paigehf commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
What’s everyone’s favorite “reading weather”?
I love a good snow storm…the quiet, the excuse not to go anywhere. Give me a candle, a blanket and a book please!
paigehf commented on cybersajlism's update
cybersajlism finished a book

Lolita
Vladimir Nabokov
paigehf commented on cybersajlism's review of Lolita
⚠️ Major trigger warning for CSA ⚠️
(4.25/5)
I’m sure no one is surprised to hear that this book is an extremely uncomfortable and difficult read. But honestly, I was surprised by how awful it was for me. I have read many books full of horrifying shit: abuse, trauma, you name it. I also work as a trauma therapist for a living and have many clients who have experienced sexual abuse in childhood. And yet, I truly was not prepared for how terrible it would feel to take a deep dive into the mind of the abuser Humbert Humbert.
Still, despite the discomfort of reading this level of moral depravity, I think this is a remarkable work of literature. Nabokov wanted to honestly and truthfully depict the mindset that leads a pedophile to sexually abuse a child and I think he accomplished that. This was an extremely believable and realistic representation of a pedophile narcissistic abuser, which is also what made it so vile. At no point is Nabokov presenting Humbert as a morally ambiguous or sympathetic character. He is very unambiguously a horrible person and the reader is never meant to feel anything but disgusted and horrified by him. At no point did this feel like it was romanticizing or justifying abuse. Anyone who says otherwise about this book has either not read it, or deeply misunderstood its intentions.
Getting more into specifics:
I think Nabokov’s choice to frame this novel with the fictional foreword, which presents Humbert’s confessional to come as the work of a criminal, to be studied as a psychological case study, effectively sets up the reader to understand that this is the work of an unreliable narrator. Humbert is immediately introduced as someone the reader should not trust at their word and has already been convicted for their crimes. In fact, Humbert wrote the entire story from solitary confinement, which also adds crucial context for understanding why he tells the story of his abuse in the way he does.
Throughout his (fictional) autobiography, Humbert continuously attempts to justify and explain his behavior, many times even speaking directly to the reader, imploring them to have sympathy for his “difficult affliction.” He states that he never wanted to hurt Dolores Haze, that he tried to prevent as much harm coming to her as possible, and other ludicrous and absurd statements that completely contradict his actions. He attempts to show off his intellect, hoping to convince the reader that he is smart, well-read, and cultured, and thus the abuse he perpetrated onto Dolores cannot be that bad. He brags about his appearance, with random interjections about how the reader must remember how handsome he was, how women threw themselves at him, how even Dolores herself was attracted to him. Unfortunately for Humbert, all of these attempts at manipulation only serve to make him look even more evil, insidious, and selfish. Nabokov perfectly encapsulates the mental gymnastics that abusers will do to tell themselves that what they have done is not that bad.
Humbert dehumanizes the children he is attracted to by referring to them as “nymphets” and sometimes even “demons,” which enables him to believe that whatever he does to these girls is not inhumane. He takes no interest in Dolores as a person and his interest in her is exclusively based on physical appearance. He spends long sections of the book describing various aspects of her appearance, but gives barely a passing thought to what she likes, what she dreams about, or what she feels about anything that isn't him. When Dolores begins to struggle because of the severe trauma she is experiencing, Humbert is frustrated by how her emotional dysregulation is an inconvenience to him. Everything in his mind is about his own personal gain, to the complete disregard of everyone else around him.
Living in Humbert’s mind felt gross and I hated every minute of it. But that doesn't make this a bad book, and I think that distinction matters. Still, it was a struggle to get through and I could not wait for it to be over. I definitely would not recommend everyone to read this, and honestly I’m still deciding if it was worth it.
paigehf commented on a post
This book really makes me want to start like a gift center where people can come and drop off anything they don't need and others can come and pick up anything they need for free, like a gift department store.
paigehf commented on a post
paigehf commented on a post
paigehf commented on TiniestBeetle's update
paigehf TBR'd a book

Crushed
Trinidad Escobar
paigehf commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
saw someone on booktube do this recently where they summed up their physical collection as a percentage of books that are unread as part of them reflecting on the topic of the overconsumption of books (i believe this has been discussed before so this post isn't really to touch on it, but feel free to share any thoughts if you'd like). i did the same with my own collection and i ended up being surprised by the result so i thought it would be fun to share here if anyone wants to join! so, i own 76 physical books and out of those, i've only read 27 (fully read, not partially) so that's 65% of my collection unread 😱 i genuinely didn't think it would be that high but it just goes to show how i don't keep close track of my owned books. part of my book goals this year is to tackle my physical tbr; i thought i had about 20-30 books to get through but evidently not. it'll be interesting to see how that amount/percentage will change by the end of the year (hopefully it'll be much less!)
paigehf commented on a post
paigehf commented on a post
paigehf commented on paigehf's review of On Beauty
View spoiler
Post from the Lolita forum
"admission by age; adults one dollar, pubescents sixty cents."
The way he uses the word "pubescents" is so creepyyyy 😭
paigehf commented on a post from the Pagebound Club forum
First my „problem“: I’m struggling a lot with rating books. I often go by vibe and how the book made me feel in the situation but when I look back at them a couple days later I feel completely different about them. I also don’t really like the 5 star system because so many books feel like a 4 star but on a scale to 10 they would all be between 6 and 8 which is quite a „large“ gap. I want to read more mindful this year or at least reflect a bit better on my books so I’m looking for a new approach to rate my books. I do like putting them on a scale but I’m also open for new maybe more „unique“ ways. Now the question: what are your ways to rate books?📚⭐️
paigehf commented on cybersajlism's update
cybersajlism is interested in reading...

Perfume: The Story of a Murderer
Patrick Süskind
paigehf commented on a post
The audiobooks is narrated by Wil Wheaton—who are did a few of Cory Doctorow’s books—and I keep imagining that this book is by Doctorow too. I’m enjoying this so far, but I find the main character kind of annoying. I’m hoping there’s more character development as the story continues. I love a book about gamer culture, I just wish this one weren’t about such a stereotypical gamer character (high school guy who’s awkward and can’t talk to girls). Where are the epic video game adventure books about women & queers?
paigehf commented on a post