avatar

gimmethathardcover

wdym my English degree isn't practical I read every day :((

1881 points

0% overlap
Made for the Movies
Rick Riordanverse
Level 5
My Taste
Nothing to Envy: Ordinary Lives in North Korea
Legend (Legend, #1)
An Ember in the Ashes (An Ember in the Ashes, #1)
The Song of Achilles
Unwind (Unwind, #1)
Reading...
On Writing Well: The Classic Guide to Writing Nonfictionmilk and honeyThe Hunger Games (The Hunger Games, #1)A Little LifePageboyHow to Stop Acting: A Renowned Acting Coach Shares His Revolutionary Approach to Landing Roles, Developing Them and Keeping them Alive

gimmethathardcover commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum

1w
  • kamilla
    Edited
    Bookish hot takes

    I recently finished the memory police and a good portion of the comments were very positive but I got a little annoyed at how familiar some of the less positive comments felt. They were all about how slow or confusing the book was, and I mention this here and not the forum because I’ve also seen it with a ton of other books recently (handmaidens tale, the house of sprits, ten thousand doors of January, the vanishing birds and the book eaters among others).

    So hot take 1, a slow book does not necessarily mean a bad book because pacing is dependent on the kind of story the author wants to tell. When the point is to show the passage of time or build up an atmosphere it’s actually better.

    Hot take 2, soft world building is often better than hard world building because you don’t have to know everything about everything in order to understand the plot or sympathize with the characters. In fact confusion in small doses can be good because it forces you to learn.

    Idk if I’m alone here? Just had get that out.

    46
    comments 33
    Reply
  • gimmethathardcover made progress on...

    1w
    The Hunger Games (The Hunger Games, #1)

    The Hunger Games (The Hunger Games, #1)

    Suzanne Collins

    22%
    2
    0
    Reply

    gimmethathardcover commented on a post

    1w
  • The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes (The Hunger Games, #0)
    Thoughts from 1%

    I’m finally ready for this! 🫣

    10
    comments 4
    Reply
  • The Hunger Games (The Hunger Games, #1)
    Thoughts from ch. 5 (page 85)
    spoilers

    View spoiler

    29
    comments 4
    Reply
  • gimmethathardcover made progress on...

    2w
    The Hunger Games (The Hunger Games, #1)

    The Hunger Games (The Hunger Games, #1)

    Suzanne Collins

    13%
    2
    0
    Reply

    gimmethathardcover commented on CatherineJ's update

    CatherineJ earned a badge

    2w
    Level 12

    Level 12

    27000 points

    210
    131
    Reply

    gimmethathardcover commented on crybabybea's review of Nothing to Envy: Ordinary Lives in North Korea

    2w
  • Nothing to Envy: Ordinary Lives in North Korea
    crybabybea
    Sep 21, 2025
    0.5
    Enjoyment: 0.5Quality: 0.5Characters: Plot:

    Awful. I want to call it under-researched but it's more than that; it's meticulously misrepresentative and disingenuous.

    Korean history is complicated, and North Korea is not a perfect nation. The North Korean government has made decisions that harm people, and their country has turned toward totalitarianism and surveillance especially in recent years. However, they are not a mindlessly evil dystopia plucked from 1984. There's a way to critique North Korea without leaning on sensationalism and orientalist framing. Nothing to Envy does not commit to this nuance with any integrity, dramatizing the often very real struggles of the North Korean people, essentially turning them into an exhibit for Western audiences to gawk at and feel pity for.

    Demick includes every possible shocking fact you could ever think of, creating an overwhelming gish gallop effect. There is such a deluge of information, an endless amount of names and stories and statistics that run from one anecdote to the next. It positions itself as authoritative and well-researched simply because of the amount of information thrown at you, regardless of whether or not the information is fairly presented or not. It's incredibly difficult to tell where real experience ends and fabrication or exaggeration begins.

    Despite its mind-numbing length and density, there's no historical context for anything that's happening. It's one thing to gloss over history for brevity's sake, and it's another thing entirely to pick and choose which contexts get omitted. It's a very intentional choice to craft a specific image. You simply can't write a book about North Korea without talking about its history in its entirety. It's impossible to understand how it exists as a country today without also understanding the historical context that led their government to make the decisions they've made.

    You cannot talk about North Korea's foreign policy and crumbling infrastructure without mentioning how the United States systematically bombed North Korea during the Korean war, destroying 85% of its infrastructure and killing 20% of its population. You cannot talk about the famine of the 1990s and how it prompted an exponential increase in defection and emigration without talking about the nonconsensual splitting of Korea into North and South, which left the North with mostly unuseable land. You cannot talk about their lack of resources and trade goods without mentioning that they are the most sanctioned country on the planet.

    Because of its calculated framing, the entire book comes across as extremely orientalist, purposefully. Every word is chosen very carefully to paint the most exaggerated, terrifying picture possible. Although Nothing to Envy claims to humanize North Koreans and show the reality of their everyday lives, what it actually does is paint them as stupid, clueless, and backwards; faceless masses that can't think for themselves, capitulate to an irrationally evil leader, and need the smarter, better, more developed Western world to save them.

