sunnycorners commented on a post
sunnycorners commented on a post
sunnycorners commented on a post
Post from the Don't Let the Forest In forum
sunnycorners commented on sunnycorners's update
sunnycorners wants to read...

What My Bones Know: A Memoir of Healing from Complex Trauma
Stephanie Foo
sunnycorners wants to read...

Reflections of Lilje Damselfly
Natalie Kelda
sunnycorners wants to read...

Adult Children of Emotionally Immature Parents: How to Heal from Distant, Rejecting, or Self-Involved Parents
Lindsay C. Gibson
sunnycorners wants to read...

Kitchen
Banana Yoshimoto
sunnycorners commented on a post
sunnycorners commented on a post
I am torn on whether to DNF this because of how many WHAT ON EARTH AM I READING moments or to finish it since I've already come this far. It is absolutely DISGUSTING sometimes - but somehow so fascinating.
sunnycorners commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
Tbh… I’m not a fan of the percentage update while reading. I don’t get the hype 🤷🏼♀️ I think it’s more work than necessary. I totally get the reading list updates, or reading goal updates. What does everyone else think?? What am I missing??
I’m curious why it was important enough to be added
sunnycorners wants to read...

Never Bet Against Occam: Mast Cell Activation Disease and the Modern Epidemics of Chronic Illness and Medical Complexity
Lawrence B. Afrin
sunnycorners wants to read...

Squire
Nadia Shammas
sunnycorners started reading...

Don't Let the Forest In
C.G. Drews
sunnycorners commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
This post is based on some thoughts I had after watching the video "performative readers, ‘book girlies’ & the aesthetification of books", by The Book Leo. It is a great video, I do recommend you to watch it!
But, basically, she gives her thoughts about how nowadays, especially with BookTok and similar, reading is becoming 'a performative act', and an aesthetic created around reading. She also talks about how people judge others based on what they read, like if someone only reads fantasy, then this person is not a true reader, is shallow, and all that blablabla that I believe most of us have already heard one day. And there is also the other extreme of people who follow a certain aesthetic and only read (or at least they appear to read) classics, are intellectuals, and simply put are the contrary of what she called 'book girlies' aesthetic.
Well, all that said, the video got me thinking about my own position as a reader, and what reading actually means to me:
A little background: I am graduated in language and literature, Portuguese and Ancient Greek in Brazil, and now I'm getting my PhD, in Classical Literature. So reading is a part of my job, and a big one. Not only that, but also reading the classics. Iliad, Odyssey, tragedies... and it is tiring. To the point that I took a break from reading as a hobby, and just now I'm getting back at it. And as a hobby, I only read the fantasy romance stuff. Am I less of a reader for it? Comparing to someone that read classical literature for fun? No. My point is: I don't think we should consider less of a reader someone that only read fantasy, romance, or fiction in general. Or think that a person is more intelligent than another because they've read classics only. Coming from a country where the latest researches show that the number of readers is decreasing fast, if you read, YOU ARE A READER. The type of literature doesn't matter. Just read what you like, and think, criticize, take notes, interact with the book you're reading.
Thank you for reading this long post! What are your thoughts on it?
Post from the The Hounding forum
sunnycorners finished a book

The Hounding
Xenobe Purvis
Post from the The Hounding forum