twinkgrylls commented on a post
twinkgrylls commented on twinkgrylls's update
twinkgrylls commented on twinkgrylls's update
twinkgrylls commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
Hi everyone, we're considering making quite a big change to Pagebound and want to get the community's opinion - please leave your feedback here!
We have debated for a long while the merits of upvotes/downvotes vs a pure "like" system. We deeply believe in community moderation and community curation, and felt that an upvote/downvote system would provide the tooling for such community moderation.
In practice, we've also seen a lot of downsides with this system. While there's no guidance for how to use downvotes, many people use it as a "disagree" button which can make people with unpopular opinions feel unwelcome to share their opinion (for example, if you share that you dislike a beloved character, you may receive downvotes).
Moving to a "likes" only system would hopefully foster an environment where opinions are discussed rather than silently judged, and people are less anxious to engage in the forums.
In the past there have been some very strong opinions both for and against downvotes - let us know what you think below
twinkgrylls commented on a post
twinkgrylls TBR'd a book

Babel
R.F. Kuang
twinkgrylls commented on twinkgrylls's update
twinkgrylls TBR'd a book

Woodworm
Layla Martínez
twinkgrylls TBR'd a book

Woodworm
Layla Martínez
twinkgrylls commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
I’m curious to hear about why you may or may not block a user? Do you use this feature? I’ve never been on a platform like this where it shows you comment unavailable to indicate that you are blocked.
I was recently chatting with another reader about the vibes of a book and they didn’t agree, but instead of engaging in further discussion (to which I would have loved to have heard what vibes they thought the book had) they blocked me. I’m kinda bummed and have never had that happen before.
I wanted to open the floor up to maybe understand better. I don’t think I would block a reader in that fashion. Maybe I would use the feature if someone was sharing triggering content related, but not to end a conversation. I’m just surprised and a bit hurt.
Edit: WOW. Thank you all for sharing your experiences, opinions, perspectives, thoughts. This has really helped me see this feature in a different light and was very helpful for me to read. I appreciate you all. 🫶🏻
twinkgrylls TBR'd a book

Japanese Gothic
Kylie Lee Baker
twinkgrylls commented on moondrop's review of The Stranger
Dear Diary Mood: Apathetic My life is spiraling downward
twinkgrylls commented on farron's review of The Archive Undying (The Downworld Sequence, #1)
About halfway through I was already wishing I could reread it because I knew I'd pick up more. I haven't felt this excited to reapproach a story since I mainlined The Locked Tomb and immediately turned around and listened to the audiobooks, so, it seems for once the comps for this book were on the mark.
The Archive Undying takes place techno-organic, body-horror cyperpunk post-apocalypse world where there's always one more thread to unravel. It drops you right into a landscape haunted by the giant corpses of dead AI "gods" and forces you to look at the story at a human-sized scale. It does not wait to see if you are adjusted to the setting - in fact it felt quite a lot like accidentally getting into a series midway through (I'd say about the third or fourth book in a long series), or watching an old animation OVA project, back when they'd release short work directly to the home market to focus on the most interesting bits to animate, regardless of where in the story that bits took place. This is dense and obscure and while I don't think it's intentionally unapproachable, it wants you to accept this world on the same terms its characters do, and Candon does not babysit readers about it. I do think there is a version of this that could exist much, much better as a graphic novel. The scope of its ideas and visuals would be stunning.
The Archive Undying takes on a lot of fascinating themes like body autonomy, free will, toxic cycles, and the horror of a world driven, destroyed, and once again driven by industry and innovation. Apparently the book got a lot of pushback for being "pro-AI," you could legitimately just say "gods" or "demons" or "spirits" within a fantasy setting and they would serve a similar narrative purpose. It is never once =depicted as a completely good thing that humanity would become so beholden and adoring toward powerful, controlling, and unknowable AI - the whole setting is predicated on the idea of the disasters that befall civilization in the aftermath of those AI failing.
I will say, occasionally it felt like the plot stalled because characters were standing around explaining things to each other, and yet somehow it didn't feel like I understood things any better. I think a few of the external conflicts and minor characters either needed to be fleshed out better, or trimmed.
This one feels like a cult classic in the making. I can understand completely why other people would bounce off it, but I had a great time with this one, and I hope I have time to dive into the audiobook while the novel is still a bit fresh in my mind.
twinkgrylls TBR'd a book

The Communication Book: 44 Ideas for Better Conversations Every Day
Mikael Krogerus
twinkgrylls TBR'd a book

The Communication Book
Roman Tschäppeler Mikael Krogerus
twinkgrylls TBR'd a book

The Atlas Six
Olivie Blake
twinkgrylls TBR'd a book

Lessons in Chemistry
Bonnie Garmus
twinkgrylls commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
It is the same here as everywhere else - if people even think you don't follow their reasoning, you get downvotes. This makes no sense and I think the feature should be removed. Especially as people can hide behind the anonymity of downvotes and don't need to think about it.
I am not sure people even try to understand what is written either, because downvotes happen (to everyone) even when they are saying the same thing from a different angle.
This is not how discourse or democracy work. If I can't have an opinion that's different from yours, then there is no point in talking at all. If you don't agree with me (or others) just don't upvote. Simple as that. By downvoting you are saying "your opinion isn't valued." Maybe that is what people want to say when they downvote. I don't know. Unless it is hate speech in any form or direct attack on someone, I don't see a reason to even think about using that feature.
If you happen to disagree, or you don't understand what is said, reply and explain or ask, please. I've seen people getting downvotes just for asking a question wrong or expressing some frustration.
My opinion is disregarded in the offline world often enough, I do not need people letting me think my opinion is worthless in places like this. It causes anxiety and confusion when I don't even understand why there would be downvotes to begin with. And I am certainly not the only one fearful of expressing opinions. Probably just the only one to say something openly, because that's me, expressing my opinions even when they aren't that popular. And I'm not pretending, like others might, that I am not affected by things.
So I won't be posting anymore unless it is in a book forum. And I know hardly anyone cares because you don't know me, or you will downvote this post because in your imagination this is somehow some sort of attention grabbing, or rage post or whatever. It is not. I'm frustrated, tired and disappointed, hurt and confused, as so often, and I think I have a reason to say so.
I hope eventually downvotes will be removed so everyone can talk without fear of being devalued.
twinkgrylls TBR'd a book

A River Enchanted
Rebecca Ross