    To position North Korea as something uniquely evil, uniquely horrific, and inherently "other" is unfair and harmful. In attempting to "humanize" the North Korean people, Demick dehumanizes them even further. The sensationalism is so extreme that North Korean citizens can't even exist as normal people. Every single action they do is scrutinized and thrown under a microscope to paint them as brainwashed and pathetic. They pick herbs and greens from the mountains to eat and use as medicine? How backward and barbaric. They're trading their produce at a community market? How sad, they can't have real jobs. They're performing a song celebrating their country? Brainwashed, how could they be so stupid?

    There's a certain kind of cruelty in the irony of writing a book that hinges on exaggerated messaging, while looking down your nose at a population that you dehumanize because you believe they are brainwashed and propagandized. You can criticize North Korea's leadership and attempt to humanize its citizens in a way that gives them the dignity of being a whole, complex nation with a rich culture, history, and complicated politics.

    Demick has created what essentially functions as a complete compendium of propaganda against North Korea: cherry-picked statistics, anecdotes without context, and half-truths. It's not co-opting or supporting the North Korean government to place it within its complex historical context. It's not endorsing Kim Il Sung to try to understand the country with depth and clarity. It is, however, racist, orientalist, and manipulative to write a book like this and position it as an empathetic, humanizing perspective.

    55
    comments 25
    Reply
  • gimmethathardcover commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum

    2w
  • cocoferm
    Edited
    Help - Non-fiction that reads like fiction!!

    I need help! Need a palate cleanser after being completely destroyed by "Alchemised". I read the Demon of Unrest by Erik Larson last year and loved the way this amazing non-fiction book reads like fiction. Can anyone recommend books like that.. does not have to be US History :) Thanks!!

    7
    comments 15
    Reply
  • gimmethathardcover commented on a post

    2w
  • The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes (The Hunger Games, #0)
    Thoughts from 3%
    spoilers

    View spoiler

    23
    comments 5
    Reply
  • gimmethathardcover commented on ReadaholicsAnonymous's review of Jane Eyre

    2w
  • Jane Eyre
    Jan 04, 2026
    2.5
    Enjoyment: 2.5Quality: 3.5Characters: 3.0Plot: 1.5

    I think if I had started at chapter ten and was big on slice-of-life stories, I might have liked this. I can see how the literary monarchs might add this to the canon, and if I squint a little I recognize why some might regard this as one of their favorite books. I of course consider it rather boring, long-winded, and lacking focus.

    1
    comments 7
    Reply
  • gimmethathardcover commented on ReadaholicsAnonymous's update

    ReadaholicsAnonymous made progress on...

    2w
    Jane Eyre

    Jane Eyre

    Charlotte Brontë

    100%
    1
    3
    Reply

    gimmethathardcover commented on a post

    2w
  • Normal People
    Thoughts from 52% (page 141)
    spoilers

    View spoiler

    13
    comments 9
    Reply
  • gimmethathardcover commented on a post

    2w
  • I’m Glad My Mom Died
    Getting into audiobooks

    I got this audiobook for free a couple years ago and am just now listening to it!! Very excited. I’m a big podcast person but I wanna try to listen to more audiobooks this year. Would love some recs!

    31
    comments 13
    Reply
  • gimmethathardcover commented on a post

    2w
  • Animal Farm
    Thoughts from 28% (page 40)
    spoilers

    View spoiler

    18
    comments 8
    Reply
  • gimmethathardcover commented on a post

    2w
  • Wuthering Heights
    Thoughts from 14%

    making me upset at the casting all over again FUCKKKKK

    33
    comments 6
    Reply
  • gimmethathardcover commented on a post

    2w
  • This is How You Lose the Time War
    Thoughts from 54%

    i heard the best way to go into this book is to trust the process and not get too wrapped up in understanding what is going on. also to read this when i have time to finish it in a day / weekend.

    i’ve been really enjoying it and going along for the ride! i don’t really feel like i have a super separate character in mind for red vs blue but im getting there! i have a feeling this will hit even harder on a reread!

    22
    comments 10
    Reply
  • gimmethathardcover commented on a post

    2w
  • Catching Fire (The Hunger Games, #2)
    Thoughts from 25% (page 120)
    spoilers

    View spoiler

    11
    comments 3
    Reply
  • gimmethathardcover commented on a post

    2w
  • The Hunger Games (The Hunger Games, #1)
    Thoughts from 6% (page 24)

    starting my reread of this series (reread of BOSAS TBD) so I'll be all caught up by the time the SOTR movie comes out💪🏻 haven't read this in over 10 years and it's super interesting being reintroduced to everything from Katniss's baby eyes while knowing everything that's to come and to have already engaged in so much discussion about this world and its politics. really excited to see what I'll notice now that I'm reading as an adult!

    20
    comments 8
    Reply
  • gimmethathardcover commented on a post

    2w
  • The Hunger Games (The Hunger Games, #1)
    Thoughts from ch. 2 (page 26)
    spoilers

    View spoiler

    27
    comments 16
    Reply
  • gimmethathardcover commented on louminster's review of An Ember in the Ashes (An Ember in the Ashes, #1)

    2w
  • An Ember in the Ashes (An Ember in the Ashes, #1)
    louminster
    Jan 03, 2026
    5.0
    Enjoyment: 5.0Quality: 5.0Characters: 5.0Plot: 5.0
    😥
    🤯
    💫

    This was my favourite book (next to the others from that series) I read last year. Definitely going to re-read it this year. Also the book that got me an apprenticeship

    1
    comments 3
    Reply