to start.

    if you want something a little quieter and gentler, the annual migration of clouds is a good bet.

    if you’re more into geographically confined stories - less global epidemics, more localized ones - i’d point you to the dreamers, uzumaki, black hole, wilder girls, and leech.

    also, in terms of mediums!

    • we have two graphic novels: one is a manga, uzumaki, and one is a renowned graphic novel, black hole.
    • we have two novellas: the annual migration of clouds and sleep donation.
    • two of these are pretty long epics: wanderers and the fireman.
    • and the rest are average length novels!

    if you have any further questions about genres / what books might suit your interests best, i’m happy to help steer you towards some starter reads!!! happy reading y’all šŸ’›šŸ„³šŸ¤øā€ā™€ļø

    103
    comments 36
    Reply
  • CatherineJ commented on a post

    13h
  • The Badge!

    Oh my goodness, it is perfection!

    75
    comments 59
    Reply
  • CatherineJ commented on notlizlemon's update

    CatherineJ commented on chip.m4b's update

    CatherineJ commented on gracie's update

    CatherineJ commented on moski's update

    moski earned a badge

    23h
    Level 12

    Level 12

    27000 points

    285
    76
    Reply

    CatherineJ made progress on...

    23h
    Goddess of the River

    Goddess of the River

    Vaishnavi Patel

    40%
    17
    0
    Reply

    CatherineJ commented on KittyGirl1996's update

    CatherineJ commented on a post

    1d
  • Something About You (FBI/US Attorney, #1)
    Thoughts from 34%- So much exposition

    The majority of this book is telling me all the backstories. Hardly any dialog and the chemistry between the main characters is superficial, at best. Here's hoping that spending a third of the book setting up the plot means that the rest will actually be romance and action in this romantic thriller.

    3
    comments 1
    Reply